Pic of my setup

[PESteele]

r these mouned back 2 far for rails

[BR]

 

[Snowcase]

are they small enough?

 

[PESteele]

there 159 but im ony 5'4"

 

[Snowcase]

o alright thats cool then

 

[PESteele]

but they r pretty small i shoud have gotton bigger but im coming of of 151

 

[Ryno]

i would have mounted in the same area if i had that

 

[dandoy]

Of course you can still use them on rails.

 

[1-pippin]

mabye a tiny bit more forward but it doesnt really matter. true center or something would seem wierd with shorter skis.

 

[spere]

nope, you will get used to the weight up front versus in the back in your first day up

 

[PESteele]

ok thanks

 

[Erie]

sick setup too

 

[Snowcase]

i love those skis and the boots nice matching job there

 

[617jibber]

you will be fine

 

[yellav]

yeah center mounted is nice but if your not center mounted its not like you cant hit rails

 

[ItsPhil]

they will work just dandily

 

[leone]

159 never looked so small before

 

[PESteele]

i kno they do look small but i think theyll do fine my friend saw a pic of them that was distorted and he thought they were snowblades

 

[Burrito]

You should have gotten red bindings. Then everything would have matched; it would have look nice.

 

[JazzyJ]

that setup is pretty sweet

 

[PirateManSkier]

shit bro... those are tiny...

 

[PirateManSkier]

but yah that is a pretty sick setup. those skis are gnar for sure...

Word/

 

[PESteele]

thanks i cant wait 2 ski em

 

[PirateManSkier]

where do you ski??

 

[PESteele]

mostly whitetail on the east then im going 2 park city for like a week

 

[PirateManSkier]

thats sick. so.. are you just getting into freestyle and what not?

 

[PESteele]

ive beendoing tricks in the park but not very advanced b/c i didnt have twin tips but now im gunna start ripping it up

 

[PirateManSkier]

for sure. go bust some rails and shit.

 

[Anathema]

why do people post this shit? i see no point. wow, you have skis..... like everybody else on this fuckin website.

 

[K2skipunk]

I came from a 160 to a 174

 

[AKFREERIDE]

i came from a 166 to a 185, whats your point.

 

[froom]

haha, that's what this site is for. If you don't like the topic of discussion, don't read the thread.

 

[=nick=]

PE's....nice.

 

[froom]

How 'bout these?

 

[froom]

fuck, take two.

 

[froom]

forget it. I swear I used the proper tags though.

https://www.newschoolers.com/ns3/web/content/pictures.php?img=60983&

 

[freeskibum82]

ski companies make skis to function properly at the mid sole mark. The sidecut is designed around that line. If you move the binding more than a cm or two infront of that line. the whole turning radius of the ski is thrown off and will not turn properly. As for sliding rails.. well the ski is balanced at that midsole mark and if you slide rails under foot you shouldnt have any problems.

 

[=nick=]

nice skis and matching boots, too bad there r scratch bindings. nut sick setup, because axiums arent as bad as ppl say.

 

[froom]

They're last years too...seem to be better than this years, DIN 11 instead of 10.

 

[Paul-o-Rama]

Thats a pretty sick setup. I think the skis just look small because the boots are so big

 

[PESteele]

there not scraches there s810 ti's which is even worst

 

[Lukey1080]

your fine dude, i had my 1080s at the regular mount, its pretty far back and I could slide rails pretty good, it doesnt even really matter that much

 

[Frostfired]

ya iv got my 1080s at reg and they seam too far back

by the way they are 161 heres a pic

 

[Luc.]

yeh man u is FINE

 

[Frostfired]

here

what size r those and where did u mount em?

 

[Public_Maverick]

that just means you'll have to buy another pair next season.

 

[PESteele]

dude i havnt grown in like 3

years

 

[cab_D]

i bet those skis are sick

 

[PESteele]

The 1080's or the PE's

 

[froom]

the 1080's with boots are 171's mounted at recommended.

 

[PirateManSkier]

those are pretty sick bro. how do they ride?

 

[froom]

Haven't riddent them yet...sooon though, soon.