N Then Skis First Newschoolers Thread Ever

nthenskis

New member
Hey y'all:o)

I just recently found a thread asking what N Then Skis are (https://www.newschoolers.com/forum/thread/842757/N-then-skis--Anyone-) and thought it'd be cool to chime in and give a chance for anybody with a question to ask me.

This is actually my first post on Newschoolers about the company besides pics, so I'll cover a few things, but hang on, because, as we elect another crazy person into office, and Rubbermaid continues contemplating Tupperware skis, I'm pretty fired up about my biggest passion in life not getting enough love, and this is going to get heated.

The basic story of N Then Skis is on our website athttp://www.n-thenskis.com but I can also answer questions via Newschoolers, FB (https://www.facebook.com/NThenSkis/) , Twitter (@kevintoddskier), or our Instagram (instagram.com/nthenskis), and am happy to anytime.

From the first thread I read, asking about price vs. durabilty, the response from Dylan was right. Our skis cost more than some (and still less than others), but when your skis last longer, you may feel it's worth it. Let me first say, I've had a few pairs of Surface, many many K2s, some Nordicas, a few Armadas, and a ton of Lines, that I do love the feel and design of, but I think the biggest problem with any ski, is more to do with overall durability, especially with how much we slam all of our skis on rails way more than we used to now (and we do it to pow skis too). There's alot of different skis out there, that can offer a lot of great things, but I think the single best thing I can say about our first models (both are park skis that can mob anywhere else too; a 173cm and a 183cm) is, through and through, they're extremely durable.

The very first pair of our skis, which I'm still riding to this day (find me at Arapahoe Basin right now, and soon Keystone, Loveland, and/or Copper, and I'll show you them), have over 230 days of aggressive riding on them so far, and are only recently starting to show signs of serious destruction (edge underfoot began cracking on day 215, there's an edge pushing out the tip a tiny bit finally starting day 220, and the shot to the base that happened from landing on an unseen rock off a cliff on day 40 is actually somehow still water-tight and not separating). I am also not the only one who's been on these skis. This one pair of the first skis (aka "Daddy's Speed Chariots" haha) have now been ridden by at least 15 other serious park riders, with roughly 30 cliff drops, 50 backflips, 30 front flips, 40+ rodeos/mistys, 30+ treetaps, and somewhere upwards of 2000 rail contacts on them. According to the Snowsports Industry of America as of 2016, the typical U.S. skier rides 30 days of the winter. I know, that's sad, and I would sure hope you all get out skiing more than that, but with 230 days on the first pair of skis now (exactly the same ski available on our site) and the skis finally starting to deconstruct, I can safely say these skis will offer more than 2 years of serious ride time (that's if you ride like a seriously possessed mad-man). And I would dare say, they should offer you more than 3 years of love, depending on how hard you ride. Now most companies warranty 1 year on manufacturer's defects, and we think we have a ski design that's better than most out there, so we're guaranteeing ours for two years. And over time I hope to up that to 3 years. Durability is the key.

N Then Skis is a down-to-earth "Micro-Brew" ski company and we think that's better for skiing. A really good thing to know about N Then Skis is "it's me". I'm your guy. If you've heard anything about us from anyone, you were most likely talking to me. I have no big advertising campaigns. We're not like the big sad companies I've looked up to my whole life until now, that are going to find ways to make things cheaper over time, have to ask themselves if this is profitable everyday, and are here to make $ instead of go skiing. I would actually LIKE to find the people who don't like our product; seriously. We're a team on this, if all I wanted was money; I wouldn't start a ski company, I'd do something more profitable! We're just a team on making better skis, folks. If we (yeah I want you to try them) can find things we don't like about the skis, then AWESOME, because that means we can go make them BETTER. Honestly it's in the name. I've create this first model (which so far have 99% great reviews). N Then we're gonna break 'em (still haven't). N Then we'll make them better. N Then we'll break those too! N Then we'll just keep improving and improving them until we are creating the best possible skis we can. And that's it. I just want to do this the rest of my life. Make some skis, N Then make them better, and repeat. It's simple. I'm not gonna lie or cheat anybody either, because this is as simple as being out there everyday and having fun LIVING this lifestyle as many days as I can. All I want is enough*, and as a photographer/producer, I actually do make enough $ to survive on already, so N Then Skis is for the love of being out there, skiing as many days and places as I can, and sharing skiing with as many people as I can in one lifetime. If I can help some skiers succeed faster at their dreams than I did too, I'm gonna do that as well. Some other companies may put on a suit and head to an office when they wake up; not me. I'll just be out there riding with you; hoping we can get some great shots of you and break a pair of skis today so we can improve them. It's that simple. Ski companies CAN be honest. With the rest of the world falling apart, I think this is the perfect time for a movement in skiing towards honesty and aligning itself, once again, with the core of its soul (before we're literally out of snow in another century). We could be the last skiers in history; so let's bring back the soul of skiing. Can we please? I think we can really do this, but it's gonna take alot of vans, PBR (for those of legal drinking age lol), and hot dogs to do it (hot dog skiers and for eating).

