Movies "Made" by someone

I know what... write him a letter asking him, because obviously the numerous explinations we have provided are not good enough for you. You just don't get it, as I said before, it's like kicking a dead horse.
 
But Johnny doesn't yell cut at every single shoot. He isnt even there. And what, does he tell Candide to cross his skis a little more, or to tweak it a little more? He doesnt have anything to do with what actually goes on in the movie. Maybe he sets up a trip or shoot here and there, but he doesn't tell the athletes what to do like a real director does.

And if I'm a dead horse, then Melvs, you're a dead cow. You "explanations" are just excuses.

The only one who's posted anything good here, was Berman.
 
i meant this guy

i3cd5e.jpg
 
Actually he does consdering he has the final decision on every shot that goes in that movie. And I don't think any of these guys claimed to be a director, so there goes your point about him telling Candide what kind of trick he should do.

All these guys are simply saying that they have creative control over the turnout of the film/video/hi-def file and they are the ones that are ultimately in charge.

Your starting a pointless battle where no matter what youre gonna lose. There is a reason why there are credits at the end of the movie, to give credit to all the people who helped out, no matter if it wa just one single shot or to the person who edited it.
 
you are being a fucking retard simply put.

making a movie is very similar to taking a picture. are you going to say that the pictures you see in magazines could have been captured by anybody, and that its not the photographer that made the picture but rather the skiier? no. the photographer or the film maker set them selves to get the shots they do.

an eric iberg film may not be entirely shot by eric ibreg, but he does do the majority of the shots, and he has the final decision on what shots go in and what shots do not.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top