NSFW: Interesting article on gender biases

550x336px-LL-93d4d87c_South-Park-nice.jpeg
 
This is so stupid in my opinion. Yes, who doesn't like some titties? I'm all for boobs and how great they are. Yes, it's sucky to wear a bathing suit top and a bra and a shirt when it's hot as balls outside, but get over it. Woman's tits aren't nearly the same as a man's chest. Female boobs produce milk for children when child birth occurs...men's boobs don't. Our boobs are bigger and way more exciting. Keep them in your shirts unless you're thirsty as fuck. There's a time and place to dump 'em out. Walking down the streets in NY is not one of those places. If everybody did that, tits would be a lot less exciting and arousing to men and women in sexual situations. Keep them for pleasure and boners.
 
i somewhat agree, i think it's stupid if they arrest women who do this in public as they wouldnt arrest a man. but i agree that boobs are meant to be a little more special than a mans tits
 
I don't understand why it would be illegal to be naked in public in the first place. If they do it because it grosses people out, they should also arrest fat and ugly people because they gross me out.
 
i mean it's generally accepted that women cover their boobs and vaginas and men cover their penises. i don't understand how saying they suddenly don't have to cover their tits makes them no longer considered a "private area"

if you didn't want boobs to be covered you should've told the people thousands of years ago who started covering them in the first place
 
Ever seen the people who like to flaunt their bodies in public? They tend to not be quite what I would call "hot," "attractive," and even "human" is a stretch.
 
I've already begun developing boner-resistant pants with the intention of selling them in NYC. If you want in on the ground level of this business, contact me.
 
just because im topless and wearing nothing but booty shorts does not mean im asking for it!!!
 
you're telling me before now a female would get arrested for being topless in NY? how 20th century. it's been perfectly legal for females to do this for over 20 years where I live. It doesn't really change anything though. I've maybe seen a topless person downtown 2 or 3 times. and they're always some older hippy woman with saggy tits.
 
fuck that.

why is society trying to make it seem like a woman is the same thing as a man?

there is clearly a difference.

if we carry on like this then our fucking future = test tube babies and genderless beings.
 
Are you serious? Actually I'm pretty sure you're not I'm just to lazy to cancel out quote reply.

Why is this a big deal to some people? There's no actual reason boobs should be covered, its just a made up societal value that doesn't actually make much sense when you step back from what your mommy, daddy, or church taught you. 200 years ago women showing ankles was viewed the same way, why is this any more valid? Plenty of societies around the world don't expect women to cover their breasts and guess what? Once people get over it it's not a big deal.

Really boobs produce milk so they should be covered? What the fuck kind of logic is that?

Its pretty funny to me that people think that all their arbitrary social rules actually have some greater meaning.
 
So you say fat and ugly people gross you out and yet you'd be completely fine with it being legal for those fat and ugly people to walk around naked?

Aside from your severe shallowness, you also seem to be plagued with retardation.
 
No, he's not the kind of "retard" who thinks their opinion is the final word and should dictate how other people live their lives.

You on the other hand seem to be one of those "retards" that have an overly high opinion of the bullshit that spews out of their mouth....
 
So basically what you're saying is that people should be able to have sex in public, anywhere they wish? By your argument, anything having to do with that matter should be legal because it's just "nature".
 
Well yes, thats the implication of my argument but obviously there are good social reasons why having sex in public should be frowned on, I never said that because social rules are made up there's not good reasons for some of them. My argument is that I can't really see any compelling reason that women not wearing shirts in public will cause any harm once people get use to it and most of the arguments against it seem to be based on the idea that because it's a social rule it's natural and good for women not to expose their breasts. Have you ever been to a region where women don't cover their boobs? Once you get use to it, and it doesn't take long, its not a big deal at all. It's basically like being in the US, walk down the street, check out hot chicks with the difference being instead of wearing shirts that are designed to show off as much of their boobs as possible without fully exposing them they cut the crap, and ignore the older women.

Its not the same as going pant- less, boobs are sexy but they aren't sexual organs. The same arguments were probably used against women showing their ankles "oh women's legs are too sexual, society will go to hell if people can see them, what about the children, why would any self respecting women want to show people their legs?" When in reality it wasn't that big of a deal.

Oh and skiiermen you're right I was deeply offended. I'll get right to work on that growing up thing, although adding little bitch right after you told me to grow up was kind of ironic.
 
Back
Top