Pro deal dilemma

skier_bum

skier_bum

Member
So the deal is i can get a pro deal on either rossi's or k2's for next season. Last season i was skiing 189 seth pistols, but sold them to my brother. I want something that will do it all, I skiid my pistols in the park and they weren't bad. I wanna know how the skinnier skis (scratch fs, pe) will handle in the backcountry. Or should i just go with either the scratch bc or the vicious.

any thoughts?
 
I would stick with The Seths...can't beat the all mtn performance, the pow skiing, and the full twin.
 
second rule of prodeals, dont talk about prodeals

i did like the seths but tey are noodles. I want something a bit stiffer, but that still will perform in the park. Im not really about butters or anything like that, just big slow spins.

how do they bcs perform out of pow? im gonna be skiing mostly at the coastal hills, whistler about 50% of the time so it will be as much pow as i can fin, but for the occaisional park run and groomer, how will the stand up?

 
umm it's not like some secret club, lots of people get them? im out with an acl/mcl replacement and haven't been to work to talk to any reps. give me a price.
 
I'm talking about the new Seths, what used to be called the Seth Viscious, but is now simply the Seth. They have a different flex and are supposed to be stiffer in the tail, plus get the 89s which have a thicker core profile = stiffer
 
haha wtf is the big deal? it's not a secret, if you work in the industry you get good deals...that how it works in almost every aspect of life? stop treating it like it's some holy fucking document fags.
 
but he did say he could only get a deal on rossi or k2 so that stopped suggestions of line and armada and others.

Id say the bc is a good ski for you. Rossignols bc and fs perform really well all mt as well as in the park. Plus keeping some width is good where your used to seths now.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top