Mary Trump tell-all paints president as a ‘narcissist’ who is ‘lost to his own delusional spin

BuT mEdIa dIdNt CoVeR iT nEvEr HaPpEnEd.

So many people are clueless.

Funny how they support terrorist groups tho.

14157286:SuspiciousFish said:
Because Nick Cannon totally didnt just to on a tirade calling White people sub human. Lol and the media finally fired him for crossing the line and saying bad things about Jews.

Or how about those teens literally executed in CHAZ Seattle?

Or the 8 yr old girl murdered in Atlanta because her Mom took a wrong turn and went through their 'CHAZ' Zone?

Or the 24 yr old Indiana Mom who was murdered by BLM for saying "All Lives Matter"?

Or the Black guy in Seattle facing felony charges and a 1.25 MILLION dollar bail for swerving around a BLM baricade and hitting 2 idiot girls dancing on a freeway.

How many people did the KKK or so called neo-nazis kill in 2020?
 
14157291:Stainr said:
BuT mEdIa dIdNt CoVeR iT nEvEr HaPpEnEd.

So many people are clueless.

Funny how they support terrorist groups tho.

they did cover it. right wing media tends to report things that everyone is reporting, they like to say no one is reporting it but them. if you look outside your small news source you will see this.
 
14157271:Charlie_Kelly said:
“Racism is evil and those who cause violence in its name are criminals and thugs, including the KKK, neo-Nazis, white supremacists, and other hate groups,”

Aw you mean Trump's apology after calling neo-Nazis and racists "good people"?

The apology he delivered with no sincerity and afterwards said he would never apologize again?

Such condemnation. Much brave
 
14157297:skierman said:
Aw you mean Trump's apology after calling neo-Nazis and racists "good people"?

The apology he delivered with no sincerity and afterwards said he would never apologize again?

Such condemnation. Much brave

how about his love for the confederate history, why would a new yorker care so much for the confederate? hmm one can wonder.
 
14157301:snowfinder said:
how about his love for the confederate history, why would a new yorker care so much for the confederate? hmm one can wonder.

Maybe because papa was in the KKK. I GUESS ITS ALL A BIG COINCIDENCE
 
14157301:snowfinder said:
how about his love for the confederate history, why would a new yorker care so much for the confederate? hmm one can wonder.

One could jump to conclusions and make assumptions for sure.

What a time to be alive, you can basically get called a racist for anything nowadays. Crazy that the majority of the nation will be voting for either a narcissist or a pedophile in November.
 
14157303:Charlie_Kelly said:
One could jump to conclusions and make assumptions for sure.

What a time to be alive, you can basically get called a racist for anything nowadays. Crazy that the majority of the nation will be voting for either a narcissist or a pedophile in November.

Trump is a narcissist pedophile. He bragged about walking through miss teen beauty pageants and seeing all the naked young girls. He told an 11 year old he would date her, he hit on his daughter... often. How dont you know this? We are all aware Biden is a creepy dude that's known and people dont deny it. But for some reason trump supporters wont accept what trump has said and done.

968267.jpeg
 
14157306:snowfinder said:
Trump is a narcissist pedophile. He bragged about walking through miss teen beauty pageants and seeing all the naked young girls. He told an 11 year old he would date her, he hit on his daughter... often. How dont you know this? We are all aware Biden is a creepy dude that's known and people dont deny it. But for some reason trump supporters wont accept what trump has said and done.

View attachment 968267

Biden isn’t just “creepy”. He has countless sexual misconduct claims against him, same as Trump. But to correct myself it’s a choice between 2 pedofiles, unless people decide to stop always voting democrat or republican like they are the only choices.

Also not a Trump supporter FYI. Never have nor will vote for him or creepy Joe.

**This post was edited on Jul 16th 2020 at 11:36:35am

**This post was edited on Jul 16th 2020 at 11:37:14am
 
14157288:snowfinder said:

1. I watched the full video on this. Yeah they guys were drunk idiot rednecks but they never tried lynching the guy or his friends. It looks like they were trespassing and refused to leave and tried starting shit to get a reaction to film. Vauhxx was recently kicked out of BLM before this incident by the way, sounds like a good way to get some cred back.

2. He killed himself? The even had card record of him buying rope.

3. George Floyd was on drugs and was killed because some cop that knew him personally and hated him kneeled on his neck. He is in jail right now and no White people are supporting the POS cop.

4. Zero evidence she was killed by any White Supremacist group.

5. Again, zero evidence she was killed by any White Supremacist group.

6. Still no evidence any White Supremecist group did this.
 
14157321:SuspiciousFish said:
1. I watched the full video on this. Yeah they guys were drunk idiot rednecks but they never tried lynching the guy or his friends. It looks like they were trespassing and refused to leave and tried starting shit to get a reaction to film. Vauhxx was recently kicked out of BLM before this incident by the way, sounds like a good way to get some cred back.

2. He killed himself? The even had card record of him buying rope.

3. George Floyd was on drugs and was killed because some cop that knew him personally and hated him kneeled on his neck. He is in jail right now and no White people are supporting the POS cop.

4. Zero evidence she was killed by any White Supremacist group.

5. Again, zero evidence she was killed by any White Supremacist group.

6. Still no evidence any White Supremecist group did this.
https://www.usnews.com/news/top-new...dicted-with-murder-of-black-jogger-in-georgia
 
14157053:Charlie_Kelly said:
What has Trump done to indicate he is a racist?

This.

just because you believe politically Incorrect things does not make you a racist.

and if you think it does, then you are literally saying racism is ok.

because being politically incorrect is really something that does not have to be malevolent.

just because you think Genetically based intelligence plays a role in how much money different ethnicities make does not make you a racist.

if you have half a brain you will understand what a selection pressure is, and you wont be able to lie to yourself about things like the huge differences between the history of europe and the history of subsaharan africa

and for the people who know themselves that genetics plays a role but they lie to everybody they talk to by saying genetics plays no role and all brains are created equal and anybody who says otherwise is a racist, i view these people as complete fucking scumbags.

like i seriously consider those types of people worse than racists. They think they are so much smarter than you that they can get you to believe that they believe something they dont believe in their mind. Absolute degenerates

**This post was edited on Jul 17th 2020 at 1:54:08am
 
14157216:Pachankz said:
your whataboutism is showing and it's not a good look.

