Mary Trump tell-all paints president as a ‘narcissist’ who is ‘lost to his own delusional spin

[dolanslebensraum]

Also monseur potato, im sure right now you are panicking and pming the mods to delete this thread because its very clear to everybody reading this that i am defending the more reasonable and pragmatic point of view and you are desperately using your appeal to authority logical fallacy to excuse your point of view from facing logical criticism. “Hurr derr bost beer revews hurr durr you has no ebidence hurr durr hurr hurr you are a raycist hurr hurr”

you are a snitching rat bitch for doing so and so is anybody else who goes bawling to the mods begging them to delete a thread where they lost a politically charged argument.

you would probably agree to working with police and do a controlled buy on your dealer to get yourself out of trouble with the cops from a minor possession charge. And then when your dealer gets out of prison and shoots you 5 times you will probably lay there feeling sorry for yourself as you bleed out, wondering what you did to deserve this, and all the while God would be grinning ear to ear watching your snitch ass die while eating popcorn, because He verifiably hates snitches, just as any honorable god would.

but thats assuming God is even aware that you monseur potato exist; he probably isnt.

**This post was edited on Jul 19th 2020 at 1:58:14am

 

[dolanslebensraum]

Lol princeton? Barely top 10. No one forces anyone to get peer-reviewed. It's a choice. And you didn't go to princeton

Princetons per capita endowment is almost 2 times the size of 2nd place harvard.

and regarding physics and astrophysics princeton has been the epicenter of that world ever since einstein chose princeton to be his home in the US.

also is there a reason you doubt my timestamped diploma picture? You think my dad went or something? If he did it would be almost the same either way bc iq is highly heritable.

but ill make you a deal inferior boy:

ill take a bunch of pictures of the princeton alumni weeklys that come every week, letters from my eating club, letters for reunions and annual givings, and anything else that seems to be good evidence, as long as you quit newschoolers, leave forever and never come back.

if youre so sure i didnt go there inferiorboy, then im sure you will be willing to make that bet.

hmmm...

hmmm...

hmmmmm........ not so sure anymore are we now haha

 

[dolanslebensraum]

Didn't someone call you out in another thread to post your diploma?

Yeah. And i did.
https://www.newschoolers.com/forum/thread/877113/Smartest-On-NS-?page=2

 

[Lonely]

Princetons per capita endowment is almost 2 times the size of 2nd place harvard.

and regarding physics and astrophysics princeton has been the epicenter of that world ever since einstein chose princeton to be his home in the US.

also is there a reason you doubt my timestamped diploma picture? You think my dad went or something? If he did it would be almost the same either way bc iq is highly heritable.

but ill make you a deal inferior boy:

ill take a bunch of pictures of the princeton alumni weeklys that come every week, letters from my eating club, letters for reunions and annual givings, and anything else that seems to be good evidence, as long as you quit newschoolers, leave forever and never come back.

if youre so sure i didnt go there inferiorboy, then im sure you will be willing to make that bet.

hmmm...

hmmm...

hmmmmm........ not so sure anymore are we now haha

I did a reverse image search......uhhh

 

[dolanslebensraum]

I'm going to just copy paste myself here since you're still deflecting:

- You made a claim that there is causation between race and intelligence

- Burden of proof is on you

- You failed to provide any data or facts to back up your claim

I see you're now switching to ad hominem attacks to try and keep deflecting, interesting.

Looking forward to your reply.

You already know the facts about iq gaps. They even went over different ethnicities avg iqs on the morgan freeman through the wormhole show on the discovery channel.

nobody will argue that there arent iq gaps between ethnicities. You may try to bury that fact but you arent so fucking stupid that you think you can data massage the rock hard statistics until they fit your narrative.

The burden of proof is on you, because its much more reasonable and straight forward to expect different people to have different Iq/intelligence potential. That is glaringly obvious because intelligence is a typical trait like adult height or athleticism. Those things can be accentuated by drinking milk as a kid or working out, but the potential for things like these traits is fixed and based on which of your grandparents chromosomes you ended up with and, to a variable effect, mutations.

it makes no sense to come up with a batshit autistic assumption that intelligence is special and is exactly the same for everybody.

Nobody would ever tell you that its reasonable to think everybody has the same potential and stupid people could have become physics professors but they were too lazy and didnt learn enough. That idea is fatally obtuse and it just makes you look full of shit to everybody.

prove to me why we should expect intelligences to be the same, based on reason and patterns seen in science.

science has proven itself to almost always hurt peoples feelings as opposed to coddling them and comforting them. So in this case the a priori assumption should be that science is going to hurt peoples feelings again regarding the genetics of iq.

