who cares how many big mountain skiers can 270 onto a rail? The point some people have been making is they are completely different things. People spend their time on different pursuits.
If you want to 270 onto a rail, you'll spend time in the park trying it til you get it, (assuming you're close to that level of park riding). But I'm sure there's plenty of big mountain riders that don't care. I mean, if you're getting helipcoptered into mountains in alaska, would you really care that you can't 270 onto a rail?
Similarly, if you're a ridiculous park skier, and can kill 4+ kink urban rails, should it bother you that you can't take down a steep face in the alps? Everyone has access to different terrain, and everyone enjoys different things.
Lastly, judging people based on a video segment is pretty stupid in my mind. If someone is real good, it can be pretty obvious from a move seg. But some guys just don't have as much time to film, don't spend the time to film, etc. Guys that have all park segments in a movie may spend their other time hitting powder lines, off camera.
Watching a ski movie is frequently like watching a video game. It's way different when you see the shit in real life. I've heard people talk shit on candide's cork to rail gap because he barely touched much of the rail. But put yourself on the top of that inrun, planning on doing an off axis spin over 50 feet, and landing on metal. Different story.
Bottom line, don't be so judgemental, park and pow/bc are 2 different things, comparison is pretty pointless. This post wasn't about the offtrail movie, I haven't seen it. But some of the shit talking is just plain wrong and uninformed.