Seriously, folks, and anyone who may have stumbled onto this and made it this far through the read somehow, I must voice something here. I'm drawing a line in the sand, taking my side, and going one step further. It's time to start literally saying NO to companies not living what they preach, and yes to the soulful under-dogs. This industry was built on the savings of people who were in this for the love of skiing, being real ski bums, and not to make money (the goal only being "how can we do this the rest of our lives?" not "how do we make $?"). We all do this (live this life) for the love and for the fun of our sport, and sharing it with each other. If someone has a goal of making $ with a big business, the ski industry isn't even a good place for it, as it's a limited market anyways.

So here's my formal and humble "F-U" to the big dogs. Bigger companies who could soon create Tupperware skis, just may not have your best interests in mind.

To all the big companies that have 3, 4, and sometimes even 5, parent companies diluting their soul... If your company EVER, for even a second, had to ask yourself if the skiing division of the company was worth it (worth the $), you simply don't deserve to be here. If you've had to ask yourself that, then your company doesn't deserve to be apart of something so awesome, as the fun, community, and support we're experiencing while we're out there skiing. Cool building. That's a great office. Good job company. Nice abandoned historic island too. Do you guys even ski anymore? No I mean besides your team? No one huh?

If you want to simply make money, this isn't the industry to be in anyway (how about you go make hotels).

I created N Then because it's a passion of mine to create the best skis possible and skiing deserves everything I could ever give back to it. Honestly. Creating this first pair of skis, and then our two lengths of powder skis (in testing this year) is, and will be, my greatest achievement, in my life to this point. I couldn't be more proud to contribute any products to skiing's history, and will do so humbly, and with respect for our sport and everyone helping it happen everyday. We're all lucky we can do this; every skier of any level and every business of any level.

About sponsorships and helping aspiring riders succeed at their goals...

We received over 300 sponsorship applications this year, so in addition to our first Pro Team which we just announced, we will be creating a secondary team of The Fun Police. The Fun Police will give aspiring athletes a place to tell their story, build their fan-bases, and accomplish their goals, with guidance and help backed by our company. I want to teach other skiers that were in my shoes as a kid, trying to find a way to ski for a living, how to reach their goals faster than I could, and even how to make money from your skiing, so you can do even more, and have the tools to become as pro as you want some day. So if you haven't applied to sponsorship and would like to, please submit an application athttp://www.n-thenskis.com/sponsorships and even if you don't make our pro team, we could still have alot of fun skiing, filming/getting stills, traveling, and building your fan bases together, as a part of The Fun Police. Help us bring back fun.

Thanks for reading my post whoever may find this haha, and feel free to send any other questions,

Kevin Todd

Founder & Designer of N Then Skis

& Sheriff of The Fun Police
 
We use the U.S. based R.G.S. Technologies, who have many relationships, with many different manufacturers, all over the world. Working with RGS gave me the ability to test tons of different options easily, instead of being confined to one place, to find the single best materials and manufacturer humanly possible.
 
Calling out other ski companies, some of which have been around since the beginning of freeskiing, is very unprofessional and unnecessary in my mind. I read a post on facebook I believe you wrote just savagely bashing k2. They might be in a difficult spot right now but they have done more for freeskiing then you obviously are aware of. Best of luck.
 
