Skiierman,
You have pointed out a few good points, and I agree with some of your statements, specifically the point about the lamp posts that were knocked down and the plane's backwash knocking the cars off of the road. I agree that there is no marker to tell which way the posts actually fell. And yes, the plane wouldn't blow the cars off the road if it flew over them (but I think he was making a point about the plane sliding on the ground before it hit, like the reports suggest.
Let's go through picture by picture:
#1 Set of Photos (poor quality) of plane hitting tower.
Now I agree that these are very bad quality for deciding when the plane actually made impact. But I can say this. Do you see the orange light? Aluminum encased carbon in the nose of the plane does not create fire or any explosion on impact with glass, steel, and concrete. There is no fuel stored up there either. Fire requires a chemical process know as combustion. Combustion requires 3 things: Fuel, Oxygen, and an Energy source. There is obviously nothing there to provide as a fuel source (or an energy source for that matter)... so where did the fuel come from to make the orange flash???
#2 Picture of the 2 smoking towers.
I see you have circled 2 grey smoke clouds. That is all I can see other than a little debris coming off the top of the right tower. And if you are referring to the towers collapsing, your circles would leave one to believe that both fell at the same time. And also I cannot tell by those pictures that towers are even collapsing at all. Sure some debris is going to fall off... they were hit by airplanes.
#3 2 Photos showing Light Posts
I completely agree with you that there is know way to tell which direction the poles are going. So yes, it is a very weak argument. But in regards to:
"The plane did hit the lawn right before it hit (as shown in the building’s security tape) but didn’t fully impact the lawn like in the airplane crash landing he showed for a poor example"
Could you see anything in the security tape...? I saw nothing... then fire. No plane, nothing at all. You mean the government couldn't release one single frame of part of the plane making impact??? Just one. 6 frames instead of 5? Oh yeah, "was" is a singular verb, and "pieces" is a plural noun.
#4 Test plane being crashed into concrete wall.
Yes that is not a 757. But just incase you didn't know, all airplanes are designed basically the same, with the exception of F-117 stealth. The wings are weakly attached to the fuselage. The basic construction is a titanium/steel frame with an aluminum casing. The wingspan on that test plane appears to be smaller than that of a 757, so actually the wings on the 757 that supposedly hit the pentagon should've broken off slightly easier (due to more torque on the wing attachment).
#5 Box shrouded in Blue tarp.
I thought it hit the pentagon, not Area 51? People can't read important documents from outside of the perimeter.
#6 Piece of circled wreckage in the background
That appears to be the size of a Pontiac sunfire. I hope there are 30 more Pontiac sunfire sized pieces laying around. You're generalizing the size of the wreckage based on one piece. Clearly the other photos show that there are very few pieces that size.
#7 White military trainer aircraft
That picture is just serving as reference to the aircraft parts found in the wreckage. I don't think he's implying that is what hit the pentagon, just the fact that, a different aircraft would have to crash in order for those parts to be present.
#8 2 Photos of pentagon windows
Fire can be seen inside of those windows. There is barely any structural damage to the outside. If a 757 would have hit the exterior of the pentagon, surely there would be more superficial damage to the area around the hole.
#9 Plane with broken nosecone.
Again all commercial aircraft have the same basic structure. Frame with outer aluminum or carbon casing. He is comparing a scenario, not an exact condition.
#10 Plane blowing car off runway.
I completely agree with you.