New Section in Pics: Nature

[almostaskier]

I took some pictures today of some nature around where i live, and when it came to uploading them, i didn't know where to put them.

they're obviously not skiing, not really summer themed, not digital art, and in misc you can forget getting any feedback.

so i put them in the art section, which i think is more for the abek rail paintings and such, not for pictures of the sky or a flower.

So i was wondering, is it possible to have a "Nature" pics section, or something to that effect?

 

[eheath]

I think art works fine.

 

[BFINO13]

put it in art

 

[caro.dillon]

if you had a section for nature it wouldnt have many people upload in it, they just put it in art

 

[burr]

You would be suprized!

 

[Liam.]

i put some in digital art

 

[Ghst]

There's alot of Art photos in the digital art section lately

 

[eastAR5]

no thers one HUGE catagory missing....

PLACES

no its not people, its not MISC, its not rails and its not fucking art

 

[mattster]

damn dude, such a good idea !!!

we need a section for every noun, and every type of skiing (which we have)

people, places, things (or i guess misc works for that)

 

[SkiMN]

something more broad, to hold all the pics people take of shit not at all skiing related. Most of it doesnt fit in art, it just ends up there because nobody looks in misc. Maybe not places, but something that covers any picture you might take that isnt skiing, art, digital art, or for a thread.

 

[BusyJohnSohn]

how about just a photography section. And i mean like artistic photos that are artsy

 

[mattster]

art ?

 

[CooksCorner]

I agree with you, it is its own category and its broad enough to actually get people to put stuff in it.