**This post was edited on Jul 19th 2020 at 2:31:33am

 

[snowfinder]

This kind of thinking is just pointless. You come up with a racist idea, you support your racist ideas by linking to racist bloggers. Then flip it around and make everyone else prove you are wrong when no one set out or had attention in doing so. You're like a flat earthers but racist.

You already know the facts about iq gaps. They even went over different ethnicities avg iqs on the morgan freeman through the wormhole show on the discovery channel.

nobody will argue that there arent iq gaps between ethnicities. You may try to bury that fact but you arent so fucking stupid that you think you can data massage the rock hard statistics until they fit your narrative.

The burden of proof is on you, because its much more reasonable and straight forward to expect different people to have different Iq/intelligence potential. That is glaringly obvious because intelligence is a typical trait like adult height or athleticism. Those things can be accentuated by drinking milk as a kid or working out, but the potential for things like these traits is fixed and based on which of your grandparents chromosomes you ended up with and, to a variable effect, mutations.

it makes no sense to come up with a batshit autistic assumption that intelligence is special and is exactly the same for everybody.

Nobody would ever tell you that its reasonable to think everybody has the same potential and stupid people could have become physics professors but they were too lazy and didnt learn enough. That idea is fatally obtuse and it just makes you look full of shit to everybody.

prove to me why we should expect intelligences to be the same, based on reason and patterns seen in science.

science has proven itself to almost always hurt peoples feelings as opposed to coddling them and comforting them. So in this case the a priori assumption should be that science is going to hurt peoples feelings again regarding the genetics of iq.

**This post was edited on Jul 19th 2020 at 2:31:33am

 

[Monsieur_Patate]

Also monseur potato, im sure right now you are panicking and pming the mods to delete this thread because its very clear to everybody reading this that i am defending the more reasonable and pragmatic point of view and you are desperately using your appeal to authority logical fallacy to excuse your point of view from facing logical criticism. “Hurr derr bost beer revews hurr durr you has no ebidence hurr durr hurr hurr you are a raycist hurr hurr”

you are a snitching rat bitch for doing so and so is anybody else who goes bawling to the mods begging them to delete a thread where they lost a politically charged argument.

you would probably agree to working with police and do a controlled buy on your dealer to get yourself out of trouble with the cops from a minor possession charge. And then when your dealer gets out of prison and shoots you 5 times you will probably lay there feeling sorry for yourself as you bleed out, wondering what you did to deserve this, and all the while God would be grinning ear to ear watching your snitch ass die while eating popcorn, because He verifiably hates snitches, just as any honorable god would.

but thats assuming God is even aware that you monseur potato exist; he probably isnt.

**This post was edited on Jul 19th 2020 at 1:58:14am

Still deflecting I see. Your new angle: NS conspiracy against you to have you silenced based on my "snitching"? Interesting.

No one is snitching or trying to silence you bud. I don't think anything you posted should warrant deletion tbh (and I don't think anything has been deleted either, so not sure where that's coming from). Sure it's pretty bigoted, but I wouldn't think that qualifies as hate speech, it's ignorant speech for sure tho, but anyone with the ability to understand how logic and facts work can see through your desperate attempts to flip the narrative and save face.

Loved your fantasy of me getting shot 5 times tho, you sound pretty desperate. Let's recap where we are:

- You made a claim that there is causation between race and intelligence

- Burden of proof is on you

- You failed to provide any data or facts to back up your claim

 

[dolanslebensraum]

Still deflecting I see. Your new angle: NS conspiracy against you to have you silenced based on my "snitching"? Interesting.

No one is snitching or trying to silence you bud. I don't think anything you posted should warrant deletion tbh (and I don't think anything has been deleted either, so not sure where that's coming from). Sure it's pretty bigoted, but I wouldn't think that qualifies as hate speech, it's ignorant speech for sure tho, but anyone with the ability to understand how logic and facts work can see through your desperate attempts to flip the narrative and save face.

Loved your fantasy of me getting shot 5 times tho, you sound pretty desperate. Let's recap where we are:

- You made a claim that there is causation between race and intelligence

- Burden of proof is on you

- You failed to provide any data or facts to back up your claim

You keep ignoring what i say in my posts.

the burden of proof should always follow occams razor and assume the most logical hypothesis is correct.

its about 1000 times more logical to assume different people have different intelligence potential just like almost any other trait as opposed to nature giving a single fuck about the feelings of certain humans.

so the burden of proof is clearly on you because your hypothesis is far less reasonable than mine.

by your logic, we should assume that all humans athletic/sports potential is the same.

in fact, im going to sue the NBA for not drafting me to play for a professional basketball team, because my lack of basketball skill is due to oppression by black people who discriminated against me being white and this kept me from becoming a good athlete. I could have been just as athletic as kobe bryant or usain bolt but black discrimination made me a poor athlete.

