K2 marksman mount point

skrrtskrrt

Member
i’ve got a fresh pair of K2 Marksmans that are 163 cm and I just bought some marker griffons to go with it but I’m not sure where I should mount them can anyone give ideas? I am light weight and only 5’4
 
I have that same setup and had mine about 2.5 back, but got them remounted almost to the suggested point, so like 6 back, and like them a lot more this way. I'm not too much of a park guy though and spend the vast majority of my time going forward. They got noticably more maneuverable mounted further back. Held a better edge, charged crud harder, just generally felt more stable. Also my favorite pair of skis I've ever ridden.
 
I just got that same setup but I’m thinking of center mount because I ski park most of the time but I also want to ski deeper snow when I’m at different places
 
also i forgot to mention, i ski big jumps, trees, some pow, crud, and groomers. i refuse to hit rails on brand new skis
 
14161342:sickjukes87 said:
I just got that same setup but I’m thinking of center mount because I ski park most of the time but I also want to ski deeper snow when I’m at different places

NOOOO dont center mount em, go like 3 or 3.5 cms back so you can enjoy some soft snow performance while also being able to have some freestyle elements too
 
If you use the search bar there’s a couple threads on this and iirc most people got -3 or -4?

I got mine -3 as a one ski quiver, I wish I could ride more deep snow with them cause they charge hard. But 90% of my days are in the park and I really like them there too
 
so like -4 would be good? i want to get better at switch but mostly like sending side hits and natural features. i do want to get 360s and backflips down tho
 
I got a pair of 163s as well and I have them -2.5 from center. Beat mounting point out there period.

14161399:skrrtskrrt said:
so like -4 would be good? i want to get better at switch but mostly like sending side hits and natural features. i do want to get 360s and backflips down tho
 
14161374:CalumSKI said:
NOOOO dont center mount em, go like 3 or 3.5 cms back so you can enjoy some soft snow performance while also being able to have some freestyle elements too

I was thinking of mounting at -1 cm if not center because I am working on front swaps and getting better at rail tricks
 
14161419:sickjukes87 said:
I was thinking of mounting at -1 cm if not center because I am working on front swaps and getting better at rail tricks

I mean that's alright, but I dont think the marksmans are the greatest ski to mount that far forward bro

Sleep on it and think about it

But either way u will love the skis, they are super dope!!!
 
14161423:CalumSKI said:
I mean that's alright, but I dont think the marksmans are the greatest ski to mount that far forward bro

Sleep on it and think about it

But either way u will love the skis, they are super dope!!!

Ok thanks
 
14161399:skrrtskrrt said:
so like -4 would be good? i want to get better at switch but mostly like sending side hits and natural features. i do want to get 360s and backflips down tho

If you're worried -4 might be too far back then go with -3. Thats what my thinking was, its enough center for park and still back enough for all mountain
 
14161419:sickjukes87 said:
I was thinking of mounting at -1 cm if not center because I am working on front swaps and getting better at rail tricks

You bought the wrong ski for that. Lotta skis around for $300 rn , consider buying a park ski For rails, but if your not doing rails mount at rec and carve, spin and flip away. Most of my skis are -6 to -9 and give me no trouble for carving switch, spins, or switch Takeoffs , or landing.
 
If i were you, and you're struggling with a mount position, I would use the recommended mount point that is on the skis. The engineers at K2 put that there for a reason with tons of testing and reasoning for it. Unless you're going for a different mount point for something particular, for example center mount or using -2 cm from center like I usually do I would use the recommended. Trust me when I say this, we don't just put that mount point line there for good looks. It has a purpose.
 
so im thinking like -5 or -6? or should i really put it on traditional. I’m going to be skiing a lot more groomers and trees than pow in michigan

**This post was edited on Aug 5th 2020 at 2:07:55pm
 
14161594:skrrtskrrt said:
so im thinking like -5 or -6? or should i really put it on traditional. I’m going to be skiing a lot more groomers and trees than pow in michigan

**This post was edited on Aug 5th 2020 at 2:07:55pm

Just go traditional.
 
14161590:bradwalters said:
If i were you, and you're struggling with a mount position, I would use the recommended mount point that is on the skis. The engineers at K2 put that there for a reason with tons of testing and reasoning for it. Unless you're going for a different mount point for something particular, for example center mount or using -2 cm from center like I usually do I would use the recommended. Trust me when I say this, we don't just put that mount point line there for good looks. It has a purpose.

The recommend point on loads of skis are stupid far back tho. An arv96 has a recommended point of like -4 or sum, for example. I'd day just mount em at like -2.5 and give'r

**This post was edited on Aug 5th 2020 at 4:15:26pm
 
Back
Top