New Photo Method

Steezula

Steezula

Member
What are you thinking? Good Bad? Sick Ugly?

778293794_f311f34485.jpg


752616125_602e12db5c.jpg


782848825_353e634e30.jpg


766847450_03db977b1e.jpg


778293630_b3c164da09.jpg


759792188_30c94a93a7.jpg


752559064_53b483a009-1.jpg


755146575_bd494a30f8.jpg
 
i think it would be flippin sick when used in moderation. If you chose the right shot it coud be hella dope.
 
this method deffinatly should not be over used or become to mainstream but everyonce in a while they are SO SICK. and its just a method i have found doing some playing around. so right now it looks how it looks kinda pencil / oil painty. hope you guys are diggin it.
 
in the right application, IE advertising, illustration or similar things, I realllllly like the concept. 

Being a photographer, I think that the essense of photography is capturing images with a camera and it's functions, (and if you shoot on film, printing processes).... So I don't think I would call that photogarphy, i would call it what you said, a "photo method" or a method of processing a digital image.

looks sick though, especially the clouds in the last image
 
i know this. and most people wouldnt get the difference of digital image and a photo. but good point and i understand. most of this is just for my own pleasure of playing with photos. so dont worry i still shoot normal photographs. as i am a PHOTOGRAPHER! as well!
 
I realllly like 3. It's way dope, and like others say, if used in moderation or an Ad. or something it could be awesome. Neat idea.
 
Ian wade is the reason I get up in the morning.

with that in the open, I really like all of them, except for the one of the car. 1,2,3 and 7 are really awesome. Well done!
 
agreed with everyone about not using it for photos in mags but maybe ads and definitely if everyone does it. gonna be gay and played. just thought i would share.
 
thanks fo rsharing, it's a cool process, nothing like much of the drastic photo filters that some people use. it's a relly cool looking image
 
hmm...looks too much like you went nuts with unsharp mask. i don't like it.

you are a good photographer though.
 
I kinda like the look on the dude with the pink coat, just minus the background. Do it Avedon style, that look on a white background has possibilities.

Quite a cheezy effect though, I must say, so definately use with some restraint..... also keep playing with it. I feel like with a little more subtlety it could really be killer.
 
I don't really like HDR (High Dynamic Range) photos all that much, they are too fake looking. Especially after you have tone-mapped them. Good effort though, I'm sure those pictures would be huge on Flickr. They love HDRs on that site.
 
HDR is great in theory, but the haloing that automated processes gives it just makes my head hurt. Doing it manually in photoshop would take a shitload of time, but the result would be much more natural looking.
 
I think what he meant was the 1st two, that have less of the effect, look like they were just over-sharpened.

It's kind of cool. I'm not much for making photos look like paintings, but maybe if it were used selectively it would work better for me.
 
Some times HDR is sick, sometimes it is too much, The second one and the one of the dudes face are cool, the other oens are all a little too much for me. 
 
Is there an alternative definition to HDR that I'm not aware of? None of these look like an high dynamic range image.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top