Monseur, according to you THE BURDEN OF PROOF SHOULD BE ON THE GUY WHO SAYS ATHLETICISM IS GENETIC, BECAUSE THAT WOULD HURT WHITE PEOPLES FEELINGS.

quite honestly monseur, this is how absurd you sound when you say matter of factly that the concept of intelligence being genetic must carry the burden of proof but the concept of athleticism being genetic doesnt have to carry the burden of proof.

There is absolutely no reason why intelligence potential and athletic potential should follow different rules. Do you monsuer think that natural selection exerts control over one trait (athleticism) and not another(Intelligence)?

if so, you need to prove why this is the case.

You cant just customize biology until it fits with your idealistic notions of human worth. Biology doesnt care about peoples feelings.

Also monseur, you may think you are sounding magnanimous to the audience here because nobody is getting dirty and entering this conversation, but i guaruntee 9 out of 10 of the people reading our posts here know im right, and they know you are a shit-filled jackass who thinks you can convince people that you are credible because of the strong authoritative statements you make like "post a single peer reviewed source” or repeating “the burden of proof is on you” where you try to portray yourself as an authority that should be more trusted with the hammer of science than i should be.

but nobody trusts you, my inferior friend, nobody.

i graduated the #1 school on the planet in 4 yrs and you graduated from your local community college in 8. You have no authority here.

but i dont know why im wasting my time with you because your such fake ass intellectual

-you dont address anything in my posts.

- you dont read any of my sources and you claim they arent valid and you ask for something that very rarely gets published because most journals dont want to be seen espousing the role of genetics in intelligence. You know this, which is why you keep discrediting my sources and saying they arent good enough.

but im the princeton grad here, not you, and having dealt with spending 1000 hrs my sr yr making a publishable thesis in a stem field, i know much better than you what a credible source is, and my sources here are more credible than the sjw fueled (muh beer reviewed) bullshit you post.

The funny thing isnt that people like you got rejected from princeton, its that you got rejected by schools 100 times less competitive than princeton. And you are so angry about getting rejected from everywhere that you had a mental epiphany that helped you get control of your inferiority complex:

you tripped on acid one night while you attended your ghetto comm college and you had a vision where you figured out how to pass yourself off as a true intellectual.

on the surface, you seem credible and trustworthy, but your inability to mention or address any of my statements or direct questions to you is your achilles heel. Youre never going to be able to fool someone like me whose got an iq 30-40 pts higher than u, but you should also know that even the avg person is smart enough to call your fake intellectualism out as complete bullshit.

if i was watching an argument between a princeton grad and a comm college grad, and the comm college grad kept reiterating the same shit as an attempt to get the discussion to take place on his turf/territory/terms, i would think they were an astronomically large asshole, and tbh thats how 9/10 ppl reading this thread view you.

keep hallucinating tho, by all means, professor inferiorboi

 

[skierman]

You keep ignoring what i say in my posts.

the burden of proof should always follow occams razor and assume the most logical hypothesis is correct.

its about 1000 times more logical to assume different people have different intelligence potential just like almost any other trait as opposed to nature giving a single fuck about the feelings of certain humans.

so the burden of proof is clearly on you because your hypothesis is far less reasonable than mine.

by your logic, we should assume that all humans athletic/sports potential is the same.

in fact, im going to sue the NBA for not drafting me to play for a professional basketball team, because my lack of basketball skill is due to oppression by black people who discriminated against me being white and this kept me from becoming a good athlete. I could have been just as athletic as kobe bryant or usain bolt but black discrimination made me a poor athlete.

Monseur, according to you THE BURDEN OF PROOF SHOULD BE ON THE GUY WHO SAYS ATHLETICISM IS GENETIC, BECAUSE THAT WOULD HURT WHITE PEOPLES FEELINGS.

quite honestly monseur, this is how absurd you sound when you say matter of factly that the concept of intelligence being genetic must carry the burden of proof but the concept of athleticism being genetic doesnt have to carry the burden of proof.

There is absolutely no reason why intelligence potential and athletic potential should follow different rules. Do you monsuer think that natural selection exerts control over one trait (athleticism) and not another(Intelligence)?

if so, you need to prove why this is the case.

You cant just customize biology until it fits with your idealistic notions of human worth. Biology doesnt care about peoples feelings.

Also monseur, you may think you are sounding magnanimous to the audience here because nobody is getting dirty and entering this conversation, but i guaruntee 9 out of 10 of the people reading our posts here know im right, and they know you are a shit-filled jackass who thinks you can convince people that you are credible because of the strong authoritative statements you make like "post a single peer reviewed source” or repeating “the burden of proof is on you” where you try to portray yourself as an authority that should be more trusted with the hammer of science than i should be.

but nobody trusts you, my inferior friend, nobody.

i graduated the #1 school on the planet in 4 yrs and you graduated from your local community college in 8. You have no authority here.

but i dont know why im wasting my time with you because your such fake ass intellectual

-you dont address anything in my posts.