As explained, we just started and so of course I agree, we haven't done or contributed anything yet. We just started out. We're a Micro-Brew Ski Company. What I have contributed today was my words because sitting back and watching is being part of the problem.

I'm sorry if anything is offensive to you. I've bought tons and tons of K2's throughout my whole life, riding them from age 3 on and for sure, as a lover of the sport and that company, it stings. As someone who hardly ever does stir the pot anyways, when life stings, sometimes even a simple ski bum should sting back, especially about something I love as much as skiing. I'm willing to stand for what I believe right now; for the same things that I think the company in question, used to stand for.

That company isn't who we should hate either, and hate won't get anyone anywhere. Only changing our behavior and more skiing will change this. Many companies can become casualties of those situations when being purchased and the only way to change big companies is by not supporting them. Whether it sounds crude or not, I'm making a stand not to support those kinds of operations anymore, and going a step further, to do as much to help young skiers have as bright of futures as possible.

I love the riders in this sport and many employees of these same companies too. Many are family. It's only a small handful of people who have the true say in a company being purchased or changed and it IS shame on them in our industry. But think, this post could get as popular as the most popular thread of all-time on Newschoolers without any exec ever even seeing it. And hey, this is the ski industry, not a mafia, so if my rant starts this conversation and we can continue it, then GREAT, maybe we can help things change. I say why not add one more rant to Newschoolers?
 
Stop spewing all the cumbaya shit man. Tell us something REAL about your chinese ski's at a premium price.

You are great at writing paragrpahs that don't actually say anything
 
Did I not answer your question? I talk about all construction in the post. I've been riding them nonstop since creating them, they came out really well, and they're really fun skis. That's really it. You don't have to like them. It's fine. I'm not forcing them on you.
 
13747977:nthenskis said:
Did I not answer your question? I talk about all construction in the post. I've been riding them nonstop since creating them, they came out really well, and they're really fun skis. That's really it. You don't have to like them. It's fine. I'm not forcing them on you.

Saying they lasted you a long time tells me nothing. I think you are under some impression that regurgitating antecdotal evidence passes for construction and design details.
 
Yeah, the post starts with a link to our site where you can read anything about the specifics too. Physically, our ski performs with more internal durability than I've found anywhere. Load and material tests calculate roughly a 2200 pound internal breaking strength if we could break them through in the center. I actually don't know what breaking strengths many other skis would have in this calculation, so the durability has been proven through testing them instead of directly comparing numbers.

I'm sorry but you literally told me to keep talking and also that I should shut up at the same time haha; that's a lil confusing. I'm only trying to put this post out there for anyone who hasn't heard anything about us yet. If you're not into our brand, that's fine and you really don't have to waste your time. We don't need to win over every single person and I ain't trying to be pushy about anything I'm saying here, so there's no need to be hostile.

This is skiing. It's for fun. Deep breathe.
 
Reposting again for ya bud:

We use the U.S. based R.G.S. Technologies, who have many relationships, with many different manufacturers, all over the world. Working with RGS gave me the ability to test tons of different options easily, instead of being confined to one place, to find the single best materials and manufacturer humanly possible.

They have manufactures all over and I can choose where they are made. The first pairs have come from Taiwan. I looked for the hands-down best production I could find for this particular ski and considered 13 options before deciding on this based only on quality. I don't want to make anything less than the best ski I can possibly make.
 
To be clear, if my favorite skis came from Pluto, they would still be my favorite skis.

Any company has to make a hard choice when starting out, of do they look for the best ski made within a certain area, or go out to find the single best combination of materials and production on our entire planet while accessing the most advanced manufacturing possible, instead? It is definitely a hard choice and neither option is perfect but I chose the latter and set out to create the hands-down best finished product I could, regardless, to start this company.

Over time, as we find places nationally that can produce the same quality, I do hope to have all production here in the U.S. but for now, that's a few ski sales and a little more U.S. production development, away. This is our first post. We've only been public since last January last winter, with only testing going on all year to make sure the skis were ready for now. I think we have a great product and we'll go from here to start.

