That's being presented out of context:
Just like Mike says, they originally launched the FIS sucks campaign because, in the early stages of the sport they did not want to lose control of what they created. At that time, the sport was in its infancy and did not have the type of self-sustaining life and industry that it does now. It is a COMPLETELY DIFFERENT situation now. The sport is now thriving on it's own, and allowing FIS to hold some events will not mean that they "control" the sport any more than they "control" snowboarding.
Is Travis Rice controlled by FIS in any way? Is Danny Kass? Not at all, but FIS does provide an opportunity for those guys to go to the Olympics (BTW Travis was trying out for the Torino Games but didn't qualify). If you were to ask Travis how much FIS has "ruined snowboarding" he would laugh all the way to his helicopter, after all, snowboarding is exactly how he decides to make it, and that also goes for Shaun, Louie, etc. They get to do what they want, if that happens to be going to the Olympics, then they have the chance to do it.
Is Lucas Magoon controlled by FIS just because FIS got snowboarding an Olympic berth? Of course not, he chooses to follow his own vision of snowboarding, just as everyone will still be free to follow your own vision of skiing even when skiing HP gets in the Olympics. If your vision is to stay away from FIS and the Olympics, you will certainly be free to do that, and if someone like Justin Dorey's vision is to go to the Olympics, then hopefully that choice will finally be there for him.
BTW the entire purpose of the ski pipe event referenced in that interview, that Mike was pitching along with Whistler Blackcomb during 2010, was to highlight the sport to both the Vancouver Olympic crowds as well as the IOC, specifically to support getting ski pipe into the Olympics.
The only people who will actually be affected by the Olympics, are the competition halfpipe skiers. And since they ALL want it, then why would anyone who isn't a halfpipe competitor be opposed to it? Why would you not support fellow skiers getting to do what they want?
Anyone bitching about "how our sport is being represented" obviously cares more about the image than the experience. If someone wants the experience of Olympic competition, then who are we to say they shouldn't be allowed to do that?
It's only people who don't do pipe who oppose it, and if you think about that, it's actually pretty hilarious.
Honestly, imagine a halfpipe skier saying that skiers shouldn't be allowed to hit urban rails because "that's not where I want to see the sport going, I don't want our sport to be represented like that."