- you dont read any of my sources and you claim they arent valid and you ask for something that very rarely gets published because most journals dont want to be seen espousing the role of genetics in intelligence. You know this, which is why you keep discrediting my sources and saying they arent good enough.

but im the princeton grad here, not you, and having dealt with spending 1000 hrs my sr yr making a publishable thesis in a stem field, i know much better than you what a credible source is, and my sources here are more credible than the sjw fueled (muh beer reviewed) bullshit you post.

The funny thing isnt that people like you got rejected from princeton, its that you got rejected by schools 100 times less competitive than princeton. And you are so angry about getting rejected from everywhere that you had a mental epiphany that helped you get control of your inferiority complex:

you tripped on acid one night while you attended your ghetto comm college and you had a vision where you figured out how to pass yourself off as a true intellectual.

on the surface, you seem credible and trustworthy, but your inability to mention or address any of my statements or direct questions to you is your achilles heel. Youre never going to be able to fool someone like me whose got an iq 30-40 pts higher than u, but you should also know that even the avg person is smart enough to call your fake intellectualism out as complete bullshit.

if i was watching an argument between a princeton grad and a comm college grad, and the comm college grad kept reiterating the same shit as an attempt to get the discussion to take place on his turf/territory/terms, i would think they were an astronomically large asshole, and tbh thats how 9/10 ppl reading this thread view you.

keep hallucinating tho, by all means, professor inferiorboi

God damn, you're a waste of time.

 

[dolanslebensraum]

This kind of thinking is just pointless. You come up with a racist idea, you support your racist ideas by linking to racist bloggers. Then flip it around and make everyone else prove you are wrong when no one set out or had attention in doing so. You're like a flat earthers but racist.

Some dude on the street called me a racist years ago and i punched him square in the face.

id love to meet you someday chadboy. I promise you that you will live through it.

but if i were you id start looking for deals on wheelchairs.

dont call me a racist unless youre prepared to unironically drop like fuck-all with me. Im not a racist, and i would literally pay a shitload of money to get to meet you and watch you be so unbelievably fucking stupid to call me a racist to my face.

 

[Monsieur_Patate]

You keep ignoring what i say in my posts.

the burden of proof should always follow occams razor and assume the most logical hypothesis is correct.

its about 1000 times more logical to assume different people have different intelligence potential just like almost any other trait as opposed to nature giving a single fuck about the feelings of certain humans.

so the burden of proof is clearly on you because your hypothesis is far less reasonable than mine.

by your logic, we should assume that all humans athletic/sports potential is the same.

in fact, im going to sue the NBA for not drafting me to play for a professional basketball team, because my lack of basketball skill is due to oppression by black people who discriminated against me being white and this kept me from becoming a good athlete. I could have been just as athletic as kobe bryant or usain bolt but black discrimination made me a poor athlete.

Monseur, according to you THE BURDEN OF PROOF SHOULD BE ON THE GUY WHO SAYS ATHLETICISM IS GENETIC, BECAUSE THAT WOULD HURT WHITE PEOPLES FEELINGS.

quite honestly monseur, this is how absurd you sound when you say matter of factly that the concept of intelligence being genetic must carry the burden of proof but the concept of athleticism being genetic doesnt have to carry the burden of proof.

There is absolutely no reason why intelligence potential and athletic potential should follow different rules. Do you monsuer think that natural selection exerts control over one trait (athleticism) and not another(Intelligence)?

if so, you need to prove why this is the case.

You cant just customize biology until it fits with your idealistic notions of human worth. Biology doesnt care about peoples feelings.

Also monseur, you may think you are sounding magnanimous to the audience here because nobody is getting dirty and entering this conversation, but i guaruntee 9 out of 10 of the people reading our posts here know im right, and they know you are a shit-filled jackass who thinks you can convince people that you are credible because of the strong authoritative statements you make like "post a single peer reviewed source” or repeating “the burden of proof is on you” where you try to portray yourself as an authority that should be more trusted with the hammer of science than i should be.

but nobody trusts you, my inferior friend, nobody.

i graduated the #1 school on the planet in 4 yrs and you graduated from your local community college in 8. You have no authority here.

but i dont know why im wasting my time with you because your such fake ass intellectual

-you dont address anything in my posts.

- you dont read any of my sources and you claim they arent valid and you ask for something that very rarely gets published because most journals dont want to be seen espousing the role of genetics in intelligence. You know this, which is why you keep discrediting my sources and saying they arent good enough.

but im the princeton grad here, not you, and having dealt with spending 1000 hrs my sr yr making a publishable thesis in a stem field, i know much better than you what a credible source is, and my sources here are more credible than the sjw fueled (muh beer reviewed) bullshit you post.