"there's a lot of people who like how trump is honest and politically incorrect and they're not all idiots."
https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...e-18000-false-or-misleading-claims-1170-days/

Honest? no, he's beyond a proven pathological liar. A sociopath , like Trump has antisocial personality disorder. The diagnostic criteria for diagnosing a sociopath has a feature specifically about lying. Criteria feature number 2.

(2) deceitfulness, as indicated by repeated lying, use of aliases, or conning others for personal profit or pleasure.

As proven in above lie counter link, and that was from April.

"a lot of people have been educated by trump about things no other president has or would have verbalized the way trump has."

Verbalized ? like this


"trump had the balls to finally say fuck china, and people not only love him for doing things like that but they should love him for doing things like that."

you sure about that?


"Just bc the prez isnt a good role model doesnt mean you should literally hate/despise every fucking thing about him."

it's not your fault you aren't educated in malignant narcissism, and sociopathy, but you can always learn, and I can more than gaurantee, if you truly educated yourself on these conditions, like thoroughly educated yourself , you're entire perspective of trump would flip, it would be a complete and total impossibility to like one of these evil monsters.

Here's a few channels to get started on your deprogramming.
https://www.youtube.com/user/samvaknin
https://www.youtube.com/user/DoctorRamanDurvasula

I wont argue that trump has major flaws, but the market and unemployment rate show that he might have been doing something right, and i dont think ur willing to give trump credit where he deserves it. Yeah trumps an asshole, but the stock market that soared under trump was not because of fucking obama.
 
14157306:snowfinder said:
Trump is a narcissist pedophile. He bragged about walking through miss teen beauty pageants and seeing all the naked young girls. He told an 11 year old he would date her, he hit on his daughter... often. How dont you know this? We are all aware Biden is a creepy dude that's known and people dont deny it. But for some reason trump supporters wont accept what trump has said and done.

View attachment 968267

Dude shut the fuck up.
 
14157440:DolanReloaded said:
I wont argue that trump has major flaws, but the market and unemployment rate show that he might have been doing something right, and i dont think ur willing to give trump credit where he deserves it. Yeah trumps an asshole, but the stock market that soared under trump was not because of fucking obama.

The stock market isn't the fucking economy. God damn.

Why do people think it is? No economist uses "stock market returns" as an indication of whether or not the country is doing well. It doesn't take a lot of things into consideration.

Want a current example? Look at the stock market right now and then look at the following: unemployment, crude oil prices, consumer confidence, durable goods orders, federal interest rate, industrial production index, and 10-yr bond yield . There's been a huge divergence between the S&P and those. If the economy was doing "well", then those would be up/down in the case of unemployment.

So Trump's "stock market returns" may be great (again, looking at a 10 year graph stocks are just continuing their prior trends until COVID) but PLEASE stop using them as a fucking metric to measure economic growth and success.

**This post was edited on Jul 17th 2020 at 7:03:50am
 
14157440:DolanReloaded said:
I wont argue that trump has major flaws, but the market and unemployment rate show that he might have been doing something right, and i dont think ur willing to give trump credit where he deserves it. Yeah trumps an asshole, but the stock market that soared under trump was not because of fucking obama.

"He might be a psychopath conman that hangs out with pedophiles and rapes women including his daughter, he might be eroding away the foundations of our country trying to turn it into a Banana republic while killing all environment regulations BUT the stock market is doing well so I'm voting for him!"

duuuuuuuuuurrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
 
14157438:DolanReloaded said:
This.

just because you believe politically Incorrect things does not make you a racist.

and if you think it does, then you are literally saying racism is ok.

because being politically incorrect is really something that does not have to be malevolent.

just because you think Genetically based intelligence plays a role in how much money different ethnicities make does not make you a racist.

if you have half a brain you will understand what a selection pressure is, and you wont be able to lie to yourself about things like the huge differences between the history of europe and the history of subsaharan africa

and for the people who know themselves that genetics plays a role but they lie to everybody they talk to by saying genetics plays no role and all brains are created equal and anybody who says otherwise is a racist, i view these people as complete fucking scumbags.

like i seriously consider those types of people worse than racists. They think they are so much smarter than you that they can get you to believe that they believe something they dont believe in their mind. Absolute degenerates

**This post was edited on Jul 17th 2020 at 1:54:08am

Dolan: "I'm not racist but black people are dumber than white people because they're black (because "Genetics", but I won't provide any data because there actually isn't any backing up my racist claim). It's politically incorrect, but hey that doesn't make me racist guys!" .

Sorry bud, but it most definitely makes you racist. Keep lying to yourself if it makes you feel better tho, you racist asshole.

There is no scientific evidence that the average IQ scores of different racial or ethnic population groups can be attributed to any claimed genetic differences between those groups, and that's on facts.
 
Obviously he got his facts from DiCaprio's speech from Django Unchained.

14157489:Monsieur_Patate said:
Dolan: "I'm not racist but black people are dumber than white people because they're black (because "Genetics", but I won't provide any data because there actually isn't any backing up my racist claim). It's politically incorrect, but hey that doesn't make me racist guys!" .

Sorry bud, but it most definitely makes you racist. Keep lying to yourself if it makes you feel better tho, you racist asshole.

There is no scientific evidence that the average IQ scores of different racial or ethnic population groups can be attributed to any claimed genetic differences between those groups, and that's on facts.
 
