Well first off you are basing the criteria of an education off of acceptance rates, and let me remind you that acceptance rates for ivys are INCREDIBLY discriminated. Public universities have to have a higher acceptance rate the 6%, otherwise they'd be broke and shut down. Second off, Boulder has been claimed as a public ivy since it has some of the top 10 programs in the nation for engineering, business, architecture, and public policy. Those others frequently being in the top 10 just so happen to be ivys (harvard, brown, yale, WTFE).
Now, Utah has had programs in the top 20 such as specific medical programs (like podiatry, nutrition, really specific areas of study), environmental sciences, and computer sciences. The guys who essentially created PIXAR went to the U (look it up its tight).
all im saying is Utah has been compared to Boulder and Boulder has been ranked with Ivy leagues so yes, even though it has an 87% acceptance rate because NOBODY BESIDES SKIERS AND RESIDENTS apply, it still is a great school for your money that should not be discredited. Your getting the same education in some programs that ivy league schools are giving for $50,000 more and skiing is only 30 minutes away.
but unless you really dont plan on skiing what-so-ever and school is your only goal, then try and find somewhere else but if you NEED and LIVE for skiing and want a great education, then the U ain't half bad.
besides, I feel like half of NS is in SLC anyways.