The funny thing isnt that people like you got rejected from princeton, its that you got rejected by schools 100 times less competitive than princeton. And you are so angry about getting rejected from everywhere that you had a mental epiphany that helped you get control of your inferiority complex:

you tripped on acid one night while you attended your ghetto comm college and you had a vision where you figured out how to pass yourself off as a true intellectual.

on the surface, you seem credible and trustworthy, but your inability to mention or address any of my statements or direct questions to you is your achilles heel. Youre never going to be able to fool someone like me whose got an iq 30-40 pts higher than u, but you should also know that even the avg person is smart enough to call your fake intellectualism out as complete bullshit.

if i was watching an argument between a princeton grad and a comm college grad, and the comm college grad kept reiterating the same shit as an attempt to get the discussion to take place on his turf/territory/terms, i would think they were an astronomically large asshole, and tbh thats how 9/10 ppl reading this thread view you.

keep hallucinating tho, by all means, professor inferiorboi

I'll admit I didn't read through all of that, but I get the gist of it, you've switched tactics yet again. Sorry mate, but burden of proof is on the one making a dubious claim, in this case that would be you. I know it upsets you that people won't just believe whatever you say without asking for evidence.

Let's recap again:

- You've made a claim that there is causation between race and intelligence

- Burden of proof is on you

- You failed to provide any data or facts to back up your claim

Lastly not sure what a community college is, being from Europe and all, but I'm sure it was very mean. I'll leave you with a quote from Margaret Thatcher: "if they attack one personally, it means they have not a single political argument left."

 

[dolanslebensraum]

God damn, you're a waste of time.

Meh. You dont have to read my posts if u dont want to. Alot of ppl do though bc my brain is a pretty damn interesting place and its sheer popcorn territory to watch an underdog literally murder his conceited competition even though his competition has systemic conspiratorial support and greater resources/numbers than he does.

but it is fun being the underdog and having people online who like you and put their money on you get hugely rewarded for their trust and comradeship.

its pretty easy to be ron paul and dominate the internet, all you have to do is defend reason and youre 90% of the way there.

i would never tell a soul that there were genetically controlled ethnic iq gaps as long as nobody blamed the lower avg iq scores and lower avg economic status of other ethnicities on white people and white discrimination.

but the left failed.

the left did blame white people for other peoples lower avg iq scores and lower incomes.

like really? Do they think some racist white guy who collects the SAT bubble sheets of black kids erases a bunch of the bubbles and fills in a random one? If that were the case, then yes i would blame the white guy. But i seriously doubt that white people like this erasing bubbles on the sat bubble sheet is the reason for avg iq and sat gaps between ethnicities.

if you take an innocent white kid, and tell them they are guilty and that they are the cause of other races problems, that innocent white kid is clearly within his rights to defend his innocence, and if he defends his innocence by pointing to the real culprit of other races problems/low incomes/iq gap, then he is within his rights to do that, and he will still be innocent.

“Dear left,

dont blame an innocent person for something they didnt do and then tell them they are racist for defending themselves. Because thats how you turn a non racist into a real racist.

thats why you just dont do it. If you want 2 ppl to be friends, you dont tell one of them that the other ones problems are his friends fault. Thats not how you form a friendship; thats how you destroy a friendship.

 

[dolanslebensraum]

I'll admit I didn't read through all of that, but I get the gist of it, you've switched tactics yet again. Sorry mate, but burden of proof is on the one making a dubious claim, in this case that would be you. I know it upsets you that people won't just believe whatever you say without asking for evidence.

Let's recap again:

- You've made a claim that there is causation between race and intelligence

- Burden of proof is on you

- You failed to provide any data or facts to back up your claim

Lastly not sure what a community college is, being from Europe and all, but I'm sure it was very mean. I'll leave you with a quote from Margaret Thatcher: "if they attack one personally, it means they have not a single political argument left."

Dude nobody is on your side here.

Also, im probably way more on the side of BLM than you are and i probably support black americans right to be angry about the police/governments treatment of black people more than you do,

so all things considered most black people would call me much more their friend than they would call your bootlicking ass.

anyways though.

lets recap

-you HAVE NOT explained why the burden of proof is on one side or another. I HAVE.

-you HAVE NOT provided a credible source to justify your position. I HAVE.

- You HAVE NOT addressed a single thing in your opponents posts. I HAVE.

-YOU THINK you are smart enough to control an arguments semantics by sounding authoritatively trustworthy and official in your posts. YOU ARENT.

Your “Muh beer reviewed” strawman is a perfect example of your bullshit. What you are doing is the same as saying “show me a peer reviewed paper that says the number of jews killed in the holocaust is less than believed”

just stop wasting everybodys time monseur.