14157438:DolanReloaded said:
This.

just because you believe politically Incorrect things does not make you a racist.

and if you think it does, then you are literally saying racism is ok.

because being politically incorrect is really something that does not have to be malevolent.

just because you think Genetically based intelligence plays a role in how much money different ethnicities make does not make you a racist.

if you have half a brain you will understand what a selection pressure is, and you wont be able to lie to yourself about things like the huge differences between the history of europe and the history of subsaharan africa

and for the people who know themselves that genetics plays a role but they lie to everybody they talk to by saying genetics plays no role and all brains are created equal and anybody who says otherwise is a racist, i view these people as complete fucking scumbags.

like i seriously consider those types of people worse than racists. They think they are so much smarter than you that they can get you to believe that they believe something they dont believe in their mind. Absolute degenerates

**This post was edited on Jul 17th 2020 at 1:54:08am

That same genetics logic was used to justify the holocaust, whether it was true or not. Very slippery slope you're on there.
 
14157459:snowfinder said:
Snowflake cant handle hearing his beloved trump is a pedo.

Get a fucking life clownboy.

14157471:skierman said:
"He might be a psychopath conman that hangs out with pedophiles and rapes women including his daughter, he might be eroding away the foundations of our country trying to turn it into a Banana republic while killing all environment regulations BUT the stock market is doing well so I'm voting for him!"

duuuuuuuuuurrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr

Dont forget that trump invented cancer.

14157493:snowfinder said:
Obviously he got his facts from DiCaprio's speech from Django Unchained.

You wish.

14157498:r00kie said:
That same genetics logic was used to justify the holocaust, whether it was true or not. Very slippery slope you're on there.

Blaming white people for the Fact there are the same ethnically oriented wealth disparities in pretty much every country on the planet is just as bad as anything a racist might do or say.

if you are going to promote white guilt and say white racism is the reason for iq differences then prepare yourself to hear a fucking baller defense against this complete horseshit idealistic notion.

you want a source? Heres a good starting point from someone who denounces racism and says that if you judge a persons intelligence based on their race alone then you are probably dumber than they are.
https://rense.com/general79/dut.htm

“It's time to prepare for the possibility that equality of intelligence, in the sense of racial averages on tests, will turn out not to be true. ”
 
14157489:Monsieur_Patate said:
Dolan: "I'm not racist but black people are dumber than white people because they're black (because "Genetics", but I won't provide any data because there actually isn't any backing up my racist claim). It's politically incorrect, but hey that doesn't make me racist guys!" .

Sorry bud, but it most definitely makes you racist. Keep lying to yourself if it makes you feel better tho, you racist asshole.

There is no scientific evidence that the average IQ scores of different racial or ethnic population groups can be attributed to any claimed genetic differences between those groups, and that's on facts.

White people are just as innocent as any other race or ethnicity. Nobody buys ur idea that whites are to blame for everything. We are innocent, and we arent racist.

height — heritable

eye color— heritable

hair color—heritable

athleticism— heritable

fetishes— heritable

bone structure— heritable

set point weight— heritable

many mental conditions and traits—heritable

iq— heritable

intelligence— NOT HERITABLE

why is it ok to conclude that everything is heritable except this one little thing: intelligence?

Why do idiots try to defend the notion that all men are created equal, even though all evidence points that general intelligence as a trait is just as much heritable or more than height?

the part that bothers me is that you monseur patate completely agree with me that intelligence is heritable, and yet you think you are smart enough to fool people like me into thinking you monseur actually believe the idealistic shill bullshit that you say you believe.

its a total hypocritical asshole move to believe one thing but say to others that you believe the exact opposite.

you know there were different selection pressures between european civilization and sub saharan african tribes that gave differential boosts to genetic fitness depending on intelligence increasing mutations/adaptations.

We both know that underneath your “blame white ppl” facade you completely agree with me and you know white people are innocent.

but you still play this childish game of saying one thing but knowing its a lie and your a fucking asshole for doing it.

around the time europeans were building bridges and cathedrals and horse carriages subsaharan africans were as of yet to invent the wheel or the bow and arrow.

Now go cry to the mods and beg them to delete my posts bc you think its Hatespeech you little rat snitch loser. Youre a fucking dishonest asshole.
 
14157669:DolanReloaded said:
White people are just as innocent as any other race or ethnicity. Nobody buys ur idea that whites are to blame for everything. We are innocent, and we arent racist.

height — heritable

eye color— heritable

hair color—heritable

athleticism— heritable

fetishes— heritable

bone structure— heritable

set point weight— heritable

many mental conditions and traits—heritable

iq— heritable

intelligence— NOT HERITABLE

why is it ok to conclude that everything is heritable except this one little thing: intelligence?

Why do idiots try to defend the notion that all men are created equal, even though all evidence points that general intelligence as a trait is just as much heritable or more than height?

the part that bothers me is that you monseur patate completely agree with me that intelligence is heritable, and yet you think you are smart enough to fool people like me into thinking you monseur actually believe the idealistic shill bullshit that you say you believe.

its a total hypocritical asshole move to believe one thing but say to others that you believe the exact opposite.

you know there were different selection pressures between european civilization and sub saharan african tribes that gave differential boosts to genetic fitness depending on intelligence increasing mutations/adaptations.

We both know that underneath your “blame white ppl” facade you completely agree with me and you know white people are innocent.

but you still play this childish game of saying one thing but knowing its a lie and your a fucking asshole for doing it.

around the time europeans were building bridges and cathedrals and horse carriages subsaharan africans were as of yet to invent the wheel or the bow and arrow.

Now go cry to the mods and beg them to delete my posts bc you think its Hatespeech you little rat snitch loser. Youre a fucking dishonest asshole.

Stop deflecting and digressing because you're losing the argument, stay on topic.

I'm keeping this very simple so you can follow: There is no scientific evidence that the average IQ scores of different racial or ethnic population groups can be attributed to any claimed genetic differences between those groups.

You're claiming otherwise: prove it.
 
14157673:Monsieur_Patate said:
Stop deflecting and digressing because you're losing the argument, stay on topic.

I'm keeping this very simple so you can follow: There is no scientific evidence that the average IQ scores of different racial or ethnic population groups can be attributed to any claimed genetic differences between those groups.

You're claiming otherwise: prove it.

just wait until his blackout 1 AM response. I'm sure it will be filled with rational thought and devoid of racism.
 
