North America to be Destroyed

Chief.Woodcock

Active member
http://current.com/1emi04c

A dire report prepared for President Medvedev by Russia’s Ministry of Natural Resources

is warning today that the British Petroleum (BP) oil and gas leak in

the Gulf of Mexico is about to become the worst environmental

catastrophe in all of human history threatening the entire eastern half

of the North American continent with “total destruction”.

Russian scientists are basing their apocalyptic destruction

assessment due to BP’s use of millions of gallons of the chemical

dispersal agent known as Corexit 9500

which is being pumped directly into the leak of this wellhead over a

mile under the Gulf of Mexico waters and designed, this report says, to

keep hidden from the American public the full, and tragic, extent of

this leak that is now estimated to be over 2.9 million gallons a day.

The dispersal agent Corexit 9500 is a solvent originally developed by Exxon and now manufactured by the Nalco Holding Company

of Naperville, Illinois that is four times more toxic than oil (oil is

toxic at 11 ppm (parts per million), Corexit 9500 at only 2.61ppm). In

a report written by Anita George-Ares and James R. Clark for Exxon

Biomedical Sciences, Inc. titled “Acute Aquatic Toxicity of Three Corexit Products: An Overview

Corexit 9500 was found to be one of the most toxic dispersal agents

ever developed. Even worse, according to this report, with higher water

temperatures, like those now occurring in the Gulf of Mexico, its

toxicity grows.

The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in discovering BP’s use of this dangerous dispersal agent ordered BP to stop using it, but BP refused stating that their only alternative to Corexit 9500 was an even more dangerous dispersal agent known as Sea Brat 4.

The main differences between Corexit 9500 and Sea Brat 4 lie in how

long these dangerous chemicals take to degrade into their constituent

organic compounds, which for Corexit 9500 is 28 days. Sea Brat 4, on

the other hand, degrades into an organic chemical called Nonylphenol

that is toxic to aquatic life and can persist in the environment for

years.

A greater danger involving Corexit 9500, and as outlined by Russian

scientists in this report, is that with its 2.61ppm toxicity level, and

when combined with the heating Gulf of Mexico waters, its molecules

will be able to “phase transition”

from their present liquid to a gaseous state allowing them to be

absorbed into clouds and allowing their release as “toxic rain” upon

all of Eastern North America.

Even worse, should a Katrina like tropical hurricane form in the

Gulf of Mexico while tens of millions of gallons of Corexit 9500 are

sitting on, or near, its surface the resulting “toxic rain” falling

upon the North American continent could “theoretically” destroy all

microbial life to any depth it reaches resulting in an “unimaginable

environmental catastrophe” destroying all life forms from the “bottom

of the evolutionary chart to the top”.

Note: For molecules of a liquid to evaporate, they must be located

near the surface, be moving in the proper direction, and have

sufficient kinetic energy to overcome liquid-phase intermolecular

forces. Only a small proportion of the molecules meet these criteria,

so the rate of evaporation is limited. Since the kinetic energy of a

molecule is proportional to its temperature, evaporation proceeds more

quickly at higher temperatures.

As over 50 miles of the US State of Louisiana’s coastline has

already been destroyed by this spill, American scientists are warning

that the damage may be impossible to repair, and as we can read as

reported by the Associated Press News Service:

“The

gooey oil washing into the maze of marshes along the Gulf Coast could

prove impossible to remove, leaving a toxic stew lethal to fish and

wildlife, government officials and independent scientists said.

Officials are considering some drastic and risky solutions: They could

set the wetlands on fire or flood areas in hopes of floating out the

oil. They warn an aggressive cleanup could ruin the marshes and do more

harm than good.”

And to understand the full import of this catastrophe it must be

remembered that this disaster is occurring in what is described as the “biologically richest waters in America” with the greatest amount of oil and toxic Corexit 9500 set to come ashore in the coming days and weeks to destroy it completely for decades to come.

Reports are also coming from the United States that their government is secretly preparing to evacuate tens-of-millions of their citizens from their Gulf of Mexico States should the most dire of these scientific warnings start to come true.

To the greatest lesson to be learned by these Americans is that

their government-oil industry cabal has been just as destructive to

them as their government-banking one, both of which have done more to

destroy the United States these past couple of years than any foreign

enemy could dare dream was possible.