Nobody here would expect intelligence to be any less genetic than athleticism.

youre basically talking to yourself

 

[snowfinder]

If one or more people have called you a racist that would be called sufficient evidence that you are one. If what you say is true and your reaction was a physical one instead of a mental one that is evidence you're not that intelligent. Someone with higher intelligence could use their words to dismiss being labeled a racist with a discussion.

Some dude on the street called me a racist years ago and i punched him square in the face.

id love to meet you someday chadboy. I promise you that you will live through it.

but if i were you id start looking for deals on wheelchairs.

dont call me a racist unless youre prepared to unironically drop like fuck-all with me. Im not a racist, and i would literally pay a shitload of money to get to meet you and watch you be so unbelievably fucking stupid to call me a racist to my face.

 

[Stainr]

If one or more people have called you a racist that would be called sufficient evidence that you are one. If what you say is true and your reaction was a physical one instead of a mental one that is evidence you're not that intelligent. Someone with higher intelligence could use their words to dismiss being labeled a racist with a discussion.

Trumps been called a racist what... 1 millions + times... and hes not racist so...

ur point is invalid... again.

 

[snowfinder]

Trump is a racist how does that fact make my point invalid?

Trumps been called a racist what... 1 millions + times... and hes not racist so...

ur point is invalid... again.

 

[Stainr]

Trump is a racist how does that fact make my point invalid?

lol, do you have any facts behind this? You prolly think Biden isn't a racist... right?

 

[snowfinder]

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2020/07/07/time-racial-euphanisms-is-over/
https://www.cnn.com/2020/07/14/politics/donald-trump-police-brutality/index.html
https://theintercept.com/2020/06/24/trump-made-racist-joke-phoenix-megachurch-crowd-went-wild/

This is just from the last month or so. There's alot more so much more its overwhelming how much evidence there is of him being a racist. But you would be one of the people like in the he video at his rally and laughed at the racist joke.

lol, do you have any facts behind this? You prolly think Biden isn't a racist... right?

**This post was edited on Jul 20th 2020 at 8:56:38am

 

[Stainr]

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2020/07/07/time-racial-euphanisms-is-over/
https://www.cnn.com/2020/07/14/politics/donald-trump-police-brutality/index.html
https://theintercept.com/2020/06/24/trump-made-racist-joke-phoenix-megachurch-crowd-went-wild/

This is just from the last month or so. There's alot more so much more its overwhelming how much evidence there is of him being a racist. But you would be one of the people like in the he video at his rally and laughed at the racist joke.

**This post was edited on Jul 20th 2020 at 8:56:38am

You people would take a JoKe seriously...

 

[snowfinder]

I gave you evidence and sources and you attack me with no rebuttal.

You people would take a JoKe seriously...

 

[skierman]

Meh. You dont have to read my posts if u dont want to. [/b]

This is how far I make it in any of your posts. You're a bigger waste of time than trying to jack off to Hillary Clinton.

 

[Lonely]

Princetons per capita endowment is almost 2 times the size of 2nd place harvard.

Dolan has been part of the liberal elite this whole time :'(

 

[Monsieur_Patate]

Dude nobody is on your side here.

Also, im probably way more on the side of BLM than you are and i probably support black americans right to be angry about the police/governments treatment of black people more than you do,

so all things considered most black people would call me much more their friend than they would call your bootlicking ass.

anyways though.

lets recap

-you HAVE NOT explained why the burden of proof is on one side or another. I HAVE.

-you HAVE NOT provided a credible source to justify your position. I HAVE.

- You HAVE NOT addressed a single thing in your opponents posts. I HAVE.

-YOU THINK you are smart enough to control an arguments semantics by sounding authoritatively trustworthy and official in your posts. YOU ARENT.

Your “Muh beer reviewed” strawman is a perfect example of your bullshit. What you are doing is the same as saying “show me a peer reviewed paper that says the number of jews killed in the holocaust is less than believed”

just stop wasting everybodys time monseur.

Nobody here would expect intelligence to be any less genetic than athleticism.

youre basically talking to yourself

A brief history of your contributions to this argument as I feel we're going in circles and our discussion has run its course:

1. Presented a controversial and unproven claim as fact - Is promptly asked to provide evidence to support claim

2. Tried deflecting, changing topics to reorient the discussion - not working, is still asked to provide evidence in support of original claim

3. Tried putting words into other party's mouth - not working, other party won't bite, is still asked to provide evidence in support of original claim

4. Tried presenting an opinion blog post with no relevant data as evidence - not working, is still asked to provide relevant evidence in support of original claim

5. Tried discrediting the need for data from peer reviewed studies in favor of unsupported opinions - not working, is still asked to provide evidence in support of original claim

6. Tried switching the burden of proof to the other party because unable to come up with any evidence - not working, is still asked to provide evidence in support of original claim

7. Tried ad hominem attacks, belittle other party - not working, other party won't engage, is still asked to provide evidence in support of original claim

8. "1000 people a day are switching to my opinion" "nobody is on your side", tried making up outside support (LMAO at the 1000 people a day stat btw, way to discredit yourself even further) as realization that the claim has no merit on its own sits in - not working, is still asked to provide evidence in support of original claim

I feel like I'm arguing with a 6 year old tbh, this is textbook everything you shouldn't do in an argument if you want to be taken seriously.

