Lenses for Canon 7d

R

RedNas

New member
I'm buying a Canon 7d in the near future, but I have no idea which lenses to get.

I need one "standard" lens and a fisheye or wide-angle lens.

I'll be filming mostly action sports like skiing, snowboarding, skating and BMX, but might do some "normal" filming too.

Would really appreciate it if some of you could give some advice on which lenses to buy, and if I should get ether a fisheye or a wide angle.
 
Personal recommendations

Canon 24-105 4L IS USM -----Standard

Tamron 17-50 2.8 Non-VC ---Standard

Canon 17-40 4L USM --------Wide

Tokina 11-16 2.8 -----------Wide

 
well if you want a fisheye, pick up a rokina 8mm for under $300 new. Full manual so there isn't any auto focus, but its a fisheye so that really shouldn't matter, other then that, evan and jamie both listed solid recommendations
 
thanks guys, I'll check'em out!

But what would you recommend for my use, a fisheye or a wide angle lens?
 
Anyone know any lenses similar to the Tokina 11-16 but more in the $350-$500 price range rather than $600?
 
no to this fisheye recommendation. your camera is only as good as the glass you put on it. if you want a fisheye buy a tokina 10-17mm f/3.5-4.5, very solid fisheye, its gonna run you up probably close to double the price of the rokinon but i can guarantee the glass quality is a hell of a lot better.
 
the tokina is most definitely not a fisheye, especially not on a crop sensor camera like the 7d. it's an amazzzzzzing lens though, hoping to cop it soon
 
you are the second person on this site to tell me this lens is not a fisheye. ITS A FISHEYE, EVERY REVIEW CALLS IT A FISHEYE, WHEN I LOOK THROUGH SAID LENS WHEN IT'S MOUNTED ON MY CAMERA THE FISHEYE EFFECT IS VISIBLY NOTICEABLE. look at every fisheyed photo on my flickr, ALL WERE TAKEN WITH THIS LENS.

this picture was taken with TOKINA 10-17 f/3.5-4.5 on a rebel XSi, a camera with the same crop sensor as a 7D (1.6x). are you seriously going to tell me this was not taken with a fisheye lens?

4913865380_828ce473ea_z.jpg


still don't believe me? here is a list of websites talking about this FISHEYE LENS.

http://www.photozone.de/nikon--nikkor-aps-c-lens-tests/271-tokina-af-10-17mm-f35-45-at-x-dx-fisheye-review--test-report

http://www.kenrockwell.com/tokina/10-17mm.htm

http://www.tokinalens.com/products/tokina/atx107afdx-a.html

http://www.dphotojournal.com/tokina-10-17mm-f35-45-fish-eye-reviews-sample-photos/

but you're probably right, its not a fisheye, i've just been using this lens for over a year and know absolutely NOTHING about it.
 
it's a great outdoor lens. for low light portraits i use a 50mm 1.8 but yeah, the 24-105 is incredibly sharp and nice, fantastic lens. the 10-22 spends the most time on my camera though. i upgraded from a sigma 10-20 and it's just amazing. so so so fun. i love UWA lenses
 
sorry i just cant stand people telling me the fisheye lens i own and frequently use is not a fisheye. kind of annoying ya dig?
 
canon 15mm f2.8 fisheye, very sharp and reasonably wide on a crop body.
canon 24-70 f2.8L, great all around lens, weather resistant, very sharp, and reasonably inexpensive if you find it used.
zeiss 50mm f1.4, no explination needed. especially for video.
canon 70-200 f/whatever you can afford, mandatory in any serious collection.
 
You can't really get a good super-wide for cheaper than the tokina. It performs about as good as you are going to get without sacrificing quality, as super-wides aren't easy to make.

I agree with the rokinon suggestion. It's a wonderful little fisheye. I've played with it, and it performs really really well for being worth 300$ brand new. It's really sharp, doesn't have much in the way of CA - so little it will probably not even be noticeable when you are filming. It's just one of those lucky mistakes.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top