Poles or no poles? which is better?

i like either i just think for me no poles makes thigns trickier. anyways personal preference but i like seeing jumps with poles. idk why
 
a pole by itself is pretty useless, a pole with a 19 year old busty female named cinnamon, or chartreuse... now were talkin!
 
then definitely poles. Fishing with nets has its advantages, but I prefer the one on one, man with fishing pole versus fish approach. Using nets seems like cheating.
 
no no the right way to do it is just stick your hand in the water with bait, that way the fish gets the bite you and it makes it harder for you to catch it, seems fair to me
 
Just dyno-mite that shit. Not really fair for the fish, but explosions are fun!

Don't try this at home kids.
 
why not ski with 2 sticks of dynamite as poles, i mean it'd be like a race, if you dont make it to the bottom before it blows you lose, which would probally be a good idea for those that find the need to constantly ask the question of POLES OR NO POLES
 
POLES! there is no way in hell I'm skatin around alta all day and tryin to push without them. not to mention BC skiing without them is just stupid, skinning with no poles sucks. no poles are only fun in the park.
 
no you have to get into the water with a harpoon and hunt the fish. poles or no poles are deffinetly a matter of opinion though, but when you see a gaper going down the hill with there poles above there heads you have to laugh.
 
pretty soon i bet almost everyone is gonna be skiing with no poles. they are just so useless in the park, plus when ypu pay attention to someones poles when they are doing a trick it looks goofy as fuck.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top