K2 makes BIG SKIS

[TannerBalls]

k2 skis are bigger than other skis, my 180 candides are smaller than 179 PE by 3 inches!!

A 100 PERCENT CHANCE OF SNOW SHOWERS... HEAVY SNOW ACCUMULATIONS POSSIBLE. HIGHS IN THE LOWER 30S.

 

[CalgaryJibber]

CONGRATULATIONS! thats sooo sick dogg what an effective use of NS space- join my club man you tha man

stop it with the fuckin gay posts!! GNARLAY!

XXXX-Lego Maniac-XXXX

 

[mikee]

I think a 159 K2 ski will actually be 163 and therefore a 179 will be 183 or whatever.

-Michael Lifshitz-

 

[TannerBalls]

yeah somthin like that

A 100 PERCENT CHANCE OF SNOW SHOWERS... HEAVY SNOW ACCUMULATIONS POSSIBLE. HIGHS IN THE LOWER 30S.

 

[SkiFree_MT]

this thread is a big waste of space moron

 

[Roussel]

fuck it, lets waste the space, what has NS done for us lately anyways? nothign! THE'VE DONE NOTHIGN!

-----------

The Roussel

 

[3ski6guy0]

how do i say this nicely. PLEASE SHUT THE FUCK UP MAN

********* ********* *********

LAND SHARK!!! EEEEE EEEEEE EEEEEEE

 

[mikee]

Actually its not, we are discussing a fucking weird system of measuring skis that k2 has. So do you think that the ski si just measured without te tail or something?

-Michael Lifshitz-

 

[TannerBalls]

I don't think that was nice---a nice way would have been...please stop posting this moronic poopy!

A 100 PERCENT CHANCE OF SNOW SHOWERS... HEAVY SNOW ACCUMULATIONS POSSIBLE. HIGHS IN THE LOWER 30S.

 

[CalgaryJibber]

actually it is its prolly just the runing length of the ski on the k2's and the tip to tial baselength on the dynastars- if your wanna know get a tape measurer out

XXXX-Lego Maniac-XXXX

 

[mammothpunks]

the big kahunas are real skis. None of your pussy small skis can compare

'I should put my camera on a tripod - its easier to drink beer that way' - dirty steve

NS royal gangstar

 

[ottoponto]

so what's 'running lenght' ?

 

[Nix]

does this guy EVER post worthwhile threads?

who u think u foolin', FOO?

 

[Insomniac]

i think running length is how the ski messures without the tip and the tail. the tip might actually be in running length, but without ne k2 skis i cant tell. running lenght is how much of the ski is on the snow. but i dont know if they count the tip in that. and k2 should just messure shit the right way

_________________________________________________________________________________ The above comment is the views and opinions of I, Craige Diaz and I hereby accept no responibility for them.

NewSchoolSnow

 

[Powderdayz]

kaHunaS r bEastlY

'crooks is bad at life......' -maier

 

[KZA]

they measure only whats on the ground, so like not tail or tip

 

[mark311]

yeah, some companies actually measure tip to tail, while others just measure running length, which is what part of the ski is on the ground.