Marker jester vs. axial 2 120 ti.
- Thread starter BoB11
- Start date
danedegruyter
Active member
marker is commin back, watch out
skier_boy26
Active member
Kind of a strange comparison, don't you think?
It doesn't sound like you need a high din binding if p12s sufficed, so the axial should be just fine. Even if you did need something with more housing, you could easily get something like an FKS 155 (or even a p18) for at least $100 cheaper, and they're tried and true (although the Jester has good reviews thus far and doesn't seem too shabby, except for the price tag.
It doesn't sound like you need a high din binding if p12s sufficed, so the axial should be just fine. Even if you did need something with more housing, you could easily get something like an FKS 155 (or even a p18) for at least $100 cheaper, and they're tried and true (although the Jester has good reviews thus far and doesn't seem too shabby, except for the price tag.
mtsteeze406
Member
i got jesters and i honestly think the price tag is worth it. the plastic isnt the flimsy shit, and they just have an overall solid feels. but as everyone has said, durability is still up in the air.
I'll be riding the Jesters this year on my Volkl Walls. I'll post a small review. But I think Marker is back. The Jesters design is great, it gives the ski more flex because of the new toe design. My expectations for these bindings are high but we will see at the end of the season.
