LineMother ship flites Or Line Elizabeths Or k2 Seth Vicious

the elizabth's are wide as fuck...i saw them at fresh today and jesus christ! they are pretty light too. the seth vicious look even sicker though...your decision i guess

who the fuck are you? who the FUCK are you to say ANYTHING? just fucking die, i beg of you. -mommy

 
last years MotherShips for supper cheep

-*-*-*-*-*-*~*-*-*-*-*

and yes we're talking about dashlonge, da shlong, dash longe, ...his full name is dashielle. just like mike is michael, steve = steven, dick = richard. figure it out kids. you can't be spoon fed your whole lives.

-shradical

Got a sister

This is the result of controled substances in widespread use.-Dave Berry.

-a smart man should be able to spell a word at least two ways -Thomas Jefferson
 
Liz's are like softer skis...more for park but im sure they work in powder! uhm mother ship flites are a blast i skied them for a day in may id say pick either of those

I wish i was a gangster
 
I've Ordered a Pair of Elizabeths for this Winter :)

I haven't tryed them because they don't sell them in Norway.... Thats Crap but, I Managed to get a pair:)

 
flites, best value

JW: Will skiers ever be as “ cool� as skaters? I think we’re trying way too hard.

CV: NO, our sport is way to inaccessible. You cant just go skiing, you need snow, mountains, expensive skis, boots, poles, goggles, clothes and then a car to even get to the mountain and finally pay way too much for a pass. Skating, all you need is a skateboard that is why we will never be “as cool.�

 
I love my Flites. They are so fun to ski. They are really easy to spin in the park because they are nice and light. They also obviously rip and powder days with 97 mm underfoot. I'd say their only downfall in comparison to those other two skis is that they aren't as burly in construction. They won't fold up as well as those other skis. But I've had really good luck with mine. They seem like they hold up very well. Oh yeah and they are cheap, I think you can find them for $450 on the internet. They are sick. Get 'em.

I think rails in general are just a phase. - Anthony Boronowski

*NWFT*
 
What do u ski most? Heaps of ppl are trying to compare lizzy's to seth vicious, motherships ect but its a park ski not a big mtn ski like those. If your skiing park get elizabeth for sure, big mtn/pow vicious/mothership. Just because the elizabeth has a 110 waist doesnt make it a pow ski, but its obviously stuff gonna float in pow.there so light that you wont notice the extra width but rail balance will be great. So i guess it comes down to whether you want a park ski or a pow ski. Also remember the elizabeth is only in 172. But will be in 182 next year apparently

----------------------------------------

SnowPark NZ- www.snowparknz.com

 
^You don't even know how much he weighs bro! Or if he's even considering the bigger sizes in the other two ski which he probably is not since he's considering the Elizabeth. I've skied quite a bit on the Elizabeth and granted at 6' 195 they aren't a big mountain ski for me, but neither are the other two in the lengths he would buy them in. If someone is a relatively small guy the Elizabeth would rock as an everyday ski for big mountain and park.

'Skiing is 90% outfit, 5% equipment, and 5% ability' -Lief Storer

 
check out the line website. the videos tell alot about the ski. the mothership is fat, all mountain, extremely light ski. the elizabeths im not quite sure yet. i still dont understand why erics pro model went from a 186cm to a 172.....wierd for the type of riding he does.
 
cause last year, all the pro-models were "all-mountain twins" so, for an all-mountain twin, Pollard probably likes a 186. This year, apparently he wanted a park ski, and for park you can go shorter.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top