One's Outlook on the Middle East Crisis

MitchPee

Active member
Well, I read some interesting stuff today, and there was a thread in which I stated I would post my opinions and possible solutions to the current situation. Please don't nit pick this, I made a lot of points that I may have disproved myself or proved, so put a little effort into it.

Recently President Bush has requested that more troops be sent to Iraq. A lot of people have seen this as stupid and overbearing. Perhaps more troops IS what Iraq needs, but just not in the use that Bush would like to use them. It has already been shown that fighting only provokes more fighting.

Take a look at a relatively unknown, yet highly effective general in Mosul, Iraq named David Petraeus. He brought the city of Mosul, a city mixed with Sunni and Shia Muslims, to complete peace. His success went unknown. You may be asking how did he do this? He did this the only way it is possible to "win" the War in Iraq. He treated the people of Iraq like humans. He made sure his soldiers treated the population with respect and kindness. He didn't allow his soldiers to dangle a water bottle from a hummer while children chased it through the streets. He didn't allow his troops to knock down doors and ravage any house that may have contained an "enemy". He didn't allow his troops to beat and torture random Iraqis. He rebuilt roads and buildings. His soldiers dug roads, built schools, and repaired other municipal facilities/targets instead of setting up road blocks and looking for the "enemy". Yet, Bush and Rumsfeld had him replaced with another general who was much more fond of the "kill em all" policy. Well, a week after Petraeus was sent on other missions, the city of Mosul turned into complete chaos. This, to me, says the way we have been acting in Iraq for the past 3 years has been totally unjustified and incorrect.

This leads us back to the operation in Iraq not "working". A huge reason is because of Iraq's youth. In a country where almost half of the population is under 18, it is easy to see that many people have been heavily affected by this war. It is not uncommon to see kids as little as 6 years walking around guarding make-shift roadblocks with Kalishnakov's (AK-47's). The few children that haven't yet dropped out of school are not allowed to sit next to the windows because many schools in Baghdad have been struck by mortar shells and stray bullets. 70% of Iraqi children no longer attend school as regulary or if at all as they used to. This and the destruction of the Iraqi economy is causing a major poverty problem in Iraq. As we have learned in the past, the youth can be the deadliest weapon that a country can face. Secretarian warfare has caused children to witness murder, rape, torture, and corruption in mass amounts. According to the state department, 9 out of 10 Iraqis view the US as an invading force. Many of the youth were born in the impoverished aftermath of the war with Iran. This is causing an unemployed and uneducated youth where revenge controls their every goal in life. They are very impressionable and rash to do things for the good of the only family some people have...the "insurgents". These children whose fathers have been murdered in front of their very eyes, whose houses have been blown apart by a misguided mortar, and whose families have been torn apart by this war to give the Iraqi people "freedom" has caused a new generation of hate and vengence. The youth, is in a lot of trouble if we continue to use violent force in Iraq.

While there is no solution right now as to clear the mistakes we have made, the best thing we can do is give it time. It is far too late to try and coerce Iraq into a "fair" government. It won't happen anymore. There is far too much hate provoked between the Shiite, Sunni, and other groups that Iraq has. The only way to guarentee democracy is to eliminate all parties except for one. Is this what Bush eventually plans to do?

During WW2, the US dropped two atomic bombs onto the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki which killed hundreds of thousands of people. This was the most deadly bombing the world has ever seen. The Japanese hated Americans for years to come after for the mass amounts of people that had been killed. Yet, we rebuilt the country and spent billions of dollars to rebuild what we had destroyed and whom we had killed.

It's fairly obvious that the current administration has made some major mistakes and caused what looks to be a very major long term problem. Unfortunately, 99% of politicians (made up statistic) look for results in short term prospect. Even Bush's own political party is starting to disagree with most of what he says. What we have done in Iraq, has stired up a bees nest that will take generations to settle.

As Americans, we live our lives to whatever extent we wish. We rarely think about the problem that is halfway across the world. We turn on the TV and get the same old story in Iraq. Please do yourselves a favor, read magazines and independant research articles on Iraq. US TV media is censored and controlled by all of four people. Magazines and independant research are far more "balanced" than any TV program. As Rice said "We love our guys at fox". Interesting...

