No camber or no rocker ?

[daveSpaghetski]

I know that it's a strange question but

if you were forced to choose a type of ski to ski in all conditions from now on, would you prefer skiing skis with only camber and no rocker or skis with only rocker and no camber?

 

[r00kie]

No rocker hands down. For years people skied everything on full camber and can still be done. Full rocker is more limited in application IMO.

 

[hot.pocket]

Full rocker, 80% of the quiver is absent of camber already might as well keep the ball rolling.

 

[Darc]

From New Zealand, its pretty firm here a lot. Think id give the nod to camber, its hella fun on the hard pack and not terrible on small amounts of fresh snow. If i lived somewhere it snowed a lot id probably go rocker.

 

[WoFlowz]

Probably rocker I just prefer how they feel and definetly wouldn’t ski something under 100 underfoot also

 

[ski_salmon69]

Full rocker for sure. Maybe not the most practical in all situations, but i love the surfy fun feeling you get from it

 

[ericforman]

Full rocker and it ain’t close. Would probably not bother skiing on the worst 15% of CO days, but I already kind of do that.

 

[BradFiAusNzCoCa]

Camber. Can always + and - camber height and create some minimal rise. So many ways you can play with it.