Parents tripp'n out

if you insist.

the first dumb thing you said was that, by 16, this kid should be mature enough not to mess with people. you then said that, in retaliation, op should steal the kids homework and throw it away. you seemed not to recognize that that response is at least, if not more, immature than what the kid did.

second dumb thing you said was that if op doesn't retaliate he's a bitch. that logic stops being valid after middle school. in the real world no one believes that not retaliating makes you a bitch. in the real world people normally think people who retaliate to things they shouldn't retaliate to are idiots.

third dumb thing you said was that the brother is lucky not to have charges pressed on him because stealing is illegal. he took op's weed, which is an illegal substance, and didn't even keep it for himself. he gave it to his parents. so, first, thats confiscating something, not stealing. second, you can't press charges on someone for stealing an illegal substance without you yourself getting in trouble for having said illegal substance. similarly, you can, on the other hand, get in trouble for bringing an illegal substance into someone's house.

fourth dumb thing you said was that my questions were arguments. and that my explanation as to why i wasn't arguing was an argument.

fifth dumb thing you said was that i claimed my questions were insults that i claimed were my argument. really, they were just questions, not insults, and i certainly never claimed they were arguments.

sixth dumb thing you said was that the brother is lucky weed is illegal or he would be in trouble for stealing. this is dumb because weed IS illegal and obviously the brother knew that so it isn't at all lucky.

seventh dumb thing you said was that it is absurd to think it is okay to take illegal substances from people when they bring them into your home. this is so stupid i'm not sure what to say. i guess i'll emphasize that is an illegal substance. as in you cannot, by law, carry it around. knowingly letting it exist in your home is also illegal. NOT telling his parents could have potentially gotten the brother in trouble. if someone came into your house with a bunch of cocaine and started railing lines with his friends, you don't think you should be allowed to take it, call the cops, and stop them?
 
Hahaha just got around to reading the last page. This HashBlazer420 kid is fucking hilarious in the worst kind of way. What a dumbass.
 
> Can't quote exactly because you never said that.

I made your post a little more honest.

Oh yes, I remember now. Binghamton. That's even worse. You probably got into Princeton but couldn't afford it, right?

 
way to completely skirt the issue at hand. You tried calling someone else out for being terrible at arguing, then go and make personal attacks.
 
hahaha I just realized you even wrote in my feedback. Props for that, until Ashley wrote in it last year I didn't even know it existed.
 
1. Fine, "mature" was a poor word choice. The kid should still be better than to hurt people unprovoked.

2. So you were that one guy who was shouting for peace after Pearl Harbor? No, virtually everybody wanted to go to war because everybody knows that if you let somebody walk on you without consequence, they're going to keep walking on you. It's the same idea as punishing people for committing crimes. In your fictional world where nobody believes in retaliating against injustices, there would be no such thing as a courts or prisons. Like, how stupid must society be to think that people should be punished for stealing? That's so middle school.

3. Confiscating and stealing are the same thing. The brother took his property without permission. That's the definition of stealing. I never said he should press charges against the brother for stealing from him. I simply stated that the brother ought to be held liable for his crimes, and he is lucky that he won't be.

4. Your supposed question was "are you 12?" Don't pretend like that was a legitimate query. It's common in internet arguments to say "I don't like your argument, so I think you're a little kid." Simply asking if I'm 12 is just a way of rephrasing that sentiment.

5. You called me stupid multiple times. If that isn't an insult in your book, I don't know what is.

6. You're using the word "lucky" in an overly literal sense. He most likely would have taken any substance away from them that he thought the parents wouldn't let them use. If they had been smoking cigarettes or salvia instead, the kid probably still would have stolen them.

7. If he wanted to eject OP from his property, it's more than within his rights to do so. He, however, has no right to steal from him just because OP is on his property. He could have easily told his parents or kicked him out of the house himself without stealing the weed, but he didn't. If my sister brought her friends into my house, and they started doing cocaine together because I'd rather have them do drugs in the safety of our house than out on the streets. But even if I did want to kick them out, I wouldn't steal their drugs. If she brought her friends into my house and they started playing loud music when I didn't want them to, that wouldn't give me the right to steal their stereo.

