Mango 100

animator

Active member
Yo did anyone see these? The graphic is sick as hell. Super stoked they’re still pumping out skis [tag=3025]@iggyskier[/tag] you guys are cracked

1041992.png
 
These skis look insane, wish I could try a pair I just don’t have 800 to throw for skis, ever :(. Interested to hear what the updated flex / rocker pattern skis like.
 
14434536:weastcoat said:
These skis look insane, wish I could try a pair I just don’t have 800 to throw for skis, ever :(. Interested to hear what the updated flex / rocker pattern skis like.

I second this. I am head over heels for my mag 102s, but imo they needed a more even flex pattern. These could be the golden mf ticket!!

big ups [tag=3025]@iggyskier[/tag] n the whole crew
 
Still mind boggling that they make a Jeff 102 in 191 but not the mango 100.

I’m 6’3 and sure tons of guys my height would love the 191 for park
 
14434730:Coleg55 said:
Still mind boggling that they make a Jeff 102 in 191 but not the mango 100.

I’m 6’3 and sure tons of guys my height would love the 191 for park

I'm sure sales metric's would solve your confusion.
 
14435639:Session said:
I'm sure sales metric's would solve your confusion.

But not even in custom can you do a 190+ mango 100 or 110. jeffereys 191 are very heavily recommended around hear for tall people
 
14435800:Coleg55 said:
But not even in custom can you do a 190+ mango 100 or 110. jeffereys 191 are very heavily recommended around hear for tall people

Generally, anything is possible. Never know until you ask.
 
14435841:Session said:
Generally, anything is possible. Never know until you ask.

Tbh you’re probably right. It’s not on the builder but I bet they’d try or have it already in the works
 
I've been riding mango 100's all year and they're awesome. They seem a little stiffer than the Crushin Cans 102 but they are just so good at everything, stable at speed, predictable, confident, etc. So hyped on the official topsheet too, my lord.
 
14435963:Schoess said:
I've been riding mango 100's all year and they're awesome. They seem a little stiffer than the Crushin Cans 102 but they are just so good at everything, stable at speed, predictable, confident, etc. So hyped on the official topsheet too, my lord.

They’re stiffer than the cans??
 
14436125:animator said:
They’re stiffer than the cans??

They are slightly softer and rounder than the Magnus 102 / Crushin' Cans 102. Not substantial in the difference, just a bit so. Weight wise, varies by size but about 150 grams lighter/pair as well (about 1/3 of a pound per pair). That + less boxy tip does lower swing weight on the ends. Not as easy to throw around as the 90, but noticeable compared to the 102 while still remaining plenty stable.
 
Back
Top