K2 OR SALOMON

hondarider5474 · Dec 1, 2005

K2 OR SALOMON

strongmark · Dec 1, 2005

fuck you

eheath · Dec 1, 2005

NEITHER

squibble · Dec 1, 2005

do you even have to ask

CBROOKS · Dec 1, 2005

k2 hands down.

TylerGigg · Dec 1, 2005

Both are good and can prove there records by the pure volume of skis each of them have sold over the years. I personally have skied salomons since I was 12 and have thought they have been sick ever since.

^NewYork · Dec 1, 2005

k2 has a good team and makes good skis

salomon has a shitty team and makes shitty skis. you figure it out

FUUUCK · Dec 1, 2005

^uh salomon has arguably the best team going

k2 definately though, in terms of marketing product and a solid team

Matty. · Dec 1, 2005

Salomon has a sick team...but it is agreeable that they make shitty skis...but I haven't ridden them enough to have a true opinion...so I'm neutral.

Revert · Dec 1, 2005

Cr, Gagnier, Olenick, Dumont, you'd probably lick all their balls if you were within 3 feet of any of them.

PEJibber31 · Dec 1, 2005

ABMA... Why is it that guy always gets left out... Nevertheless, k2 makes much better skis

ItsPhil · Dec 1, 2005

samsonite carlson

Kevo · Dec 1, 2005

K2/Volkl over Salomon anyday

Kevo · Dec 1, 2005

except for boots. I love Salomon boots.

Marg · Dec 2, 2005

i was gunna say K2 until I read this I totally agree with you I'm glad you put the time in to write that

^NewYork · Dec 2, 2005

ok fine there team is good but thier skis bring the team down. k2 has a much better team though

ZavierV · Dec 2, 2005

k2. hands up!

cLyOnS_45 · Dec 2, 2005

4frnt hands up.

rynmartn · Dec 2, 2005

salomon all the way. almost all ppl who hate on them have never skied them. they just follow the trends so as not to be left out

Schoening · Dec 2, 2005

k2 by a long shot

r.w · Dec 2, 2005

hey fuck tard! salomon has the best team going.....buit then you go and reverse what you said dumass! but k2 is better casue of the skis and there solid team!!??

telestar6 · Dec 2, 2005

K2. I gave Salomon a chance last season and delaminate a pair of Pocket Rockets 20 days into the season. And the worst part about it is that they wouldn't warranty them. I hate Salomon now and won't ever buy from them again.

Gez · Dec 2, 2005

k2 no doubt

pbandj · Dec 2, 2005

neither, but k2 over salomon

grubix2 · Dec 2, 2005

I don't understand why everyone is up Salomons ass. Bindings aren't very good, but the skis rock. YES k2 makes a more durable ski, but the 1080 (not to mention their whole new line of skis this year) is such an awesome ski. I had a chance to demo 1080's 3 times and loved the ski every second. It might be one of the best skis for lighter riders and/or guys who aren't doing 50+ ft. hits all the time.

Go ahead jump on the foam core, but when it comes down to it, you'll find that 1080's have one of the highest sales rates. And thats for a good reason. Ride it before you bash it.

garrett. · Dec 2, 2005

ARMADA

PirateManSkier · Dec 2, 2005

k2 for sure bro.

MarkieR · Dec 2, 2005

guys the foam core rocks. i don't know what the deal is with all you kids hating on it. wood core is great, but foam core is so much lighter. people just hate on a company for some reason, and then they won't ever even consider that company for the rest of your life. even if they make the best product money can buy. i don't get it.

skia4life89 · Dec 2, 2005

dude, they are both great companies, k2 is the best hands down, but everyone who says salomon skis and bindings are terrible have never ridin them and are just going by what all the other fags on here say. i have ridin the foils and thrusters with 912s on them and i loved them, but i went with the k2 public enemy, cuz of some deal i have with k2 :}!

dan1080 · Dec 2, 2005

i had 03 04 salomon 1080s with s810ti bindings and both got fucked on me...the bindings exploded and the actual titanium plate snapped in half and my skis delamned so im hardpressed to ever go back to riding salomons again..however i have to say the 1080s were a sick ski and served me reall good

Krongos · Dec 2, 2005

foam core is lame because i weight more than 50 pounds. Salomon sucks, i say go for k2 if you are gonna get an old company but support armada, 4frnt and line first

SiverCartel · Dec 2, 2005

dynastar

Lillero · Dec 2, 2005

This is stupid question... K2 OF COURSE!