14157673:Monsieur_Patate said:
Stop deflecting and digressing because you're losing the argument, stay on topic.

I'm keeping this very simple so you can follow: There is no scientific evidence that the average IQ scores of different racial or ethnic population groups can be attributed to any claimed genetic differences between those groups.

You're claiming otherwise: prove it.

Dude you are still being a fucking shiteater.

stop avoiding the issue: you know for a fact that in a tribe where hunting with wood spears and gathering and building huts out of clay is the staple, a random mutation that made one of the offspring have the potential to be a great architect will not reward that offspring with genetic fitness and higher than avg rate of procreation like the same situation would in colder, more social europe.

dont pretend youre not smart enough to understand what a selection pressure is.

And for repeatedly lying to me, go chokefuck your father you fucking joke

Im gonna put it straight for you son.

You need to understand your not going to be able to fool everybody with your feigned ignorance. Some people are too much smarter than you for you to be able to troll them.

I estimate theres a high probability that im one of those people.

the only option you have to fool people like me is pretend you are really stupid so i have the inclination that maybe you are too stupid to call out the idealistic equality bullshit.

but you blew it, because you didnt act stupid. You acted really smart and organized to appear as smart as possible. So obviously thats a dead giveaway to people like me that you are too smart (although you really dont have to be that smart) to believe the equality argument youre shilling.

so again, im going to tell you: fuck you for lying to me about what you really believe.

**This post was edited on Jul 18th 2020 at 1:28:36am
 
14157689:DolanReloaded said:
Dude you are still being a fucking shiteater.

stop avoiding the issue: you know for a fact that in a tribe where hunting with wood spears and gathering and building huts out of clay is the staple, a random mutation that made one of the offspring have the potential to be a great architect will not reward that offspring with genetic fitness and higher than avg rate of procreation like the same situation would in colder, more social europe.

dont pretend youre not smart enough to understand what a selection pressure is.

And for repeatedly lying to me, go chokefuck your father you fucking joke

**This post was edited on Jul 18th 2020 at 1:13:59am

And here we are, digressing again to try and save face while hiding the fact that you have zero data to back up your racist rhetoric.
 
14157698:Monsieur_Patate said:
And here we are, digressing again to try and save face while hiding the fact that you have zero data to back up your racist rhetoric.
https://rense.com/general79/dut.htm

the truth has a ring to it that will will not always be gentle with peoples feelings. In 10 years of the going rate of free speech online you monseur are not going to be able to convince anyone of your bullshit shill attempt.
 
14157700:DolanReloaded said:
https://rense.com/general79/dut.htm

the truth has a ring to it that will will not always be gentle with peoples feelings. In 10 years of the going rate of free speech online you monseur are not going to be able to convince anyone of your bullshit shill attempt.

This is not a study, it's a blog post without any actual data.

I don't doubt that there are plenty of those bigot takes online, you're certainly not the only racist on the internet. But this is not what I asked for. I asked for some data, as in a peer reviewed academic study showing causation (correlation doesn't mean shit).

Keep trying.
 
14157702:Monsieur_Patate said:
This is not a study, it's a blog post without any actual data.

I don't doubt that there are plenty of those bigot takes online, you're certainly not the only racist on the internet. But this is not what I asked for. I asked for some data, as in a peer reviewed academic study showing causation (correlation doesn't mean shit).

Keep trying.

Fuck you dude. The rense article has tons of data. Why dont you actually read it instead of pretending you did.

Nobody believes you elitest cocksuckers. For a while you social justice whores were trying to say that race didnt exist. Look what happened to that argument. It fizzled out because no matter how prestigious the professors were who invented the “race doesnt exist” notion, the internet is a fair playing field and appeals to authority cant win if the argument in question is fallacious and ridiculous.

i get that you think posturing as if you speak from authority and saying things matter of factly like “there is no evidence of genetic intelligence traits”

and trying to dump the burden of proof in my backyard makes your argument appear genuine, but this is the internet. This is not a courtroom, and you are not a good looking charismatic lawyer. If you want to win an argument on the internet you have to be defending the truth.

but you are not defending the truth. You are defending peoples feelings.

Why dont you answer the following question.

“do you think the selection pressure towards higher intelligence in europe was equally as strong in subsaharan hunter gatherer tribes?”

if you dont answer this question you basically prove my argument.

from an occamesque point of view, it makes no sense to think that evolution led to all human brains having equal potential to achieve the same adult intelligence. That is very far fetched and unreasonable. Why would everything be equal? Who controls the dna that grows humans brains so that all brains are equal?

my dad was Always strong in math/science and was valedictorian of his med school without trying overly hard. I slept through every math science class in high school and still getting about a 99-100% avg on my way to attending the #1 uni on earth.

i could have taught AP physics when i was 12 years old it was that much of a joke to me.

answer me this: why did i have such an easy time in math and science like my dad did? If all brains were created equal, then why was everybody else in my class sweating bullets trying to learn stuff that was simply natural to me?

if math science potential is all nurture like you seem to contend, then isnt it truly a coincidence that my dad and i both developed into 1/1000 rarity math science whiz kids? The probability of that happening by chance is 1 in a million. So basically you are full of shit.

The burden of proof is on you. Why in the holy trinity of clownfuck would everybodys iq potential be the same? Thats like doing 100 random turns on a rubiks cube and happening to end up with a perfectly solved cube. Probability is not on your side

the much more reasonable argument is the one with fewest Assumptions. The idea that “all intelligences are born equal” is a very big assumption and it is not justified by anything other than wishing for the world to be delicate with peoples feelings. The idea that “intelligence potential or iq is genetically influenced and varies from person to person” is a much much smaller assumption to make at the start.

The truth is there is absolutely no evidence that intelligence potential Is the same in all humans.

According to you, what is the reason you think “all intelligence potentials are the same at birth” is a reasonable or justified assumption to make?

why?

why? Because the alternative hurts alot of peoples feelings?