I appreciate everyone's opinions though so keep them coming!
 
13747985:Session said:
Saying they lasted you a long time tells me nothing. I think you are under some impression that regurgitating antecdotal evidence passes for construction and design details.

Whenever i see you post on something about a new company you are just a prick about it. Chill the fuck out and stop blatantly hating. Its not even constructive criticism either, you just have to flame the shit out of them with no backing on why. Yea i get that supporting a company without knowing anything about them is whack, but hating on them to the point that you do is whack using the same principle.

I wouldnt even bother mentioning this if it wasnt in every post about a new company ive seen. It just degrades the quality of the thread and its annoying.

Past this i find you a great member in NS.
 
13748043:parkplayground said:
Whenever i see you post on something about a new company you are just a prick about it. Chill the fuck out and stop blatantly hating. Its not even constructive criticism either, you just have to flame the shit out of them with no backing on why. Yea i get that supporting a company without knowing anything about them is whack, but hating on them to the point that you do is whack using the same principle.

I wouldn't even bother mentioning this if it wasn't in every post about a new company I've seen. It just degrades the quality of the thread and its annoying.

Past this i find you a great member in NS.

Hey. Seriously Mr. Troll-Guy with great NS stats, I actually agree with you that supporting a company without knowing anything about them is whack; that's why I posted.

This post tells you alot about our company, what we'll be doing this year, and a serious glimpse into myself as an owner/passionate skier. Yes I get heated (if that's the part you didn't like) but I wouldn't take back anything any companies have contributed to our sport over the years, and I'm only getting heated in love for everything about our sport (and in frustration of missing many beautiful entities that have dissolved over time). Could even my company get bought some day? I don't know. Maybe it could too. That would be circumstantial as this is literally my biggest dream I have in my life (that I've saved for most of my life; my baby that I wouldn't ever let go). It would be really sad if that happened, and I'd do everything not to. But could it happen? In a crazy action-movie world, maybe. If I'm alive and breathing, I sure hope I wouldn't ever have a reason to. Sorry to anybody else who may have been offended, who didn't voice it.

For now, this post is my stand and I'm personally choosing to change my own habits while inviting you to change yours as well. You can choose to join or not and if no, that's cool; maybe we'll gain your support or business down the road, instead.

To start this business, I think this is a great post of a conversation beginning, even if it's mostly one guy who hates everybody. But whatever, I didn't even know he does that because I've been busy getting ready for winter (and skiing most days); hey thanks anyways Mr. Hater-Dude for getting right down to it.

People wanted answers to those questions either way and now we can simply continue the conversation constructively, with less hostility, like ^this smart guy^ just suggested.

Anything from anyone else? Haha. Anyone reading, with a less "on trial"-feeling question to loosen things up? Haha, I'm listening.
 
13748036:nthenskis said:
To be clear, if my favorite skis came from Pluto, they would still be my favorite skis.

Any company has to make a hard choice when starting out, of do they look for the best ski made within a certain area, or go out to find the single best combination of materials and production on our entire planet while accessing the most advanced manufacturing possible, instead? It is definitely a hard choice and neither option is perfect but I chose the latter and set out to create the hands-down best finished product I could, regardless, to start this company.

Over time, as we find places nationally that can produce the same quality, I do hope to have all production here in the U.S. but for now, that's a few ski sales and a little more U.S. production development, away. This is our first post. We've only been public since last January last winter, with only testing going on all year to make sure the skis were ready for now. I think we have a great product and we'll go from here to start.

I appreciate everyone's opinions though so keep them coming!

Keep in mind that quality is not the only reason why people like to invest in US-produced skis. It's great that a ski can be produced in Taiwan or China that exceeds standards set by locally made skis, but at what expense? Sourcing from overseas can often imply irresponsibly sourced materials and waste management, unfair labor, and I think it separates a brand from a ski. A major reason why people prefer locally built skis is because it feels better to pay for a product that was hand built by people with the same passion. I think that the argument you make against big ski corporations is diluted under the consideration that your skis aren't locally manufactured.

