Let the conspiracies begin

37132428.jpg
 
So because I don't believe every major tragedy is a conspiracy, that automatically means I believe everything the main stream news reports?

How'd you make that connection?
 
the worst guys are people who look down on anyone asking legitimate questions as "a conspiracy nutjob"

obviously, there are crazy guys going waaaay overboard, but save your "its so disrespectful to the victims"-fake compassion for another thread.
 
I like the way that according to the conspiracy theorists with his twitter/facebook, somehow he had the time recently to be on those accounts, and also decided to make his profile picture the same ones the news programs are using.
 
Hear me out on this one...

The US government is trying to end the Gun debate in Washington. They don't want change in gun laws so they stage a Boston Marathon Bombing with two dark skinned males and blow up a fertilizer plant in Texas. Now they will discuss bomb control and pass a law in the next month. Gun Control out of sight out of mind move on and avoid the gun debate.

just a thought.
 
No, I look down on anyone that believes everything they read on the internet regardless of how much evidence points to the contrary. You are no different than the sheep that believe everything on Fox or CNN.

It's one thing to ask questions, it's a whole different situation to continuously ask the same questions, coming to ridiculous conclusions based on zero evidence and brushing off the answers to your questions as planted evidence by the government/illuminati/corporations.
 
No shit... Probably 100 non domestic mirders today by the US but people are focusing on the domestic attack that most likely wasn't done by the govt.

Why not focus on shit you can actually prove?
 
i know your a big on that independent opinion thing, but seriously, where should i get my information from?

should i fly to boston now and interview victims and people in watertown?

i have to rely on (mainstream) media, but the internet is a huge pool of (all levels of) information. and mainstream outlets have a too bad a name when it comes to the original information they portray. they just present it in a way fitting to their political agendas. its like a guy, everyone knows such a guy, who wont make shit up, but overestimates all his facts in stories (like he dropped a 40ft cliff instead of a 20footer ....). if you know what that agenda is and you "filter" the information a little bit, you have little problem knowing whats up.

tbh, i obviously cant watch american news outlets too much, i just know that FOX has all that right-wing labels attached to it and that, for example, MSNBC is more on the "other" side. but my point is very general, since all countries and their respective political sides have "their" media companies.
 
And this is the level of intelligence required to be a conspiracy nut. You have to be the kind of kid who thinks there are only two places to get information; major news outlets like MSNBC and Fox or internet forums like infowars...
 
then tell me where you get "your" information from, all you do is criticize others. show us how we can be enlightened by our allmighty savior skiierman
 
people need to think for themselves and not just blindly accept whatever the fbi, 4chan, infowars, cnn, fox, or msnbc say. eye witness reports and empirical evidence > weak ass "jump to conclusion" reporting from both sides of the spectrum.

although i think the younger brother was brainwashed/pressured into this shit by the older one, he still went along with the act and broke a couple laws along the way (sarcasm)

if this in fact a conspiracy (rofl), you would 9000-10000 cops and countless eye witnesses to turn a blind eye...not seeing it (pun intended). yeah, the city went into "marital law" and cops were searching without warrants, but how else do you go about it given the circumstances?
 
and the fact that complete bullshit forensic "skills" were used by 4chan that were ultimately used by infowars (yes, batshit crazy alex jones ran with it) and other news outlets.
 
you say that as though Anonymous hasn't tracked down and punished people from incriminating photos before.
 
so where were the "actual" bombers in all the photos and videos pre bomb? i have only seen them in in the sanctioned fbi footage.
 
Nahhh man you don't get it. They were brainwashed and forced to bring those bombs there and then shoot at police while throwing more explosives at them... yup... actors... fucking actors.
 
Oh really? That's strange because there's plenty of video showing that scumbag kid dropping his bag off and the bomb going off moments after...

well I guess that's nothing compared to the evidence that conspiracy nuts have. A zoomed in look at an unidentified, kind of torn up backpack with no key as to where/when the picture is taken and going on that it sort of, kind of, looks like the same backpack someone else was carrying... all the while accusing a security officer that's part of a group that is hired to work security AT EVERY IMPORTANT EVENT IN THE U.S.
 
A girl who was going to become a professional dancer got both her legs blown off by these bombs. It's like if Willie Borm was there and bam, next thing he knows he's never skiing again. I think we'll hear about a lot of suicides from the victims of the bombing. I believe all these events justs happened to collide, including this bullshit anonymous "CISPA"

Fuck theories, they're not true until proven! Think about the fucking people getting their legs blown off before you say "the government did it, yeah of course they did, because they want to use their healthcare money and all that on these people, maybe costing them millions for all the victims, of course they want that to happen"
 
Hey bro, I have proof this guy works for a company because he is wearing a hat anyone can buy on their website for $22.95.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top