Man kills Two, injures Seven in Night Club Shooting

You know a discussion has elevated into no-fucks-given territory when someone draws the Hitler Card.

14669a.jpg
.
 
You wacky Euros....

"An armed society is a polite society."

Not to mention, government is already way, way too involved in the lives of the people.
 
So you are saying that you don't give a fuck about Hitler and what he did? You didn't have to tell me that, I already knew that you were a spineless piece of shit, kid.
 
The point is that Hitler or Nazis have no place in this conversation, numbnuts. And your argument that I somehow approve of their actions and am somehow spineless are equally irrelevant.

Did you find that rake yet?
 
How could Hitler and Nazis have no place in a conversation about guns and power grabs, numbnuts? Unless they didn't use guns and abuse power maybe there is some nuance that I'm missing? When did I claim that you approve of their actions? I asked if you truly did give not a single fuck about history, like you said was the case. Where did I supposedly claim that you approve what they did?

"no-fucks-given territory when someone draws the Hitler Card"

You are spineless for the simple fact that you would let and prefer another man have power over yourself just because you are afraid to use or possess a gun. Hey, I'm glad that you deny being spineless but you won't deny being a piece of shit. bahahahahah

Did you go back under your bridge yet?
 
lol! Go to Oprah!

Next time I will remember that Hitler offends people before any mention of his name. What if I used the Gulag as an example instead? Still irrelevant to guns, right?
 
What makes it a shitty example? Is it too dramatic or just too long ago for you to remember? It's actually a really good example of what happens when the wrong people have control over the public and overstep boundaries. The people that sound like idiots are the ones who fail to notice the importance of history and fundamental rights.
 
How do you snipe with a knife? Or try to attack anyone and succesfully kill two and injue seven when you're a little pip-squeak like the shooter? This was a case of short mental relapse and the fact that he had the weapons in his reach made this possible.
 
I'm not afraid of guns. I'm pretty handy with an assault rifle and handgun myself. The thing is, me arguing against weapons, doesn't that make you the spineless one here (you like that word don't you), someone who is afraid to go on without guns? You seem to be afraid of this power grab situation very much, just like I asked earlier in the thread about your fear mongering house invasion scenario.

History - be it gulags, Nazis, fucking Pol Pot - no place in this conversation about a night club shooter, the reasons behind that attack and what the consequences of that event could be.
 
I never claimed that people should not be trusted to have guns in their homes, that was you....

"Well, he's right. If the weapons were stored in a single location under heavy/tough guard, such as in a hunting club or shooting range, he wouldn't have gotten his hands on weapons last night and maybe this would have never happened. "

bahahahaha! Sounds pretty spineless to me. By the way I only called you spineless once before this so with that mentality I must like plenty of words. Are those tough guards using guns lol? I bet.

I already apologized for my example frightening you. It was meant to be realistic more than anything. :(

"just like I asked earlier in the thread about your fear mongering house invasion scenario."

You never asked anything along those lines you deluded kid...

You must be confusing this conversation with one that you are having with another ns member. I never made a single mention of a night club shooter, maybe this is about the guns. Ya, history has no place in a conversation about guns in the present. Brilliant.
 
"...I already knew that you were a spineless piece of shit, kid."

One.

"You are spineless for the simple fact that you..."

Two. And now of course marks the third time.

Now then, I did actually say "Fear mongering much?" It's a question, isn't it? House invasions aren't exactly common here nor are the chances of anyone retaliating to one with guns, so that argument was out the window from the beginning.

Yes, you never made a single mention of the shooter although that's what the thread is about, weird. This thread has no place for your history bullshit that's completely unrelated to this incident, that's all I'm saying.

 
No I called you spineless once then you questioned how you could be spineless so I had to explain, "You are spineless for the simple fact that you...."

So we're still stuck on just one.

House invasions aren't common where you live? Cool story brah, they are common where other people live.

"It's a question, isn't it?"

It is a question but not a question that pertains to the claim you made that I am afraid of something. It just sounds like you're asking me if I am mongering fear, not in fear myself...

So first you said that the "history bullshit" doesn't have a place in the conversation but now you say it does have a place in the conversation just has no place in the thread. The conversation is part of the thread though, weird.

Just curious, what makes my example "bullshit"??? Are you saying that Hitler never did what he did? Or just simply things that happened in history have no place for discussion in present day? History has no relation to present day at all, right?

479642.jpeg

Oh you must've missed my earlier question. Do the tough guards use guns?
 
What I'm saying is that you're a troll alias considering all this Hitler and historical pandering. No simple idiot can be so nitpicky except for the purpose of trying to rustle some jimmies.

Under heavy/tough guard/protection doesn't pertain to human guards, but more likely vaults and more strongly held gun lockers under supervision by CCTV, alarms etc.

The fact that some people in some place in the world want to abolish or lessen gun culture doesn't make it compulsory for everyone around the world to do the same, so even that line of your argument is invalid.

Rake, find.

 
Actually this is my only NS account, so what you're saying is untrue. The only person being nitpicky is you. Getting your panties in a bunch when I "generalize" instead of using personal examples? Being such a meathead that you can't even allow let alone consider historical examples in a conversation....

I never ever claimed that cultures trying to lessen gun use should become compulsory for everyone else. So that line of my "argument" is actually non-existent. But lessening/abolishing freedoms and handing over power of authority is a different story.

Bridge, find.
 
Back
Top