Also, I don't think that the graphics are that outstanding. I realize you're focused on durability, which is great, but I think it would be a good move to contract or hire someone to design the graphics.

I don't mean to sound negative. It's cool that you're taking an initiative to fix a problem you see in the existing industry, I'm only pointing out a few things that I don't think are as solid.
 
13748119:toast said:
Keep in mind that quality is not the only reason why people like to invest in US-produced skis. It's great that a ski can be produced in Taiwan or China that exceeds standards set by locally made skis, but at what expense? Sourcing from overseas can often imply irresponsibly sourced materials and waste management, unfair labor, and I think it separates a brand from a ski. A major reason why people prefer locally built skis is because it feels better to pay for a product that was hand built by people with the same passion. I think that the argument you make against big ski corporations is diluted under the consideration that your skis aren't locally manufactured.

Also, I don't think that the graphics are that outstanding. I realize you're focused on durability, which is great, but I think it would be a good move to contract or hire someone to design the graphics.

I don't mean to sound negative. It's cool that you're taking an initiative to fix a problem you see in the existing industry, I'm only pointing out a few things that I don't think are as solid.

At what expenses is a great point. All companies need to consider all of these factors when making these hard decisions and it definitely ain't easy. For myself, creating the best ski I could was first, because if I couldn't create a ski that was worthy, than I wouldn't want to do this. Then I also have goals of having my dream manufacturer produce them here as well.

My argument is in frustration of bigger companies getting diluted and not in where they produce their skis. I do understand your point, but it's true a large or small company could be producing in the U.S., or elsewhere, and it doesn't relate to if that company has been bought out a bunch of times or not (what I'm venting about in the post).

It's just sad to see. I'll get over it. Maybe I'm too quick to vent too but I seriously wanted to say this last month and still waited until now to think it through. Maybe I'll lose some followers when I voice my opinions but hopefully those who see where my heart is, will join us in a positive movement for fun instead.
 
13748043:parkplayground said:
Whenever i see you post on something about a new company you are just a prick about it. Chill the fuck out and stop blatantly hating. Its not even constructive criticism either, you just have to flame the shit out of them with no backing on why. Yea i get that supporting a company without knowing anything about them is whack, but hating on them to the point that you do is whack using the same principle.

I wouldnt even bother mentioning this if it wasnt in every post about a new company ive seen. It just degrades the quality of the thread and its annoying.

Past this i find you a great member in NS.

Sorry, I require more than "they are rad" from the guy who owns the "company". Seen so many come and go.

And beyond Poplar core, P-tex sidewalls(yuck), and basic dimensions, nothing has really been presented. Not to mention 900 bucks for Taiwanese ski's is laughable.

I feel like it's just another case of some trustafarian trying to low key own a ski company without putting much effort in to it. And I think that only gives the true small ski builders busting ass to put out good domestic product a bad rap.
 
13748143:Session said:
Sorry, I require more than "they are rad" from the guy who owns the "company". Seen so many come and go.

And beyond Poplar core, P-tex sidewalls(yuck), and basic dimensions, nothing has really been presented. Not to mention 900 bucks for Taiwanese ski's is laughable.

I feel like it's just another case of some trustafarian trying to low key own a ski company without putting much effort in to it. And I think that only gives the true small ski builders busting ass to put out good domestic product a bad rap.

I'm actually the designer of the skis I'm talking about, not just an owner, if somehow I didn't mention that. The whole company is me, like I said in the post.

Hey I still appreciate your input Session$, respect your opinion, and defend your right to say it. Cereal.
 
13748143:Session said:
Sorry, I require more than "they are rad" from the guy who owns the "company". Seen so many come and go.

And beyond Poplar core, P-tex sidewalls(yuck), and basic dimensions, nothing has really been presented. Not to mention 900 bucks for Taiwanese ski's is laughable.

I feel like it's just another case of some trustafarian trying to low key own a ski company without putting much effort in to it. And I think that only gives the true small ski builders busting ass to put out good domestic product a bad rap.

