jimbobs
Member
14619048:muffMan. said:Clash is about the same price, would most likely do better downhill too. Definitely want to try them both. Pretty sure commencal lets you put the cost of a demo towards a bike if you purchase
Seems like SX if you plan on riding a good mix of trails and lift service stuff vs Clash if you mainly will do lift service with some trail riding.
I rode park on a Clash (both versions) for 3 years, and still have my Clash V2 as a backup rig. The Clash is more playful (mainly from the steep headtube and short chainstays), but suffers in technical and fast terrain from that jibby geometry and 27.5 front wheel.
You can mullet it, (I did), but it really messes with the geometry unless you underfork it to 160mm and/or use an offset bushing. The 29" front wheel up front feels like a cheat code in comparison to the stock 27.5". The SX does this out of the box.
The Meta SX is way more capable, balanced, and confident, especially when trails get spicy. The Clash is a little more beginner friendly (easier to hop around at lower speeds) but really hits a speed limit in anything rough.
If your bike park trips are 100% jumps and flow, the Clash will work. But the Meta is way more well-rounded, balanced, modern, and capable. If I had to buy my Commencal again, I'd pick the Meta SX instead. Especially in bigger sizes, when that reach is 500+mm, but the chainstays are still 435mm. It's extremely unbalanced. In a small or medium, it's less of an issue.