Back to the point, Iraq is only one country in the Middle East, yet its influence on the region is far more than unsurpassable. Iranian and Syrian influence have caused a trail of fire to spread from Baghdad to Tehran and into Damascus...that fire is anti-Americanism, and it can't be put out with water.

So how do we stop these countries from forming "Al Qaedas" and blowing up our skyscrapers? We must first look at the roots of Bin Laden's prominent orginization that is now a household name in North America and most of Europe. We must look at WHY people would take their own lives just to kill the lives of those that have caused them harm. Your average American might say something similar to "they are jealous of our freedom". Get the fuck over yourselves and open your eyes. The roots go as far back as the creation of the Qu'ran which says that revenge can "clense the soul of sin". Thus giving many Muslims the philosophy that an "eye for an eye" is justified by one's own benefits. This one little saying could be the most harmful thing the US will ever see. Al Qaeda has been ultimately blown out of proportion by the media and ignorant people in our political and national system. Unfortunately, we are indeed ignorant to the way of life to these people and their beliefs. Our government often labels "terrorists" as Al Qaeda because the American public can't comprehend the fact that there isn't a terrorist organization with cells in many different countries all over the world.

Our country is on the verge of a social and political revolution. Much like that of the Post-Vietnam War. Democrats will be indeed favored in the next election simply because of the tarnished reputation the Republicans have received as a result of our current president. Hopefully, they will understand this fight is not one where you can fight fire with fire, you must sit and watch it burn down until it has been burnt out, then you rebuild what used to be standing on the plot.

 
well done, i completely concur. The justification of violence as a prevention method absolutely blows my mind. You look at ghandi and what he accomplished, and then know that in iraq there are soldiers who enjoy killing, and who kill random iraqis and place confiscated weapons in their hands, then label them as an enemy soldier. There are videos of this. Ive seen one, as a friend of mine just returned from iraq, trying to get out of the military asap. WE should be able to treat the civilians of an occupied country civilly. That a few of their members attacked us, does not justify the random terrorization, and violence against the rest. Iraq needs to make a 180 degree shift.
 
Whatever, I feel like there's some really enhancing stuff in there, but I'm not one to claim so find out for yourself.
 
i read and my take is that the media has is giving a distorted view of Iraq, b/c if you talk to someone who has actual been there they say that it is nothing like what the media portrays. Also I think allot more troops should be sent over to Iraq and just finish it. Lastly, with the rest of the middle east we need to learn from the past b/c when Neville Chamberland appeased Hitller and Nazi Germany and tried negoitating with evil it got the entire world into deepshit, so dont think that we can talk with Iran, Syria, Lebanon, etc (even North Korea) and they will listen.
 
Please explain how we just "finish it". Do you mean eliminating all members of a party until only one remains, because that's the only way violence will solve this, and that would be killing a lot of people...

We can talk with Lebanon and Syria. Rice has made a lot of progress with Palestine, Israel, and Lebanon, but she isn't quite there and probably won't ever be because of her beliefs. This is NOTHING like Nazi Germany. This is many enemies with completely different reasons for war.
 
It is allot like the Nazi b/c they believe that their way of life is the only way and you either switch or die
 
hold up. who are you to be speaking for an entire culture? do you know thats what iraqis feel because youve been there? NO. You know that because youre a product of fox news and blind repulican dedication. Just stop talking if youre gonna say things that you blatantly dont support with any type of factual evidence. prove this shit, dont just talk it.
 
Our close family friend is a two star general who has been to Afgahnistan and Iraq and we have talked allot. Also i am not a republican (nor a democrat) and i dont watch fox news. Want proof, many factions of islam hate the freedoms our country has especially the freedom that our women have, they hate that we are not muslim and believe something different seriously they hate the fact that other muslims dont believe in the exact same thing they might believe. The islamic fascists dont like us b/c the west's lifestyle is not the same as theirs.
 
Oh my god dude...NO, just no. I explained this in my post.

Look, Iraq had no intentions of attacking us or interfering with our way of life. They don't give two shits about our freedoms. The only reason we have soldiers dying is because we are in THEIR territory. We wouldn't have had any attacks on us if we hadn't invaded Iraq. There would be no dead soldiers. My neighbor wouldn't be firing an artillery cannon at "insurgent" positions.

Generals are some of the most biased people on earth (given a select few that aren't). They're appointed by some of the most opinionated and politically extreme people in this country. Their behind the desk position is no more credible than the journalist who works for a slanted media corporation.

