Marker Griffon or Look PX12 Jib?

[meckel]

I'm looking for good quality bindings that handle all mountain and terrain park well. I've narrowed it down to these two options but I can't choose between them. I'm 5'11 and 155lbs.

 

[snakerton]

I have griffons and my friend has axial 2 (same as px 12) and we've both never had any problems. my griffons have lasted 2 seasons and counting. I only weight 140 so if youre a lot bigger you might wanna go with jesters.

 

[pfoulger]

I've had a few LOOKs and I've broken toepeices left and right. On the other hand I've had a few Markers and they are bombproof. I'd go Markers.

 

[Surfboard]

See Matt looks/Rossi aren't good

 

[Park.]

owned a pair of markers that shit out on me multiple times, picked up a pair of fks 14s for park and px jib 14s for bumps and could not be happier. by far the best quality binding i have had. the 12s might be different from the 14s though, so do a little research and stop trying to be spoon fed by NS people.

 

[meckel]

Why the hell is this thread still up? For some reason the thread got duplicated and posted twice? All the people on the other thread were in favor of the Look PX12's

 

[Surfboard]

Isn't that why there's a forum for gear haha... Dumbass

 

[TARV]

Griffons are cheap on backcountry .com

 

[Park.]

this is geartalk... retard

 

[meckel]

The Look PX12's have 25mm of elastic heel travel which is the most heel travel on the market to prevent pre-releasing.

 

[_Jeffrey_]

i love the look px series, never had any problems with them

 

[.squirrely.]

every other skier in the world would probably say the opposite

 

[snakerton]

I depends which look toe piece.

 

[broto]

nah i'm for griffons too. can't say anything about the looks, but i'm 5'11" 160 pounds and haven't done anything but bend brakes on griffons in 3 years on them. they do me gud

 

[Balbertt]

Dont get marker.. I am sure many will agree.