See this ^ is fine to me since you atleast gave reasoning behind it. Whether i agree or disagree, this is useful input. Appreciated
 
13748183:Swandog7 said:
Can a mod please change the thread title to "tear my ass apart about my company"

Lol. I'm okay with that admin. Crazy gauntlet tests are chill. Nothing worth doing is easy anyways and I already learned that years ago.

I've had plenty of harder jobs before, than arguing about stuff I love. And knew I left this post on Newschoolers.com when I made it. I'm still here.
 
13748183:Swandog7 said:
Can a mod please change the thread title to "tear my ass apart about my company"

Lol. I'm okay with that admin. Crazy gauntlet tests are chill. Nothing worth doing is easy anyways and I already learned that years ago.

I've had plenty of harder jobs before, than arguing about stuff I love. And knew I left this post on Newschoolers.com when I made it. I'm still here.
 
I don't know how you really expect people to pay $900 for a ski that they know nothing about from a company that they know nothing about... what makes your poplar core better than someone elses? How thick are the edges, what is the rocker profile, and da fuck are ptex sidewalls
 
Not trying to hate or anything but like everyone else is saying. Why do you have your skis priced more than any park ski I've ever seen?

You have no one except for yourself backing your claims of the ski being "bombproof".

As a new company I see your approach to the industry as a "core true to roots" company but if you really were "for the skiers" you wouldn't be charging people almost $1000. For a pair of skis that have no backing.
 
13748488:KyleA said:
Care to elaborate on your dislike of UHMW sidewalls?

When someone just says P-Tex for sidewalls I only think of Icelantics application which I think looks like shit.
 
13748497:Session said:
When someone just says P-Tex for sidewalls I only think of Icelantics application which I think looks like shit.

Alright, so what do you think a great ski should have material-wise? Please dont say what ON3P, Moment, etc. do. even if its the same process, I want to hear what you think makes a good ski a good ski based off of material and construction.

To OP, there are quite a few points brought up regarding pricing and specifics of the skis.

-base/edge thickness

-specific build processes (especially if patented) showing why your skis are so durable when referring to your claims about them

-what actually makes them $900? park skis are known for not being worth putting serious tech into since they inevitably blow up within a season or 2 if you ride hard. Yes there are exceptions (HG, ON3P, Icelantic), but they can still price competitively while having brand backing.

-video proof of riding would also be helpful
 
13748497:Session said:
When someone just says P-Tex for sidewalls I only think of Icelantics application which I think looks like shit.

The appearance of a UHMW sidewall is more so attributed to the finishing process rather than the material. I haven't paid much attention to Icelantic skis recently, but the Never Summer factory always seems to put a decent finish on the skis and boards they put out. In terms of material properties, you aren't going to find a material that is as abrasion resistant, hydrophobic and elastic, especially in cold temperatures, as UHMW.

Your other opinions are valid, so carry on.
 
I've just been skimming, but your skis dont look very promising.

So far all I know about them is they are made in Taiwan and they 800 fucking dollars, wait no 900 for an extra 10 cm of the same ski with a different name. What the fuck? You are fucking trying to charge people 100 dollars for 100mm. Fucks sake man I can get a pair of carbon DPS's for 900.

And on top of all of this you are claiming that these nearly symmetrical 89 underfoot park shape with poplar core, which is light, floppy, and not very durable, can "bomb carves" in crud and handle "deep" pow skiing with their "slight" early rise. Have you ever skied a real crud charger or a fat pow ski?

Biggest factor in ski durability imo is the base, that's what on the snow, that's what can make a ski faster, and that's what has to take the hits when half the mountain is covered in sharks. You tell us nothing about what base material you are using or how thick it is, it's not even mentioned. However you do mention that your skis have ptex sidewalls, that shit is barely even important and you included that info but not the fucking base material? There are definitely some other companies that are guilty of this but you are marketing yourself as a bombproof micro brew. The gear snobs like me that give a shit about micro brew skis like to know this stuff.

Seriously man what the fuck are you doing? I'm just trying to help you out because this little project of yours sounds half assed as fuck, do better.
 
You seem to be boasting the durability of your skis quite a bit. After skimming the website, all I could find is that all other skis tend to fall apart quickly and that yours don't, without any reasons behind why nthen skis don't fall apart.

