I dunno.. it's hard, even for me to imagine. The division of land is a form of heiarchy that doesn't benefit the majority of the world imo. As well, rules are created by the majority of people wanting them to exist; meaning to me that if they didn't exist, people would act the same. People would still treat others badly, but the problem of crime to me seems commonly to be out of nessesity. So if we stopped a small majority from unfairly owning land/ways to make the products that we need, people could work and earn a more representative wage. For example the value of labour of the average worker is 7 times higher than their salary. If there was no heirarchy, and people could choose to work and earn on whatever projects they needed to or wanted to, it really would be a true and active democracy, and people would have to work less, or they could have more. It's pretty radical but it has worked for periods of years in countries like spain after the revolution