Why on earth would someone possibly think that it would be reasonable to assume everything is created equal? Because lincoln said it and everything he said must be true?

i already posted a link filled with authentic information/data on racial iq studies that proves my point of view.

now lets see you prove that a hunter gatherer tribe would reward a child of naturally higher aptitude with genetic fitness and increased procreation at the same level as the same child would be rewarded in a sophisticated european society.

if you dont address this question then accept your loss of the argument and shut the fuck up.

**This post was edited on Jul 18th 2020 at 7:29:27am
 
14157711:DolanReloaded said:
Fuck you dude. The rense article has tons of data. Why dont you actually read it instead of pretending you did.

Nobody believes you elitest cocksuckers. For a while you social justice whores were trying to say that race didnt exist. Look what happened to that argument. It fizzled out because no matter how prestigious the professors were who invented the “race doesnt exist” notion, the internet is a fair playing field and appeals to authority cant win if the argument in question is fallacious and ridiculous.

i get that you think posturing as if you speak from authority and saying things matter of factly like “there is no evidence of genetic intelligence traits”

and trying to dump the burden of proof in my backyard makes your argument appear genuine, but this is the internet. This is not a courtroom, and you are not a good looking charismatic lawyer. If you want to win an argument on the internet you have to be defending the truth.

but you are not defending the truth. You are defending peoples feelings.

Why dont you answer the following question.

“do you think the selection pressure towards higher intelligence in europe was equally as strong in subsaharan hunter gatherer tribes?”

if you dont answer this question you basically prove my argument.

from an occamesque point of view, it makes no sense to think that evolution led to all human brains having equal potential to achieve the same adult intelligence. That is very far fetched and unreasonable. Why would everything be equal? Who controls the dna that grows humans brains so that all brains are equal?

my dad was Always strong in math/science and was valedictorian of his med school without trying overly hard. I slept through every math science class in high school and still getting about a 99-100% avg on my way to attending the #1 uni on earth.

i could have taught AP physics when i was 12 years old it was that much of a joke to me.

answer me this: why did i have such an easy time in math and science like my dad did? If all brains were created equal, then why was everybody else in my class sweating bullets trying to learn stuff that was simply natural to me?

if math science potential is all nurture like you seem to contend, then isnt it truly a coincidence that my dad and i both developed into 1/1000 rarity math science whiz kids? The probability of that happening by chance is 1 in a million. So basically you are full of shit.

The burden of proof is on you. Why in the holy trinity of clownfuck would everybodys iq potential be the same? Thats like doing 100 random turns on a rubiks cube and happening to end up with a perfectly solved cube. Probability is not on your side

the much more reasonable argument is the one with fewest Assumptions. The idea that “all intelligences are born equal” is a very big assumption and it is not justified by anything other than wishing for the world to be delicate with peoples feelings. The idea that “intelligence potential or iq is genetically influenced and varies from person to person” is a much much smaller assumption to make at the start.

The truth is there is absolutely no evidence that intelligence potential Is the same in all humans.

According to you, what is the reason you think “all intelligence potentials are the same at birth” is a reasonable or justified assumption to make?

why?

why? Because the alternative hurts alot of peoples feelings?

Why on earth would someone possibly think that it would be reasonable to assume everything is created equal? Because lincoln said it and everything he said must be true.

i already posted a link filled with authentic information/data on racial iq studies that proves my point of view.

now lets see you prove that a hunter gatherer tribe would reward a child of naturally higher aptitude with genetic fitness and increased procreation at the same level as the same child would be rewarded in a sophisticated european society.

if you dont address this question then accept your loss of the argument and shut the fuck up.

968335.jpeg
 
14157702:Monsieur_Patate said:
This is not a study, it's a blog post without any actual data.

I don't doubt that there are plenty of those bigot takes online, you're certainly not the only racist on the internet. But this is not what I asked for. I asked for some data, as in a peer reviewed academic study showing causation (correlation doesn't mean shit).

Keep trying.

“Muh p-peer r-reveue hurr durr. Muss havr muh peer reveue“

dude people like you are literally cancer.

you think intellectualism is a participation trophy and all you have to do is give effort and act stubborn in arguments. But youre wrong. Intellectualism depends mostly on how smart your parents were. You cant fake it.

ppl like you regurgitate shit you read and dont know how to come up with an original seminal idea to save your life. On shark tank you would be one of the losers who starts crying and sobbing about how much hard work u put into your solar powered george foreman grill that takes 90 minutes to cook a burger on a sunny day. You are literally that pathetic.

Do you even know what perr reviewed means or do you just throw that out there whenever you pull a defense mechanism to protect your argument from being crushed.
 
Dude just stop non of this is true.

14157713:DolanReloaded said:
“Muh p-peer r-reveue hurr durr. Muss havr muh peer reveue“

dude people like you are literally cancer.

you think intellectualism is a participation trophy and all you have to do is give effort and act stubborn in arguments. But youre wrong. Intellectualism depends mostly on how smart your parents were. You cant fake it.

ppl like you regurgitate shit you read and dont know how to come up with an original seminal idea to save your life. On shark tank you would be one of the losers who starts crying and sobbing about how much hard work u put into your solar powered george foreman grill that takes 90 minutes to cook a burger on a sunny day. You are literally that pathetic.

Do you even know what perr reviewed means or do you just throw that out there whenever you pull a defense mechanism to protect your argument from being crushed.
 
14157714:snowfinder said:
Dude just stop non of this is true.

Oh its not?

oh ok sorry, i guess i was mistaken. Thanks for correcting my faulty logic with your mountain of evidence here!

but seriously, i hope you know next time you pray to God that your father will start letting you fuck him in the ass again the way he used to—God not only is not listening to you.... He doesnt even know you exist. That is how subverted and pathetic you are with your bully pulpit speaking from authority shit.

did you even go to college?

