Pant Sizing

soup

soup

Active member
i was looking for some long pants for the winter at some of the local Canada Sales and realized something: the longest pants are only in like 40 inch wastes. now i dont know about any of you but i have never seen a tall fat guy. this pisses me off because im skinny and 6'2' and its really hard to find ski pants that are long and have a small waste. the ski industry is fucking stupid

___________________

ARMADAS ARE THE BEST SKI!!!BUY THEM

 
You must not be looking that hard. My pants drag they're so long, I'm 6'3' and have like a 34-36 waist. Buy Obermeryer, its not that hard.

VIVA LA FRONTFLIP!
 
ever heard of a belt

dont go to new york. all it has to offer is i love ny stickers

member 9020

newbies are our future unless if we stop them now!
 
6'2, XXL Rip Curl Lo Rider pants, and yes, i use a belt.

(although my waist is more in proportion so yeh, but i still reckon the best is just get a belt)

 
me too, i am 6'2' and i have ripcurl ones, my oakleys are XL and too short i hate them, maybe i can alter them with my sewing skills

PP6 JULY 11

PUT A CORK IN IT:

I HATE NY PRODUCTIONS

 
belts suck. they help a little to keep the pants up but not that much when the pants are like 6 inches too big

___________________

ARMADAS ARE THE BEST SKI!!!BUY THEM

 
get a belt and it dont matter how big your pants are

'Really, I gotta say that I'm glad you exist, 'cause if there wasn't there'd be noone to make fun of and diss.'
 
yes there are tall fat guys out there, a lot of em actually, and I agree, the belt is your best bet, and be thankful you aren't short and fat, finding pants that fit right is even more problematic.

life is too short to have any regrets
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top