The simple fact is that there is no data currently available to back up your claim and prove causation, that's just a fact.

What you have is an opinion, an unproven theory at best. We all have opinions, that's fine, but don't expect other people to blindly agree with your theories (as biased and racist as they might be) if you're not able to show some data to back it up.

If you're genuinely interested in the topic and not just trolling about, I suggest you look into the Flynn and Pygmalion effects, it might help change your perspective.

 

[little1337]

Some dude on the street called me a racist years ago and i punched him square in the face.

id love to meet you someday chadboy. I promise you that you will live through it.

but if i were you id start looking for deals on wheelchairs.

I'm not sure how I'm typing this as I am paralyzed in fear

 

[dolanslebensraum]

This is how far I make it in any of your posts. You're a bigger waste of time than trying to jack off to Hillary Clinton.

you tried jacking off to hillary clinton?

lol u creep

**This post was edited on Jul 20th 2020 at 12:08:43pm

 

[dolanslebensraum]

A brief history of your contributions to this argument as I feel we're going in circles and our discussion has run its course:

1. Presented a controversial and unproven claim as fact - Is promptly asked to provide evidence to support claim

2. Tried deflecting, changing topics to reorient the discussion - not working, is still asked to provide evidence in support of original claim

3. Tried putting words into other party's mouth - not working, other party won't bite, is still asked to provide evidence in support of original claim

4. Tried presenting an opinion blog post with no relevant data as evidence - not working, is still asked to provide relevant evidence in support of original claim

5. Tried discrediting the need for data from peer reviewed studies in favor of unsupported opinions - not working, is still asked to provide evidence in support of original claim

6. Tried switching the burden of proof to the other party because unable to come up with any evidence - not working, is still asked to provide evidence in support of original claim

7. Tried ad hominem attacks, belittle other party - not working, other party won't engage, is still asked to provide evidence in support of original claim

8. "1000 people a day are switching to my opinion" "nobody is on your side", tried making up outside support (LMAO at the 1000 people a day stat btw, way to discredit yourself even further) as realization that the claim has no merit on its own sits in - not working, is still asked to provide evidence in support of original claim

I feel like I'm arguing with a 6 year old tbh, this is textbook everything you shouldn't do in an argument if you want to be taken seriously.

The simple fact is that there is no data currently available to back up your claim and prove causation, that's just a fact.

What you have is an opinion, an unproven theory at best. We all have opinions, that's fine, but don't expect other people to blindly agree with your theories (as biased and racist as they might be) if you're not able to show some data to back it up.

If you're genuinely interested in the topic and not just trolling about, I suggest you look into the Flynn and Pygmalion effects, it might help change your perspective.

Keep talking to yourself inferiorboy.

im not reading your nonsense anymore because you didnt address any of my perfectly valid statements and direct questions to you.

You think you can dress up a post in a very organized and sophisticated format and use very concise points in order to appear credible and authoritative.

but 9/10 ppl here are on my side so ur wasting ur time.

you make statements like “the burden of proof is on you” without providing a single shred of evidence for why in the fucking solar system that should be the case.

people like you are what turn non racists into racists.

good job monseur at turning everybody against you with your self righteous pomposity. You should be proud

**This post was edited on Jul 20th 2020 at 12:23:32pm

 

[TheHamburglar]

Imagine being such a loser that you post for days in this thread about nothing at all

 

[Monsieur_Patate]

Keep talking to yourself inferiorboy.

im not reading your nonsense anymore because you didnt address any of my perfectly valid statements and direct questions to you.

You think you can dress up a post in a very organized and sophisticated format and use very concise points in order to appear credible and authoritative.

but 9/10 ppl here are on my side so ur wasting ur time.

you make statements like “the burden of proof is on you” without providing a single shred of evidence for why in the fucking solar system that should be the case.

people like you are what turn non racists into racists.

good job monseur at turning everybody against you with your self righteous pomposity. You should be proud

**This post was edited on Jul 20th 2020 at 12:23:32pm

I love how you come up with those nice statistics "9/10 ppl here are on my side", great stat, please name 9 people in this thread on your side, genuinely curious.

