Oakley Evo Jkt + Pieced Togheter Pant

H

hardey

Member
I think I am going for the Evo Jkt(ozone) and the Pieced Together Pant (ozone) but i dunno which size ... I am 6'0", would xxl be too baggy....how long will fit the JKT then and what other oakley pants are there in the same colour????
 
XL or XXL would be fine depending on how baggy you want it to be.

There's already a thread on all the jackets and pants that come in ozone.
 
thx for answers yeah i found the thread but one question... how long will the evo lite jacket fit in xxl???...to the knees???
 
ohh no, its fuckin huge. It will make you look like a child. Don't get me wrong. Like the sleeves hang over my hands. I would say get the XL. It will be big, but not to the point where you drown in your jacket.
 
okey i think i go for the pants 100% in xxl and order a oakley jacket in xl and decide then if i want it bigger or not...the problem is when i want the pant and jacket in xxl the shop has to make a special order for me and i have to take the stuff because they normaly has sizes not bigger than xl...and does anyone know what the difference between the evo and the evo lite is???? thx
 
Get the pants in 2XL and the jacket in xl. Oakley's 2XL pants are rediculously small compared to other brands' 2XL.
 
wrong......i just have an xl in Baggy, im 6'1....the the crotch is to my KNEES. I have a xxl in loose fit, and that is to my knees too. It depends on what fit you get. Oakley is massive stuff, like MASSIVE.
 
some of this info is so false. from my experience (i'm 6'1) L always ends up being way too short, xl can do the trick, and xxl is really the only way to go. if there was a xxxl I'd buy it. Honestly, xxl for pants, xl or xxl for jacket depending on if you want baggy or kinda baggy, I just got a xxl oakley mast suit in the mail today and it isn't even THAT big. I mean it's ballin, but i'm not swimming in it.
 
...then does anyone know what fit the "pieced together pant" and the "evo" have, because i can't find any info on oakley.com...???
 
I will find out if it's neccessary, but can you not get the flow of this thread?

It's saying get XL, if you get 2XL you'll look like a bit of a dick
 
I can follow the thread, but everyone is saying other shit =)... it would be cool when you can find it out, thx...
 
dude you are soo wrong. honestly dont act like people are stupid just because you have some weird porportioned body with short legs. Oakley pants are TINY. you are wrong, their pants are TINY. Im an average sized 6'2, and I had a pair of XL oakleys. they were the smallest pants ive owned in 2 years, and the first XL i had ever bought. I ended up selling them because unless I sagged to my lower thighs they were redicolously short.

To the creator, you should definitely go with XXL pants. An XL jacket would be fine, as would a XXL. But the jackets actually run decently large, so an XL would give you a nice baggy fit.
 
Thanks for the back up, I had a 2 pairs of Oakley pants last year that were both XXL and both were smaller in length and waist than my 686 gear in size Large.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top