Mount point on blade optics

TastyJudo

New member
Hey!

Have anyone experimented with the mount point of the line blade optic 104s? I just copped the 178s and they look so nice at around -4cm with the rocker but im not sure because of the metal.

Any clues?
 
I had mine +2 from rec for a while (-5 from core I think) and I liked em. I was doing all mountain with a sprinkle of park though and have since moved to rec mount. - 4 from core is fine if you trying to do some more park on them
 
topic:TastyJudo said:
Hey!

Have anyone experimented with the mount point of the line blade optic 104s? I just copped the 178s and they look so nice at around -4cm with the rocker but im not sure because of the metal.

Any clues?

-4 is a sick spot for that ski, it charges real hard and grips real good on soft snow but it’s still super playful and balanced
 
14585587:Juviticus said:
I had mine +2 from rec for a while (-5 from core I think) and I liked em. I was doing all mountain with a sprinkle of park though and have since moved to rec mount. - 4 from core is fine if you trying to do some more park on them

I will not visit the park more than the last laps of an amazing day. Do you think i compromise alot of downhill performance at +2?
 
14585680:animator said:
-4 is a sick spot for that ski, it charges real hard and grips real good on soft snow but it’s still super playful and balanced

thanks! So i wont comprimize too much of downhill performance by going +2/3cm?
 
14586060:TastyJudo said:
thanks! So i wont comprimize too much of downhill performance by going +2/3cm?

It's really specifically the carving performance, like you won't be able to drive the tips to get the edges to lock up to the same degree in a carve. You'll have to be more upright which will limit edge hold/stability at high speeds

**This post was edited on Jan 30th 2024 at 4:31:02pm
 
Dead center mount.

Seriously though, probably go with the recommended mount point? If you want to be more than 1-2cm forward of that buy a freestyle oriented ski.
 
Back
Top