jibberjason
Active member
"and we aren't hijacking planes and holding people hostage or crashing them into buildings there is a very fine line between military action and terrorism...we are using military action and nothing else i agree that we are liberating iraq and our intentions are good"
So the United States can use military force to take over a country in the name of 'democracy' and 'free trade', or supply weapons and training to internal groups that will achieve the same goal. This will ultimatley be better for the inhabitants of those countries because we think they'll like it better once they get used to it? The US has done this in Nicaragua, Afghanistan, Cuba, Indonesia, etc. For a while, anything remotly socialist was a threat to western civilization. It's ok because the US has a military and their intentions are good?
So if Afghanistan, Cuba, and Nicaraugua, (and other countries that the US has either taken by force, or supported groups that took the country by force) suddenly got hold of a powerful army, and decided to bomb the US in the belief that they were 'freeing' the American people from the undemocratic Bush government and preventing the spread of neoliberalism thoughout the world, it would be justified? They would genuinly believer that they are doing good for the American people and the world. Would those actions be justified?
I'm not speaking specifically about US intervention in Afghanistan or Iraq, but speaking with regard to the wide range of similar actions the US has taken in the last half century, most of which aren't reported on by US media.
member number 1981
The FDA is bad.
				
			So the United States can use military force to take over a country in the name of 'democracy' and 'free trade', or supply weapons and training to internal groups that will achieve the same goal. This will ultimatley be better for the inhabitants of those countries because we think they'll like it better once they get used to it? The US has done this in Nicaragua, Afghanistan, Cuba, Indonesia, etc. For a while, anything remotly socialist was a threat to western civilization. It's ok because the US has a military and their intentions are good?
So if Afghanistan, Cuba, and Nicaraugua, (and other countries that the US has either taken by force, or supported groups that took the country by force) suddenly got hold of a powerful army, and decided to bomb the US in the belief that they were 'freeing' the American people from the undemocratic Bush government and preventing the spread of neoliberalism thoughout the world, it would be justified? They would genuinly believer that they are doing good for the American people and the world. Would those actions be justified?
I'm not speaking specifically about US intervention in Afghanistan or Iraq, but speaking with regard to the wide range of similar actions the US has taken in the last half century, most of which aren't reported on by US media.
member number 1981
The FDA is bad.