Seriously, for everybody else, hitting the shift key is second nature. I do it with no extra effort. The fact that it's too much of a bother for you to do it at all shows that you're not only really lazy, but really stupid as well. You're too stupid to do it naturally, and you're too lazy to force yourself to do it. Pretty shitty combination of traits I must say.
 
Honestly, I'm a little worried that you spend so much time on a computer that, 1.) the fact that people don't use capital letters gets you butthurt, and 2.) it has become "second nature" to you to press the shift key. Eating, drinking, sleeping, pissing, shitting are things I do naturally. Hitting the shift key, not so much.

You're 11 years old, man. Go outside, have fun, enjoy your youth.

I was going to respond to the whole post, but then I read this and decided not to. I used the shift key, though, so hopefully that will appease you.
 
So, you're saying your "argument" for the use of the shift key was relevant to the discussion in any way? Don't be a fucking hypocrite.
 
I couldn't give less of shit whether or not you capitalize your letters. I'm just using the fact that you don't to prove your stupidity.
 
so, you're saying, that because i don't press a button while i type, i must be stupid?

i don't know, man. i'd say the fact that you think that my not using the shift key is proof that i am stupid is pretty good evidence of YOUR stupidity.
 
Yes. Almost every intelligent person in the developed world has used a computer often enough to be comfortable with hitting the shift key.

What does it say about you that you aren't comfortable with it? Either a) you're an anomaly or b) you're stupid. I'm placing my bets on stupid.
 
you're i am uncomfortable/incapable of doing so as opposed to just not doing so by choice. let me clear it up. i am perfectly capable and perfectly comfortable, i just choose not to do so.

and, again, where is the correlation between intelligence and pressing a button? i would say any stupid person who has used a computer often enough is also perfectly comfortable using the shift key. unless you honestly believe that stupid people have a more difficult time using the shift key than intelligent people, your argument doesn't hold much water.
 
no, you know you've lost an argument when one of your main points is that the other people don't use the shift key.
 
"You know you've lost an argument when your rebuttal completely ignores your opponent's main points."

Ah, my mistake. I suppose your personal attack regarding his use of the shift key was directly related to the main point of his argument. Don't worry, it's probably just my poor reading skills.
 
Well I'm barely literate, so it must have been my fault.

which is funny, because between Ar6 and myself, we probably have at least double the number of years of education that this kid has years of being alive.
 
Well, AR6 is going to disagree with me no matter what he actually thinks because that's his shtick. His opinion isn't really relevant.

You were probably educated at community college because all of your arguments consist of ignoring my arguments and just calling me a little kid.

What's funny is that there are like five of you guys all teaming up on me and not one of you can manage to post a well-reasoned response as to why I'm wrong. Like, how many NSers does it take to screw in a light bulb? Quite a few evidently.
 
Of course stupid people can capitalize words too. That doesn't contradict my logic. My claim is that almost all intelligent people regularly capitalize words. Either you're an anomaly or you're stupid. Because I have previously concluded on multiple occasions that you are stupid, my guess is that it's a result of you being a moron.
 
Oh, look. More hypocrisy. All of your "arguments" consist solely of trying to belittle him based on his punctuation and method of insulting you. You keep saying things like "you were probably educated at community college" and "you probably lack intelligence, because most people with intelligence use the shift key." How is that any different than him calling you a kid (which is actually kind of warranted, given the way you present yourself). Stop trying to make yourself sound smart. It's not fooling anyone.
 
There's a big difference between making an occasional mistake and fucking up every single time because you don't know any better.
 
this hashblazer character is quickly becoming one of my favourite contributors, quite enlightened.

all i get out of this is the slight enjoyment over how seriously marijuana is taken by both sides.
 
Why don't you know any better? Just about every post you make on this site is a fuck up. Are you suggesting that, you, the stupendously intelligent HashBlazer420, are actually a fucking idiot?
 
Why don't you know any better? My post quality far exceeds yours. If I'm a "fucking idiot," what does that make you?
 
Me.

Not that who said it is relevant. Whether or not it's true is what's relevant, and right now I have exactly as much evidence supporting my claim as you do supporting yours.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top