PARK only twin ?

H

Hermenegilles_334

New member
Whic one should i buy ??

These were my choice.(the size are the one available):

-Head Mad Trix (163 cm)

-Nordica Beast 72 tt(166 cm)

-scratch fs (174 cm)

...and if i m only doing park ...what size should i get??

Thanks guys

 
well ethan, hes 178cm tall, and he wants to get a 163 mad trix? no no no. i would suggest the mad trix too (i have them and the kick ass)just in the 172. if not that, get the FS in 174

`=`=`=`=`=`=`=`=`

Sam

'i used to have a little but now i have a lot

im still im still wiener from the block' - wiener

VIVA LA RESISTANCE
 
(forgot to say that i m a beginner in skiing ...i was practicing snowblade for 4 years now... and I can get the MAD_TRIX with a Tyrolia binding for 629$can(around 400 us i ll say and it s not used)... just a little update hehe.

**sorry for my sucky english :-/

 
Im 178 cm too and I have scratch fs 174 and I wouldn't get shorter ski. I don't go big adn I'm light.

 
I would get FS, thats because im a really big fan of Rossi. But, if not those then get the mad trix

--------------------------------

Proud Owner of Rossignol BC's
 
if your a beginner, you might like a softer flex, so probably go for the scratch... for a park only ski, its one of the best... if you want all mountain performance too, i'd get the mad trix though.

------

i didn't come here with pants, and i'm not leaving with pants
 
id say scratch for legnth but the mad trix hold up and are a better all around ski

'Ski Patrol has no problem with us being here, as long as they dont know about it!'- Chris Colins
 
madtrix is way to short for you. scratch all the way.

googoo271 - 'Oh of course we get a post from our good ignorant assfuck, phrosty'

Oh, shit I spelt something wrong? Fuck you cocksucker!

Jesusjr.com

Wasted State Represent!!

I like my boots like my women, rear entry.
 
..damn , Mad and FS look pretty close too each other :-/.

But i ve heard on this board that some ppl have durability problem with the Scratch (stress crack , top sheetcracking and peeling at the edges , etc...)

Is it true or what :-/ ?? ...that s why i aws considering MAD_TRIX ...event if it s 163 ....so what should i do (damn newbie ....hehe)

ThX again guys for your help

 
mad trix is way more durable, but dude, 163 is just too short. i'm 5'11' (only one inch taller than you) and i'm on madtrix 181's. I guess if its for park only, it wouldn't be as bad, and shorter probably will feel better to you, as you are a beginner, but consider this... you're gonna outgrow it. your skills are gonna outgrow a 163 real quick.

------

i didn't come here with pants, and i'm not leaving with pants
 
...and considering i m a beginner (and ex-skiboarder) ...do you guys think i ll see a big difference between those 2 ski (M-Trix and FS)??

PS: i weight around 165 lbs...so around 72

 
You are 5'10'. You don't want to ride a 163 it's too short. Get something bigger. The scratch FS is a super nice pipe/park ski. Don't know much about the Nordica, but the mad trix is too short.

 
skies aren't based off your height anymore its more your waight and height comblined i am 5'9' 155 and ride 169 and they are perfect go talk to a shop that know about twins and size ratio

.:[Tyler]:.
 
All park ski? Well the new K2 Public Enemy is 70% park and 30% all mountain. Plus, they have the tightest graphics on any ski out there! k2factoryteam.com

REMEMBER: It's 10% equipment, and 90% rider.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top