Line Anthem (2006)

100_0448.JPG
 
if u are asying that marker free 1200s or what ever aren't bad bindings u are terribly wrong... everysinlge person that i know who owns them has broken them multiple times... they suck... i weigh like 120 and i even broke them
 
can you mount one backwards like this years? the graphics look like theyre only supposed to go one way and when i saw the line catalog they were mounted the same way.
 
379 retail. I think it'd be an amazing idea if only they came longer than 178.
 
i know that theyre symmetrical, im asking if theyre meant to be mounted with one backwards like this years were
 
yes u can have one ski one way and flip the other ski around and mount them...wut size are those in the pic? they look dope tho. pickin up a pair next season
 
god dammit noone has answered my fucking question yet. this years version has a graphic on it designed so you can have one ski one way and the other ski flipped. my question is if the graphic on nxt years is designed in the same way or not.
 
its a symmetrical ski, and made to be center mounted

so you can flip it and it wont make a diff exactly like this yrs invaders

same thing just bigger so you would be able to do they samething as you would with the invaders
 
yea word i want to wait for these in 178 but im 6"1 do you reccommend a longer skis like 180 or does the 2 cms not really matter
 
Longer. They're soft and made to center. They'll ski much shorter. I'm 6'2 and couldn't ride them at any size below 185, park or no park.
 
^you guys don't have a clue...fat skis in the park is not even the future, it's now. i ride centermounted moships for a dedicated park ski. the anthem is made for park, it will do fine everywhere else, and the extra width will make it more stable on rails and landings.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top