Please, stop being like the average American.
 
again dude, listening to a general in the army is not proof that a culture feels that way. When i see proof, a statement made by all of iraq that they feel taht way, then a generalization can be made. before that, its just an excuse for violence, and should eb treated as nothing more than a judgement on the part of americans. That STILL is not conclusive evidence. Has this general done anything more than tell you that? Did he offer documents, or videos, in which there was overwhelming support that "theyre jealous of our freedoms?" Thats rediculous. Thats like saying we invaded iraq to teach the women to become equal citizens. nothing could be farther from the truth. an excuse is an excuse.

You should also look at the lyrics, or listen to "dance with the devil" by immortal technique.
 
From that statement, its pretty much clear you have no idea about the Nazi party or Islam.

And as for the article - *Applause* Spot on. People have to realize that there is no short term solution for Iraq, and that we wont get a 'victory' like we do in most wars. Wars against nouns are rarely won (eg, the war on drugs, the war on poverty...), so I dont expect our war on terror to go very far anyways. We need to be addressing the real problem, as you stated - all we are doing is furthering the hatred towards the US.
 
Exactly, we are fueling the fire of a youth, and that is going to cause far more problems than any terrorist attack ever will.
 
Also, its scary the amount of people that will agree with you when you say "We're in Iraq because Saddam's part in 9/11". The misinformation thats sweeping across this country is astounding, even shocking.
 
You are correct sir. Iraq had zero to do with 911. A point is made in that song, talking about how if the us wouldnt blink an eye about destroying two buildings in a country that sponsored bombings of us, which i think we need to consider. We funded Al quida, we created this, and now we're using republican controlled media to spread dis-information (think nazi party, 1938), to jsutify our cause.

 
Definitely is,

read the recent article..."The Next Jihadists"

Could be one of the best articles I've ever read.
 
Also, take into note about the invasion of Somalia by US backed Ethiopian troops that almost nobody even knew about that happened recently.
 
Good stuff. I don't really have allot to add but just one question.

When you're making the point about how the American troops currently in Iraq are mistreating the civilians there, raiding houses, etc. Do you have proof of these acts? If so is there some place I can read about it?

Also... What are your thoughts on the Canadians in Afghanistan? I don't think they are doing the same things as the Americans at all.

 
Well here's the thing. Canadian troops in Afghanistan aren't having to face the urban warfare and resistance US troops are in Iraq. Canadian troops aren't being mentally diminshed by constant suicide bombings and the like. The Canadian presence in Afghanistan is really uncomparable to the actions of US troops in Iraq.

Yes, I have heard many stories, read articles, and seen videos of troops in Iraq acting completely out of line in regards to human rights. It's true.
 
Yeah they also lived to about 30 and didn't have any skiing. You can't possibly say yo uwould rather live back in that time period. That defines struggle to survive.
 
Dude, I hope you're being sacrastic. the people 2000 years ago didn't have shit, the quality of their lives wasn't shit compared to what we have now.

Anyway good thread, if only more people realized there is a lot of truth in what you say.....
 
that is the first worthy piece of writing I have seen from Newsweek.

the middle east is fucked. Every group hates every other group and not too many of them want to resolve the situation peacefully.
 
No dude. He totally does. Remember how Hitler told the Jews that they could just stop being Jews and live? Oh wait, he didn't. He just fucking annihilated them.
 
If you want to compare the 'War on Terror 'to Nazi Germany and the Holocaust, be my guest. Go ahead and compare egg salad to ink jet cartridges while you're at it.
 
i retrack my statements i am just saying shit about something i dont even care about. I was just saying shit to piss people off
 
All I have to say is, that's war for ya. Talking about how children seeing their fathers being killed, or their homes blown up, but whats the more diplomatic solution? there isn't one. We can't just sit them down and say 'stop fighting' because it doesnt work. You think we WANT to kill these people? No, we are trying to rid the Iraqi people of these terrorists, or "freedom fighters". Freedom from what? to be free from other people with different religions? yeah, theres another word for that, GENOCIDE. My teacher put it best, short term pain for long term gain, is what he said to me.
 