But to their greatest enemy the Americans need look no further than

their nearest mirror as they are the ones who allowed these monsters to

rule over them in the first place.
 
well shit. here i thought i had my whole life to try to make love to aimee but now i have to do it before it rains?! this makes things much more difficult for me...
 
hey hey i live in naperville lol, and my buddys dad works in human resource for NALCO... didn't read the rest of the article but i should ask him about the situation
 
Do you realize I didn't even read more than the first sentence? The fact that oil is spilling out of everywhere is a pretty shit deal though
 
Yeah it is, and believe me, I'm just as pissed off about it as anyone else

but still, "NORTH AMERICA IS GOING TO BE DESTROYED"

no.
 
If Russia nukes america, BP won't exist anymore. They'll pass on, and so will their oil leak : )
Problem solved, blow up the US!
 
chuck_norris_random_fact_generator_6_3957_2224_image_2578.jpg
 
to bad we'll just redirect the nuke to canada so we can have more room for all of our garbage, fat people, and more parking lots!

then we'll just move all the oily water to canada!!!

problem solved
 
shenanigans.jpg


but yeah although the oil spill is a terribly shitty deal and destructive to the environment on its own... I don't buy this.
 
But... Nobody attacks Canada. Nobody. You just don't do it. Besides, you'd probably be better off dead than dealing with the nuclear fallout. Canada would get the short end of the stick on that one.
 
Your right, if someone attacked Canada, their punishment could be they have to watch this 10 times...

 
you're quoting an abovetopsecret thread, a famous conspiracy theorist website, while calling me out as a conspiracy theorist in another thread..... i realize that it's calling this author a hoax, but still...
 
Well considering in working on this right now for BP and have access to exactly what is happening, all I can say is- this is all news to me!! Ha... False my friends. Go get a greasy frying pan and put some organic washing up liquid on it and watch what happens to the oil.... That's all it is. If you actually believe you would pour millions of gallons of a toxic chemical into the ocean, one that is synthetic and more toxic then the oil itself, as opposed to Just leaving the oil (a naturally forming fluid).... Well.... Have a little faith in the people working on this, me included!! I'm not some monster out to kill the earth?!? If this had happened off Iraq or Nigeria (which it does!) where most of your oil comes from that you all consume at an astronomical rate everyday in America- would you give a fuck? No. So sit your hypocritical asses down and support the guys trying to fix this. If you absolutely use no oil, or oil based products in your lifetime you can complain-but I know that nobody doesn't. Yes it's a shitty situation, but to me it sums America up- you want oil and all it brings but not on your doorstep? Well, newsflash-offshore California floats on an ocean of oil, and when needed, America will drill the fuck out of it, regardless of what the prius gang say. So get used to it, onshore peak oil has gone... It's all about offshore now. Oil for energy is only a small percentage too, so banging on about wind farms etc is pointless- mass energy future lies in natural gas, do you know how much oil is needed to build and run a windfarm?? Oil is used in just about everything you touch daily, that's what it is needed for. The oil price didn't crash recently because people stopped driving their cars, it was because global industrial manufacturing took a nose dive.

We will all learn from this and the mistakes made. To me, the gulf of mexico has always been a risk taking cowboy place, unfortunately it takes a big accident to change that culture- it happened in the North Sea with piper alpha when 167 guys died. Hopefully, it'll change attitudes to safety and processes here too.

Best way to deal with oil in the environment is nature itself. Millions of chemosynthetic ecosystems thrive on oil, I.e. Microbial breakdown is what needs to be harnessed here. Anyway. That made me laugh.
 
YES as soon as i read this thread i thought about H8CH and his response to this. I remember youre knowledge from the first thread about this and as soon as i read it i wanted to sent out a pokeball with him in it Go H8CH!! He used "possesion of mroe knowledge on the subject than you"!! It's super effective!!
 
fake story.

and the gulf isn't americas biologically richest waters. there is a huge deadzone their from eutrophication because of all the nitrates and phosphates running down the mississippi due to agriculture. the water is totally depleted of life sustaining oxygen.
 
I do!

1 5000 bbl/day well = 721 wind turbines running at max capacity.

the_more_you_know2.jpg


Well I guess that is the oil equivalent to a wind turbine not how much is used to create it. Also if this well is flowing 95 Mbbl/d like some "experts" say I am buying BP stock.
 
I'm happy you replied to this, you're my reliable source of intel. On the other hand, though, instead of tearing us all new ones (justified nonetheless), I'd like to know what is going on with the situation. What are you guys trying out? etc. Thanks for keeping us updated too.
 
I definitely agree with the using nature to solve the problem but is there anything you guys are looking into besides just "letting nature take care of it"? Say, along the lines of the biomimicry of oyster mushrooms, to help solve the situation?
 
Back
Top