Marker Griffons Vs Tyrolia attack 13's

Dkim_10

Member
Whats the diffrence between these 2 bindings?Pros and cons for each? Which one is lighter? Better for park? Which on is more reliable? K+ for helping
 
Everyone bashes on Griffions but they really aren't a bad binding if you set them up proper they work glorious. I am about 160 ish geared up and ski at a din of 9 on my soft snow skis and 8 ish on my park skis (I don't ride park much, more so for dicking around when there is no snow) and haven't had any problems. I regularly huck cliffs 20 down and 20 out and I like to think I charge pretty hard around the resort most days. I have had no binding explosions or pre releasing. I went through a pair of z12s and blew up the toe piece in less than 8 days. Since the griffion toe got revised a few years ago they seem to have a lot left problems than the original complete plastic toe. I sell the attacks at the shop I work at they seem to be one hell of a binding so really i would end up going by price. I pretty sure the weight difference is negligible especially since it has very little affect on swing weight due to where they sit on the ski. Stack height I believe is within a few millimetres which you probably won't notice. Anyways good luck on your decision both are solid bindings.
 
13584909:mole.squad said:
tyrolia all day. had griffons when i was like 14 and about 120lbs and i demolished them

13584915:soupcan said:
Everyone bashes on Griffions but they really aren't a bad binding if you set them up proper they work glorious. I am about 160 ish geared up and ski at a din of 9 on my soft snow skis and 8 ish on my park skis (I don't ride park much, more so for dicking around when there is no snow) and haven't had any problems. I regularly huck cliffs 20 down and 20 out and I like to think I charge pretty hard around the resort most days. I have had no binding explosions or pre releasing. I went through a pair of z12s and blew up the toe piece in less than 8 days. Since the griffion toe got revised a few years ago they seem to have a lot left problems than the original complete plastic toe. I sell the attacks at the shop I work at they seem to be one hell of a binding so really i would end up going by price. I pretty sure the weight difference is negligible especially since it has very little affect on swing weight due to where they sit on the ski. Stack height I believe is within a few millimetres which you probably won't notice. Anyways good luck on your decision both are solid bindings.

Thanks Im just gonna go with the tyrolia attack 13s but what about the 4frnt attack 13s? Whats the difference between the 2 or are they just rebranded? Bc I wanted to know which one would be better the tyrolia or 4frnt attacks
 
13584926:Dkim_10 said:
Thanks Im just gonna go with the tyrolia attack 13s but what about the 4frnt attack 13s? Whats the difference between the 2 or are they just rebranded? Bc I wanted to know which one would be better the tyrolia or 4frnt attacks

rebranded fosho
 
13584926:Dkim_10 said:
Thanks Im just gonna go with the tyrolia attack 13s but what about the 4frnt attack 13s? Whats the difference between the 2 or are they just rebranded? Bc I wanted to know which one would be better the tyrolia or 4frnt attacks

As the other chap said, there just re-branded. Head, Elan, Fischer and 4FRNT use re-branded Tyrolia's as their bindings.
 
tyrolia all day, though griffons aren't a bad binding in general. Tyrolia are cheaper and lighter and therefore my choice. Im rocking mine on a pair of Icelantics and want looked back
 
Back
Top