Karma's or Motherships

[MHanraha]

I'm looking to get into the glades, and well possibly the park, but more focus on off trail. Right now I'm on line fx7.3 titaniums. I'm basically looking for something to start out with more flex and more float. I've heard the karma's are pretty stiff though, so I was thinking maybe the line mothership flites. Any thoughts?

 

[Huckasorass]

There is lots of other options for you, but since you asked, Karmas are stiff, and the flites are nice and flexy. i have some moship flites 172 on ebay right now and 2 pairs of karma 177's to sell, I used the karmas in the trees last year and love them (even tho they're stiff, the flex pattern rocks.)

oh, and they ski a bit short

 

[lpskier5]

go with the karma, youll love it all mtn

 

[FUUUCK]

go with the cheaper one

 

[Paul-o-Rama]

Karma

 

[Tinga]

karmas

 

[Cheeseninja]

Those skis are really, really different.

To begin:

The Karmas are stiff

The Mo-Ships are soft.

 

[skoganskier101]

moships are fatter.karma's are stiffer and narrower,i think karma's would hold up better than moships

 

[MHanraha]

So my question is basically which would be a better ski to start out with,and huckasorass could you pm me a link to those skis.

 

[hiphopopotamus]

karmas are sweet but the motherships are like candy

 

[skidemon22]

karmas hands down.

 

[$1080PLP$]

siffers skis are going to a bit harder to handle for vs a softer ski. i love my moship Ti's (alot stiffer then the flights) but if i was starting out i would much rather have a softer ski, also you you love the fattyness of the moships.

 

[awsomecoolguy]

i really dont know what i would get thats a pretty even match up if you ask me get witchever one is cheeper