**This post was edited on Jul 18th 2020 at 7:38:21am
 
14157713:DolanReloaded said:
“Muh p-peer r-reveue hurr durr. Muss havr muh peer reveue“

dude people like you are literally cancer.

you think intellectualism is a participation trophy and all you have to do is give effort and act stubborn in arguments. But youre wrong. Intellectualism depends mostly on how smart your parents were. You cant fake it.

ppl like you regurgitate shit you read and dont know how to come up with an original seminal idea to save your life. On shark tank you would be one of the losers who starts crying and sobbing about how much hard work u put into your solar powered george foreman grill that takes 90 minutes to cook a burger on a sunny day. You are literally that pathetic.

Do you even know what perr reviewed means or do you just throw that out there whenever you pull a defense mechanism to protect your argument from being crushed.

A princeton grad would have supplied numerous peer reviewed studies this far into a discussion.
 
14157711:DolanReloaded said:
Fuck you dude. The rense article has tons of data. Why dont you actually read it instead of pretending you did.

Nobody believes you elitest cocksuckers. For a while you social justice whores were trying to say that race didnt exist. Look what happened to that argument. It fizzled out because no matter how prestigious the professors were who invented the “race doesnt exist” notion, the internet is a fair playing field and appeals to authority cant win if the argument in question is fallacious and ridiculous.

i get that you think posturing as if you speak from authority and saying things matter of factly like “there is no evidence of genetic intelligence traits”

and trying to dump the burden of proof in my backyard makes your argument appear genuine, but this is the internet. This is not a courtroom, and you are not a good looking charismatic lawyer. If you want to win an argument on the internet you have to be defending the truth.

but you are not defending the truth. You are defending peoples feelings.

Why dont you answer the following question.

“do you think the selection pressure towards higher intelligence in europe was equally as strong in subsaharan hunter gatherer tribes?”

if you dont answer this question you basically prove my argument.

from an occamesque point of view, it makes no sense to think that evolution led to all human brains having equal potential to achieve the same adult intelligence. That is very far fetched and unreasonable. Why would everything be equal? Who controls the dna that grows humans brains so that all brains are equal?

my dad was Always strong in math/science and was valedictorian of his med school without trying overly hard. I slept through every math science class in high school and still getting about a 99-100% avg on my way to attending the #1 uni on earth.

i could have taught AP physics when i was 12 years old it was that much of a joke to me.

answer me this: why did i have such an easy time in math and science like my dad did? If all brains were created equal, then why was everybody else in my class sweating bullets trying to learn stuff that was simply natural to me?

if math science potential is all nurture like you seem to contend, then isnt it truly a coincidence that my dad and i both developed into 1/1000 rarity math science whiz kids? The probability of that happening by chance is 1 in a million. So basically you are full of shit.

The burden of proof is on you. Why in the holy trinity of clownfuck would everybodys iq potential be the same? Thats like doing 100 random turns on a rubiks cube and happening to end up with a perfectly solved cube. Probability is not on your side

the much more reasonable argument is the one with fewest Assumptions. The idea that “all intelligences are born equal” is a very big assumption and it is not justified by anything other than wishing for the world to be delicate with peoples feelings. The idea that “intelligence potential or iq is genetically influenced and varies from person to person” is a much much smaller assumption to make at the start.

The truth is there is absolutely no evidence that intelligence potential Is the same in all humans.

According to you, what is the reason you think “all intelligence potentials are the same at birth” is a reasonable or justified assumption to make?

why?

why? Because the alternative hurts alot of peoples feelings?

Why on earth would someone possibly think that it would be reasonable to assume everything is created equal? Because lincoln said it and everything he said must be true?

i already posted a link filled with authentic information/data on racial iq studies that proves my point of view.

now lets see you prove that a hunter gatherer tribe would reward a child of naturally higher aptitude with genetic fitness and increased procreation at the same level as the same child would be rewarded in a sophisticated european society.

if you dont address this question then accept your loss of the argument and shut the fuck up.

**This post was edited on Jul 18th 2020 at 7:29:27am

giphy.gif
 
14157711:DolanReloaded said:
Fuck you dude. The rense article has tons of data. Why dont you actually read it instead of pretending you did.

Nobody believes you elitest cocksuckers. For a while you social justice whores were trying to say that race didnt exist. Look what happened to that argument. It fizzled out because no matter how prestigious the professors were who invented the “race doesnt exist” notion, the internet is a fair playing field and appeals to authority cant win if the argument in question is fallacious and ridiculous.

i get that you think posturing as if you speak from authority and saying things matter of factly like “there is no evidence of genetic intelligence traits”

and trying to dump the burden of proof in my backyard makes your argument appear genuine, but this is the internet. This is not a courtroom, and you are not a good looking charismatic lawyer. If you want to win an argument on the internet you have to be defending the truth.

but you are not defending the truth. You are defending peoples feelings.

Why dont you answer the following question.

“do you think the selection pressure towards higher intelligence in europe was equally as strong in subsaharan hunter gatherer tribes?”

if you dont answer this question you basically prove my argument.

from an occamesque point of view, it makes no sense to think that evolution led to all human brains having equal potential to achieve the same adult intelligence. That is very far fetched and unreasonable. Why would everything be equal? Who controls the dna that grows humans brains so that all brains are equal?

my dad was Always strong in math/science and was valedictorian of his med school without trying overly hard. I slept through every math science class in high school and still getting about a 99-100% avg on my way to attending the #1 uni on earth.

i could have taught AP physics when i was 12 years old it was that much of a joke to me.

answer me this: why did i have such an easy time in math and science like my dad did? If all brains were created equal, then why was everybody else in my class sweating bullets trying to learn stuff that was simply natural to me?

if math science potential is all nurture like you seem to contend, then isnt it truly a coincidence that my dad and i both developed into 1/1000 rarity math science whiz kids? The probability of that happening by chance is 1 in a million. So basically you are full of shit.

The burden of proof is on you. Why in the holy trinity of clownfuck would everybodys iq potential be the same? Thats like doing 100 random turns on a rubiks cube and happening to end up with a perfectly solved cube. Probability is not on your side

the much more reasonable argument is the one with fewest Assumptions. The idea that “all intelligences are born equal” is a very big assumption and it is not justified by anything other than wishing for the world to be delicate with peoples feelings. The idea that “intelligence potential or iq is genetically influenced and varies from person to person” is a much much smaller assumption to make at the start.

