Line Sir Francis Bacons

I just don't see why everyone is flipping out about a picture of the skis, that's not going to tell you anything about the quality
 
Picture002Small.jpg


the new elizabeth, and the sir francis bacons

and the chronic blend demensions are 125-90-113
 
yep, damnit i dont get to do it , im jealous. the elizibeth is still a 172 with 110 undefoot the bacon is 182 with a 115 underfoot, a big elizibieth if you will.
 
took me a second to figure out what the eliz graphic was.....looks like a sperm with some blue blobs but i just noticed it's a naked chick from behind. nice.
 
how tall is pollard? arent they 182's and those are like shorter than him. Or is it just how line measures...but yea i pretty much want those skis
 
ACTUALLY, I remember him saying that they're 172's, special made. Cause I asked why they looked short and he said that they weren't the real size.
 
i wonder how stiff these sir francis bacon things are gonna be...cuz if they're that wide and a 182 i would be led to believe they would float better than the 186 pollards(chronic wides) in the powder...
 
thats crazy!! a ski that long and that fat being softer than the invaders?? is it a full park ski as well or would it still be aiight for bigger guys such as myself (6'2" 190lbs) riding in the pow?? either way they're dope and im definately sticking with LINE from now on, way more progressive than anyone else in all aspects
 
i really want to ski the ones that are just a wider waist invader...or the bacons...or anything else they came out with this year...fack
 
chronic blend is 90 at waist. bacons are 115 at waist and softer than invadors. anthem is invador but with 90 or 92mm waist. and then theres the 150 waist width thing. cant get brakes for it.
 
Back
Top