14472793:eheath said:You'd be better of with a gh3 IMO the af100 was sort of a half assed version of the sony fs100.
14472848:WoFlowz said:alr. i was looking at it cause it was relatively cheap compared to another hmc or hpx and i could get the scene files to match up with my hmc. plus i figured there might be some nice fish eyes out there for it
14472861:eheath said:The thing is, the af100 only does 720p60 and 1080p30, which is similar to the hmc/hpx but I think you could match a gh3 for much less, same lenses. Only thing the af100 has over the gh3 is built in NDs, unless you're getting an af100 for less than $500 id look into the gh3.
14472948:isaacwrong said:Second what eheath said..it's a cool lil setup but a gh3, cage and fish is practically the same price, and going to give you better quality vid. Chris from [tag=121345]@860media*[/tag] used the af100 in a bunch of vids prior to gh5
14472861:eheath said:The thing is, the af100 only does 720p60 and 1080p30, which is similar to the hmc/hpx but I think you could match a gh3 for much less, same lenses. Only thing the af100 has over the gh3 is built in NDs, unless you're getting an af100 for less than $500 id look into the gh3.
14474222:860media* said:Also..... the AF100 can record in 1080 60p just doesn't record sound.
14474268:eheath said:That's right, over cranked only maybe? Either way, it was never that good, I remember when it first came out and I almost bought it, but then the fs100 came out