The truth is there is absolutely no evidence that intelligence potential Is the same in all humans.

According to you, what is the reason you think “all intelligence potentials are the same at birth” is a reasonable or justified assumption to make?

why?

why? Because the alternative hurts alot of peoples feelings?

Why on earth would someone possibly think that it would be reasonable to assume everything is created equal? Because lincoln said it and everything he said must be true?

i already posted a link filled with authentic information/data on racial iq studies that proves my point of view.

now lets see you prove that a hunter gatherer tribe would reward a child of naturally higher aptitude with genetic fitness and increased procreation at the same level as the same child would be rewarded in a sophisticated european society.

if you dont address this question then accept your loss of the argument and shut the fuck up.

**This post was edited on Jul 18th 2020 at 7:29:27am

I don't know why I'm replying to you, but check out the book "Guns, Germs, and Steel" by Jared Diamond. It refutes many of the statements you're making here.

Also, nature vs nurture, ever heard of it?
 
14157711:DolanReloaded said:
Fuck you dude. The rense article has tons of data.

now lets see you prove that a hunter gatherer tribe would reward a child of naturally higher aptitude with genetic fitness and increased procreation at the same level as the same child would be rewarded in a sophisticated european society.

if you dont address this question then accept your loss of the argument and shut the fuck up.

No, your article has zero relevant data to your claim that there is causation between race and intelligence. Zero.

Then, I see you're still trying to digress and put words in my mouth to try and weasel your way out of the argument. I won't bite, I never made any claim that "a hunter gatherer tribe would reward a child" or whatever, this is another irrelevant point you brought up to try and muddy the water.

Again simple facts so you can follow:

- You made a claim that there is causation between race and intelligence

- Burden of proof is on you

- You failed to provide any data or facts to back up your claim

Ergo, you're full of shit. But we already knew that! :)

As a footnote, you asking snowfinder for evidence when you have failed to provide any since the beginning of this discussion. Oh the irony.
 
Meth is one hell of a drug.

14157715:DolanReloaded said:
Oh its not?

oh ok sorry, i guess i was mistaken. Thanks for correcting my faulty logic with your mountain of evidence here!

but seriously, i hope you know next time you pray to God that your father will start letting you fuck him in the ass again the way he used to—God not only is not listening to you.... He doesnt even know you exist. That is how subverted and pathetic you are with your bully pulpit speaking from authority shit.

did you even go to college?

**This post was edited on Jul 18th 2020 at 7:38:21am
 
14157713:DolanReloaded said:
“Muh p-peer r-reveue hurr durr. Muss havr muh peer reveue“

dude people like you are literally cancer.

you think intellectualism is a participation trophy and all you have to do is give effort and act stubborn in arguments. But youre wrong. Intellectualism depends mostly on how smart your parents were. You cant fake it.

ppl like you regurgitate shit you read and dont know how to come up with an original seminal idea to save your life. On shark tank you would be one of the losers who starts crying and sobbing about how much hard work u put into your solar powered george foreman grill that takes 90 minutes to cook a burger on a sunny day. You are literally that pathetic.

Do you even know what perr reviewed means or do you just throw that out there whenever you pull a defense mechanism to protect your argument from being crushed.

Since you apparently have the intelligence and knowledge to teach AP physics at 12 years old...what discoveries or research have you done personally? Academia definitely blows but it has its reasons for blowing. I wouldn't want someone's research to be purely anecdotal if it's something that will affect me.
 
Being valedictorian of ones medical school (a lot of medical schools don't even have these FWIW so I'm going to doubt the veracity of your claims, they have the AOA) doesn't mean they're the "smartest". The smartest doctors are the ones who do the best on the STEP exams.
 
14157757:jca said:
I don't know why I'm replying to you, but check out the book "Guns, Germs, and Steel" by Jared Diamond. It refutes many of the statements you're making here.

Also, nature vs nurture, ever heard of it?

Why dont you post the refutations, instead of alluding to reading a book that apparently attacks science
 
14157793:.MASSHOLE. said:
Being valedictorian of ones medical school (a lot of medical schools don't even have these FWIW so I'm going to doubt the veracity of your claims, they have the AOA) doesn't mean they're the "smartest". The smartest doctors are the ones who do the best on the STEP exams.

Haha. Do you idiots ever realizing that your denial about my claims only serves to let everybody know that you have (had) an inflated self esteem that surpassed what you deserved as a result of your parents never smacking you when you acted like (and became) a spoiled brat piece of shit?

”hurr durr if i believe dolan that means i must be a loser so im gonna deny his claims so i can protect muh self esteems hurr durr”

**This post was edited on Jul 19th 2020 at 1:47:32am
 
14157789:Lonely said:
Since you apparently have the intelligence and knowledge to teach AP physics at 12 years old...what discoveries or research have you done personally? Academia definitely blows but it has its reasons for blowing. I wouldn't want someone's research to be purely anecdotal if it's something that will affect me.

Why are you telling me what a princeton grad would do. Im the princeton grad here, not you.

People who have a bunch of self esteem protecting rules that govern anybody they are willing to admit is superior to them are literally chimpanzees.

Stay put donkey kong im going to go grab my peer reviewed paper about how you masturbate to pictures of bananas.

**This post was edited on Jul 19th 2020 at 1:42:34am
 
14157853:DolanReloaded said:
Why are you telling me what a princeton grad would do. Im the princeton grad here, not you.

Didn't someone call you out in another thread to post your diploma?
 
14157853:DolanReloaded said:
Why are you telling me what a princeton grad would do. Im the princeton grad here, not you.

People who have a bunch of self esteem protecting rules that govern anybody they are willing to admit are superior to them are literally chimpanzees.

Stay put donkey kong im going to go grab my peer reviewed paper about how you masturbate to pictures of bananas.

Bruh, a University of Phoenix student forms more intelligent arguments then you.
 