JAYTRON · Dec 2, 2005

^ i agree. now that they dont have candide though im saying k2

1FastSTI · Dec 2, 2005

this year salomon havnt forgotten about the pure park ski, they made all there skis this year to make an all around ski, there loosin there park points and goin for all mountain, i think k2 has a huge advantage on them now,k2 strickly has skis for what u want and most are nice park skis.

DarksidexXx · Dec 2, 2005

Company wise idk about k2 any more, check out every oneof their new skis.... they are all made in china, Salomons are all still made in france, rossi in spain/france, volkls in germany.. so why does k2 have to make their skis in china? thats kinda wack if you ask me.

Salomons team is sick... and so are the skis that their team skis on... oh yeah and wood next year?

im supprised i havent seem more on here about this but suppositively sollys going wood?

Any one kno anything else?

B-DOG45 · Dec 2, 2005

salomon just for all mountain

skidemon22 · Dec 2, 2005

what the fuucckk are you talking about. Salomon has a much better team than K2. the only decent person from k2 that illl give you is fujas. salomon has CR, Mike Douuglas, Sammy Carlson. Mark adma and Simon Dumont to name a few. and their skis are actually pretty good. in my opinoin i obviously so with salomon.

FUUUCK · Dec 2, 2005

are fucking serious, get off this site you have nothing to contribute to this thread, you criticism is in no way constructive. just go way

crazkid479 · Dec 2, 2005

BennyB · Dec 2, 2005

BigJew · Dec 2, 2005

FUUUCK · Dec 2, 2005

what about seth morrison andy mahre josh bibby and rory silva etc... arent they at least decent???

Anathema · Dec 2, 2005

depends. what are the circumstances? you're proposing an overly ambiguous question here.

yojimbo · Dec 2, 2005

K2 mother fucker!

grubix2 · Dec 2, 2005

why because those companies are more "core"? Line is he only company out of those I'd consider buying. Armada and 4frnt are so damn expensive for a ski that is equal or sub par to others. Yes those companies, are newschool specific, but why would i limit myself? I can buy rossi or K2 much cheaper than I can 4frnt. Do I feel bad buying from a company that is less "core"? No. Am I a better freeskier because I rock STL's instead of Fugis? Hell No.

Buy what you like, and whats good for you. At the end of the day, you can still do an underflip whether it's on T-hall pros, or scratch FS's.

FUUUCK · Dec 2, 2005

^for god sakes its FUJATIVE not "FUJIS"!!!!

Scoszko · Dec 2, 2005

you should go with the cross country skis

skia4life89 · Dec 2, 2005

K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2

K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2

K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2

K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2

K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2

K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2

K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2

K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2

K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2

K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2

K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2

K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2

K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2

K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2

K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2

K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2

K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2

K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2

K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2

K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2

K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2

K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2

K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2

K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2

K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2

K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2

K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2

K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2

K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2

K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2

K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2

K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2

K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2

K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2

K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2

K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2

K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2

K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2

K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2

K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2

K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2

K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2

K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2

K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2

K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2

K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2

K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2

K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2K2

grubix2 · Dec 2, 2005

Salomon probably has the best competition team out there. Not that other teams aren't awesome, but salomon is so consistant. Not to mention CR is fucking sweet. So glad he won icer.

=nick= · Dec 2, 2005

haha so true.

K2 OR SALOMON

New member

Active member

Active member

Active member

Active member

Member

Active member

Active member

Active member

Member

Member

Active member

Active member

Active member

Active member

Active member

Active member

Active member

Active member

Active member

Active member

Active member

Member

Active member

Active member

Active member

Member

Active member

Active member

Active member

Active member

Member

Member

Active member

Member

Member

Active member

Active member

Active member

Member

Active member

Active member

Active member

Active member

Active member

Active member

Active member

Member

Active member

Active member

Active member