13076885:Nillion said:I remember seeing a pair on eBay the other day. They ran north of $100 though.
13076917:ctrace said:Yeah I saw those but the reason theyre so expensive is that they are an entire baseplate setup, I'm just looking for the brakes
13076917:ctrace said:Yeah I saw those but the reason theyre so expensive is that they are an entire baseplate setup, I'm just looking for the brakes
13076931:Pipe_Munky said:welcome to FKS bindings...
13077202:_J.T. said:well guess if you really think about it, fks are supposed to save your knees..... which costs more, a couple thousand dollars for an acl surgery, or 130 bucks for a new brake....
13077277:tomPietrowski said:They will in no way save your knees any more then any other alpine binding.
13077346:Strange.Journey. said:fairly certain that if you just send in the bindings to rossi they will send them back with the size brakes you want
13077319:Nillion said:I've always wondered if there is any data to support this assertion. Even if it's some informal poll at a forum comparing torn ACLs to binding type used when it occurred.
13077005:Huck_Norris said:Seriously, I have no idea why anyone who land switch with any regularity would want to deal with the FKS brakes.
I scored a pair of 155s a while back without brakes because someone broke them and simply sold them at massive discount rather than find brakes haha
13077504:KingTaco said:every bindings brakes will get fucked up if you land switch wrong. fks may be a touch more tempermental than others. But at the end of the day if you eject switch youre asking for your brakes to get destroyed.
13077545:Profahoben_212 said:He isn't saying they are more likely to break, he is saying that when they break they are like 3 to 4 times more expensive to replace than other bindings. So it is dumb to use them if you are landing switch a lot because you will eventually have to fork over $120 instead of $30.