14157851:DolanReloaded said:
Why dont you post the refutations, instead of alluding to reading a book that apparently attacks science

Just thought you'd find it good food for thought, it seemed a bit oversimplified to me and I wouldn't take it as gospel but the information he presents was super interesting.

I also don't give nearly enough fucks to have an internet argument with you.
 
14157760:Monsieur_Patate said:
No, your article has zero relevant data to your claim that there is causation between race and intelligence. Zero.

Then, I see you're still trying to digress and put words in my mouth to try and weasel your way out of the argument. I won't bite, I never made any claim that "a hunter gatherer tribe would reward a child" or whatever, this is another irrelevant point you brought up to try and muddy the water.

Again simple facts so you can follow:

- You made a claim that there is causation between race and intelligence

- Burden of proof is on you

- You failed to provide any data or facts to back up your claim

Ergo, you're full of shit. But we already knew that! :)

As a footnote, you asking snowfinder for evidence when you have failed to provide any since the beginning of this discussion. Oh the irony.

Dude you are the one who keeps dodging answering the question about selection pressure differences between 2 very different levels of society like prehistoric europe and prehistoric subsaharan africa.

you keep dodging this, so you are the one who is full of shit.

And fyi, about 1000 people a day are switching from your ridiculous point of view to my infinitely more reasonable point of view.

literally nobody buys the arguments you authority pulling assholes are trying to pull with your “everyone is equal” horse shit.

nobody.

youre wasting your time trying to convince people of things they already know are complete and utter bullshit.

and your an asshole for trying to convince people that you actually believe the horse shit you say.

youre not going to win this one monseur potato.

people are not as dumb as you think.

trying to say that only peer reviewed (muh beer revue hurr durr) papers are legit is a biased logical fallacy (appeal to authority) because most academic journals will not publish papers that support the role of genetics in ethnic iq gaps.

If you are legit then tell me that the selection pressure towards higher intelligence is the same between an advanced and sophisticated society in europe and a tribal society in subsaharan africa. Go ahead and serve up that dinner plate of feces and see if you can convince people smarter than you to eat it and then say thanks and ask for seconds.

smart people dont eat feces monseur. You pretend to eat the plate of feces but everybody knows you dont eat feces yourself and you are only pretending that you eat the feces.

btw what college did you go to?

did you even go to college?

Stop trying to posture as if you are more connected to the academic world than i am. My senior thesis took about 1000 hours of work to complete. I didnt go through all that to get my paper published in a science journal so i could one day get belittled by a pseudointellectual loser like you.

im a much stronger authority than you monseur. Im a stem major from the #1 uni on the planet and you have a politics major at a local community college or state school.

nobody pays attention to the opinions of someone like you. They dont matter. You dont matter.

stop pretending as if you were grounded in reality with your complete bullshit argument.

”hurr burr hurr hurr ebrybuddy iz da same brain hurr durr hurr hurr... lebron games could habs discuberd generals relativaty hurr durr... ebrybuddy is same hurr durr hurr hurr”

just shut the fuck up already with your politically correct bullshit. Nobody is taking the bait on something you dont even believe yourself

**This post was edited on Jul 18th 2020 at 11:55:01pm
 
14157853:DolanReloaded said:
Why are you telling me what a princeton grad would do. Im the princeton grad here, not you.

People who have a bunch of self esteem protecting rules that govern anybody they are willing to admit are superior to them are literally chimpanzees.

Stay put donkey kong im going to go grab my peer reviewed paper about how you masturbate to pictures of bananas.

Lol princeton? Barely top 10. No one forces anyone to get peer-reviewed. It's a choice. And you didn't go to princeton
 
14157861:DolanReloaded said:
Dude you are the one who keeps dodging answering the question about selection pressure differences between 2 very different levels of society like prehistoric europe and prehistoric subsaharan africa.

you keep dodging this, so you are the one who is full of shit.

And fyi, about 1000 people a day are switching from your ridiculous point of view to my infinitely more reasonable point of view.

literally nobody buys the arguments you authority pulling assholes are trying to pull with your “everyone is equal” horse shit.

nobody.

youre wasting your time trying to convince people of things they already know are complete and utter bullshit.

and your an asshole for trying to convince people that you actually believe the horse shit you say.

youre not going to win this one monseur potato.

people are not as dumb as you think.

trying to say that only peer reviewed (muh beer revue hurr durr) papers are legit is a biased logical fallacy (appeal to authority) because most academic journals will not publish papers that support the role of genetics in ethnic iq gaps.

If you are legit then tell me that the selection pressure towards higher intelligence is the same between an advanced and sophisticated society in europe and a tribal society in subsaharan africa. Go ahead and serve up that dinner plate of feces and see if you can convince people smarter than you to eat it and then say thanks and ask for seconds.

smart people dont eat feces monseur. You pretend to eat the plate of feces but everybody knows you dont eat feces yourself and you are only pretending that you eat the feces.

btw what college did you go to?

did you even go to college?

Stop trying to posture as if you are more connected to the academic world than i am. My senior thesis took about 1000 hours of work to complete. I didnt go through all that to get my paper published in a science journal so i could one day get belittled by a pseudointellectual loser like you.

im a much stronger authority than you monseur. Im a stem major from the #1 uni on the planet and you have a politics major at a local community college or state school.

nobody pays attention to the opinions of someone like you. They dont matter. You dont matter.

stop pretending as if you were grounded in reality with your complete bullshit argument.

”hurr burr hurr hurr ebrybuddy iz da same brain hurr durr hurr hurr... lebron games could habs discuberd generals relativaty hurr durr... ebrybuddy is same hurr durr hurr hurr”

just shut the fuck up already with your politically correct bullshit. Nobody is taking the bait on something you dont even believe yourself

**This post was edited on Jul 18th 2020 at 11:55:01pm

I'm going to just copy paste myself here since you're still deflecting:

- You made a claim that there is causation between race and intelligence

- Burden of proof is on you

- You failed to provide any data or facts to back up your claim

I see you're now switching to ad hominem attacks to try and keep deflecting, interesting.

Looking forward to your reply.
 
Back
Top