What makes them bombproof? Do you have a basic layup you could explain? i.e. base with edges then rubber then type x fiberglass with/without carbon stringers then rubber then core made of x wood then etc... (preferably a little more in depth but you get the point)

Also, how are they holding up during testing? The website just says it's hard to break them without a chainsaw followed by a bunch of pictures and a few clips, which seems vague.

Finally, what warrants the jump in price between the sizes? An extra 10cm of material doesn't seem like $100.
 
There's a lot of feedback here and I'm thankful to hear all of it. You've all brought some great questions and points. As I read through since my last response, there are tons of questions being repeated, as well as ones that were already answered here, as well as some questions that are getting so specific as to materials, that I'd suggest researching materials used in skis in general for more information. My goal isn't teach you how to make a ski in this thread, but rather answer questions regarding our products.

To answer, and also repeat again because this is even already mentioned in the very first thread I found mentioning us... I think our prices are reflective of the durability of our finished product.

P-Tex has been used in all different ways in sidewalls (and many skis, some good and some bad, use variations of P-Tex in their skis in sidewalls; that's not new). If we just didn't use the word P-Tex, like other companies, why is that any better?

Again, I believe the overall durability of a ski is something that proves itself on the slopes, after tons and tons of impacts on rails, kickers, trees, cement wall-rides, and everything else, over time.

When asking...

Why our skis are durable?

How they different from others?

Why we think the price is justified when you buy less skis?

And what makes ours different?

I'm asking for these readers to please refer to the original post again, which specifies almost exactly how much abuse, time, and everything we do skiing this pair of skis, has been through (flips, rails, ride days, etc. are all explained clearly).

That is my answer to ALL of those questions. Before responding angrily, let me explain again, I have NEVER had ANY pair of skis be able to stand that abuse before. That's it. I can do machine tests on materials all day without knowing that after 230 days being completely slaughtered every chance they've had, these skis are still riding everyday.

I'm not delving deeper into a scientific meaning of these results because they're simple; these outlasted every other ski I'd ever had. I'm proud for sure. These are the results. We can all look at, and interpret them, all the different ways we like but when it comes down to it, I love these skis we made, because they've proved themselves.

Thanks again for your comments and questions! Despite many of your clear attempts to make a new companies' post turn into some kind of argument, I think you all still ask a lot of the right questions. It's okay if I don't win over all the angry skiers; we're not going to be for everybody. If the quality of a new company (that isn't forcing you to read anything-we even have zero advertising) is going to infuriate you, in even the slightest, we aren't the ski for you. We're all about fun. And I never said "we're perfect", I said "we're new", which is actually quite the opposite. Yes I said we're durable too.

Although they may not make themselves heard, some of you reading, that appreciate a ski lasting longer than you expected under the abuse, understand that a ski you buy less times, costs you less. We're here for you.
 
13749950:nthenskis said:
I'm not delving deeper into a scientific meaning of these results because they're simple; these outlasted every other ski I'd ever had. I'm proud for sure. These are the results. We can all look at, and interpret them, all the different ways we like but when it comes down to it, I love these skis we made, because they've proved themselves.

This isn't scientific at all, you're not delving deeper because there isn't any science to it?
 
13749957:nutz. said:
This isn't scientific at all, you're not delving deeper because there isn't any science to it?

Hey I gotta ask you read the whole post first. The "results" I'm referring to are all clearly written in the post. I'm referring to all of the things the skis gone through in testing. Recording every single flip, rail, day ridden, etc (more stats listed above) and every single piece of damage to the ski and exactly when, is the science my last post is referring to.

Please read the post before assuming I'm referring to nothing folks. Please:o)!
 
13750041:kung_powpow said:
and all of our questions are still left unanswered...

I wasn't going to say anything here, but that last post answered NONE of the questions. Wtf? People are asking for how the skis are built, etc. to see what makes them special and you didn't give an answer! If you want to start a company, you can't dodge every question, that's just sketchy. Give people a reason to buy your ski, aside from personal opinion. Why should we believe you?
 