Let's recap:

- You made a claim that there is causation between race and intelligence

- Burden of proof is on you

- You failed to provide any data or facts to back up your claim

 

[dolanslebensraum]

I love how you come up with those nice statistics "9/10 ppl here are on my side", great stat, please name 9 people in this thread on your side, genuinely curious.

Let's recap:

- You made a claim that there is causation between race and intelligence

- Burden of proof is on you

- You failed to provide any data or facts to back up your claim

No. Nice try tho.

youre making a claim that intelligence potential is not controlled by genetics.

That is a wild claim, seeing as there is absolutely no reason to assume intelligence is any less controlled by genes than height or athletic ability.

keep assuming tho.

youre like a walking talking assumption.

youre like the energizer bunny, except instead of beat a drum you make assumptions.

Do you even assume brah?



**This post was edited on Jul 21st 2020 at 12:24:18pm

 

[Monsieur_Patate]

No. Nice try tho.

youre making a claim that intelligence potential is not controlled by genetics.

That is a wild claim, seeing as there is absolutely no reason to assume intelligence is any less controlled by genes than height or athletic ability.

keep assuming tho.

youre like a walking talking assumption.

youre like the energizer bunny, except instead of beat a drum you make assumptions.

Do you even assume brah?

View attachment 968505

**This post was edited on Jul 21st 2020 at 12:24:18pm

You're confused about your own argument it seems. Your claim is not that intelligence potential is controlled by genetics, that's very broad, your claim is much narrower: that there are race-specific genes impacting intelligence potential.

Then I never made such a claim, I challenge you to find a quote of me saying that "intelligence potential is not controlled by genetics".

My only claim is that "There is no scientific evidence that the average IQ scores of different racial or ethnic population groups can be attributed to any claimed genetic differences between those groups".

Contrary to you, I understand the difference between correlation and causation, and between a theory and a fact. From the beginning, I'm just pointing out that your opinion is nothing more than a theory due to the lack of definitive data either confirming or disconfirm it. In other words, you have no proof, so stop presenting biased opinions as facts.

Again, I feel like I'm arguing with a 6 years old who doesn't really understand the words he is using.

 

[dolanslebensraum]

You're confused about your own argument it seems. Your claim is not that intelligence potential is controlled by genetics, that's very broad, your claim is much narrower: that there are race-specific genes impacting intelligence potential.

Then I never made such a claim, I challenge you to find a quote of me saying that "intelligence potential is not controlled by genetics".

My only claim is that "There is no scientific evidence that the average IQ scores of different racial or ethnic population groups can be attributed to any claimed genetic differences between those groups".

Contrary to you, I understand the difference between correlation and causation, and between a theory and a fact. From the beginning, I'm just pointing out that your opinion is nothing more than a theory due to the lack of definitive data either confirming or disconfirm it. In other words, you have no proof, so stop presenting biased opinions as facts.

Again, I feel like I'm arguing with a 6 years old who doesn't really understand the words he is using.

Im done reading your bullshit monseur.

if you want to make a claim that intelligence is not genetic like height and athleticism are you have to prove it with peer reviewed sources.

If not then go fuck your father. Hes got rectal itch and wants you to lube up with icy hot.

**This post was edited on Jul 21st 2020 at 7:12:52pm

 

[little1337]

Im done reading your bullshit monseur.

if you want to make a claim that intelligence not genetic like height and athleticism are you have to prove it with peer reviewed sources.

If not then go fuck your father. Hes got rectal itch and wants you to lube up with icy hot.

lmao still no proof of ur claims tho...

 

[ChadThundercock]

who gives a fuck? trump 2020

 

[Monsieur_Patate]

Im done reading your bullshit monseur.

if you want to make a claim that intelligence is not genetic like height and athleticism are you have to prove it with peer reviewed sources.

If not then go fuck your father. Hes got rectal itch and wants you to lube up with icy hot.

**This post was edited on Jul 21st 2020 at 7:12:52pm

Sadly for you insults are not evidence, you're still coming short

 

[qazwsxedc34]

h

**This post was edited on Aug 27th 2020 at 6:30:22pm

 

[qazwsxedc34]

You just described 95% of politicians.

SO, philanthropists?

 

[MiIfHunter]

So I need to buy a book from some cunt to find out this information. This slut is probably just salty bcuz she never got any trump money so see needs to make money selling shit books

 

[chef_boyardee]

So I need to buy a book from some cunt to find out this information. This slut is probably just salty bcuz she never got any trump money so see needs to make money selling shit books

I mean yeah, I don't need to read a book to learn that trump is a delusional narcissist. But referring to women as cunts and sluts makes you seem like an angry incel.

 

[vibecheck]

I mean yeah, I don't need to read a book to learn that trump is a delusional narcissist. But referring to women as cunts and sluts makes you seem like an angry incel.

 

[Casey]