Yes I did. I even re-read it just to make sure I hadn't missed anything. Nope. Its still a bullshit comparison. The only similarity I can draw is that they both are called (somewhat disputably so with the most recent one) "Wars" and in both conflicts, people were killed. As far as Osama being the next Hitler... *ahem*

(In the voice of Darth Vader): "I find your lack of knowledge disturbing..."
 
although i didnt read any of the intial post or anyones above....

MY THOUGHts:

BLOW UP THE MOTHER FUKCERS

They kill them selves anyone why dont we do them selves a favor...
 
I think you're all worked up and not catching the real underlying important parts.

I'm on your side buddy.

"Hitler told the jews they could stop being jews and then they could live."

We both know that didn't happen. I was backing you up. Dense. hmm.
 
Haha, sorry, sarcasm rarely catches over the internet. And yes, a few people have me worked up right now, I should go back to Biochem.
 
Well, on one side, the Republican party has lost the confidence of the country and probably the next presidential election.
 
You gotta love the political backfire. I just hope the Dem's can get it together and actually rally behind a strong figure.
 
Thats also something that was pissing me off last night while I was watching TV. I'm a democrat, yes, but I hate it when people talk about the war like it's a Republican problem. While a Republican led senate and house may have approved the war Bush began, whats going on right now in Iraq isnt just their problem. Iraq is now America's problem, regardless of which political party began it. Democrats have as much responsability now to solve the problem as Republicans do. We cant just let one party deal with it.

Polarization of politics in this country is insane. We need to come together on things and stop putting blame or responsibility on the other side. Its really killing our country, and needs to stop. How can we expect to get anything done if we sit amongst ourselves arguing over who's fault it was?
 
my dads cousin worked for the un and he was real high up in the world food program, he retired a few years ago so he could move to the states and get his dyslexic son in a better school. but hes been called back to the middle east a few times since his retirement, because i guess he was really good at his job. anyways hes seen everything over there, worked directly with tommy franks and bush and anyone else important in the issue.

so anyways had a talk with him the other night, and note that i dont spend a lot of my time thinking about politics so some of what he said went completely over my head, and i cant account for how credible it is, but his ideas seemed very interesting. by the way his name is russ.

so russ mentioned something about how bad bush was fucking up , and my dad whos a republican, but doesnt really know his shit was like "well what do you want us to do? just up and leave?" like hes heard said at least a million times on radio and tv. so russ is just like no, if we leeave no then iraq is gonna be like they obviously dont give a shit, and look for offers from other countrys in the region such as iran who will be happy to take care of them.

so then he went on a tangent about iran and explained a little of their history. i never really had any idea what the deal wasand why they "hate us" so much. so anyways i guess the us supported the terribly oppressive ruling iranian government during the cold war because they were pro west. so then the government was overthrown and they received help from the russians in rebuilding the government, then when they were fighting with iraq, the us backed saddam up and sold him tons and tons of arms. so now i understand why iran hates us so much, wouldnt you?

so anyways, now iran wants a bomb, because as they see it theres no better way to get people to listen to you. so do you think the best way for us to stop them from getting the bomb is to yell at them and say "you cant have a bomb cause your bad people, and you cant do that". what russ says we need to do is establish more contact, and less isolation.

so now russ suggests, the best waay to deal with iraq is to let countries from the area be involved on a higher level than just doing gruntwork to support our plans. so , russ says, if we go to iran, and tell listen, were really against you having a bomb, and we always will be, if you want nuclear energy, ok, we can help you with that, but in the meantime, how would you like to help us sort out this iraq mess. give them limited control of the situation with certain stipulations. such as, keep it democratic, and of course we would mantain some supervision.

anyways, this seems like agood solution to me, iran would leap on any opportunity to have an influence in iraq. we would need to mantain the current troop levels at first, until more and more of the burden was transfered over to other countries in the region.

again, i cant say i know exactly what im saying when it comes to politics, and i may have missed some of what he said, but what ive said here makes pretty good sense to me
 
You hit the nail on the head pretty much for Iranian history. We supported the Shah whom was very oppressive and eventually was revolted against and created the anti-American atmosphere of Iraq today.

Unfortunately, Iran's government doesn't just have a problem with our government, it's the whole style of our global economy. Corporations are oppressive on people and resources and this is what they set out to change by building nuclear arms. I don't think Americans are ready to give up their Hummers and amazingly cheap technologies just so Iran won't have a bomb...do you?
 
Back
Top