Line elizabeths good for rails?

[alekbishop1]

hey just wondering if the Elizabeths are good for rails? feedback?

 

[amo]

in the scheme of park skis, no.

 

[alekbishop1]

k thanks

 

[Luc.]

what are u comparing them too? cause i have seen a few edits of people slaying them on rails

 

[MasterOz]

i love mine on rails. dont be afraid of the width. i can still do sw/ ups, 27s on, 450s out and shit.

 

[rep_your_hood]

if youre garett russel, yes. anyone else, kinda sorta not really maybe

 

[fragglemuffin]

lizzies are hands down the most fun rail skis i have ever ridden

 

[family_vacation]

care to elaborate?

 

[fragglemuffin]

IMO the width makes it easier to scissor for switch-ups and spins off, and they are soooooo buttery. I have no problems spinning 450s off and 270s on with them, as well as stomping switchups. Plus, i feel like they give you more balance, again, because of the width.

 

[Twig]

Agreed the width is nice. It has disadvantages, the swing weight is noticeably increased, but I had no problems with my tricks on them either. And they make balance way easier, the flex is so nice for presses and butters and stuff. If your idea of park is more about fun than tech then they are a good ski for you.

 

[steezeball478]

i just gave them a flex in the shop the other day and they are crazy flexy, soooo butter. they actually seemd like they had more flex than the afterbangs

 

[B-runge]

agreed

my bacons feel the same way since im so tall

but

ive skiied lizzys too

and they feel fucking orgasmic

 

[rep_your_hood]

thats cuz they do. the afterbangs arent noodles like the invaders were

 

[Leafman]

if you think they feel sick in the park, they feel even better in powder

 

[B-runge]

sorry but bacons definitely feel better in powder

and ive ridden both....

 

[Leafman]

i've never ridden bacons, but lizzies feel pretty sick

 

[B-runge]

meh

when your tall as fuck

lizzys are butter in park

bacons are i cant believe its not butter in pow

ep pros are butter butter in pow