13748896:hot.pocket said:
What makes them bombproof? Do you have a basic layup you could explain? i.e. base with edges then rubber then type x fiberglass with/without carbon stringers then rubber then core made of x wood then etc... (preferably a little more in depth but you get the point)

Finally, what warrants the jump in price between the sizes? An extra 10cm of material doesn't seem like $100.

13749950:nthenskis said:
My goal isn't teach you how to make a ski in this thread, but rather answer questions regarding our products.

Why our skis are durable?

How they different from others?

If the quality of a new company (that isn't forcing you to read anything-we even have zero advertising) is going to infuriate you, in even the slightest, we aren't the ski for you.

Although they may not make themselves heard, some of you reading, that appreciate a ski lasting longer than you expected under the abuse, understand that a ski you buy less times, costs you less. We're here for you.

Neither of my questions were answered...I'm not angry or acting aggressively, just some things I'd like to know.

What materials go into your skis? I can find out what is in basically every ski companies ski on the market, except yours.

What warrants a jump in price? An extra 10cm of material doesn't cost an extra $100.

Also, I would like to read about your company. Not the backstory or the micro-brew stuff, but what processes you're using to build your skis and what materials are going into them. Not a lot of people want to invest in a new (and expensive) ski that has almost no information behind it. There's a super thread on how to build skis, I'm not interested in a step by step, but how does your construction differ from other manufacturers that benefits the durability of your ski?

Have you tested more than just the one pair that you've been riding 200+ days? You talk of scientific testing and such, yet 1 is an incredibly small sample size.
 
I've never heard of a startup ski company that doesn't build their own skis. That would be like if I started a brewery and pawned off the beer making on someone else.
 
13750269:Casey said:
I've never heard of a startup ski company that doesn't build their own skis. That would be like if I started a brewery and pawned off the beer making on someone else.

My sarcasm meter might be broken, but Armada, 4frnt, DPS, J Skis, HG, Revision, Stanston, Ninthward, Vishnu, Icelantic, RMU, H2Og, Worth, Caravan. Those are just some of the start ups or were start ups in the last 13 years that pawned their ski making off on others.
 
13750354:KyleA said:
My sarcasm meter might be broken, but Armada, 4frnt, DPS, J Skis, HG, Revision, Stanston, Ninthward, Vishnu, Icelantic, RMU, H2Og, Worth, Caravan. Those are just some of the start ups or were start ups in the last 13 years that pawned their ski making off on others.

I get what your saying, but take sterbenz and levinthal for example, both built skis themselves in the early days of line and 4frnt. I'm not saying it's bad to use a factory I am just commenting that it's weird for a person to start a ski company when he doesn't build skis.
 
Hey. Everybody.

We've all loved and hated a lot of shit through the years. You just can't know what you love in a ski, till you ride it. I may not have started with a ski that's even something you like; it's whatever. My company can only grow at a small speed; that's the only plan. I don't care equally about some ski I don't know, but not voicing my opinion, is worse than putting it out there and getting all kinds of rad responses.

To those who think I'm full of it; great dude.

To those who give us a chance, I say let's go have some fun.

If you would honestly judge my ski, after we get through setting up demos for anybody wherever (like I'd personally drive to alot of you just to hear your opinion), then we can get past talking about "before ever trying it" idealism.

And honestly, those of you who have no clue you sound like it, you are epitomizing the modern term of "The Jaded Local". You'll only understand by trying DUDE, so be freakin open to it.

Sorry to piss off more of you with another post. I hope those, who are clearly interested, understand that this (our lives) is meant to be for FUN, and ENJOYMENT, and openness to ALL of our ideas about how to live!

N Then Skis thinks "If you're having fun, you're doing it right," should be used more in our industry than it used to.

Either way, shred hard. I'll see you on the slopes.

-KT of N Then
https://www.instagram.com/p/BNKPotPh1GQ/
 
13754308:nthenskis said:
N Then Skis thinks "If you're having fun, you're doing it right," should be used more in our industry than it used to.

Plenty of people still go by this and a good portion of ski companies make skis because that's what they love to do. There's not a whole lot of money to be made making skis...
 
Back
Top