Just got new skis... ON3P!

TWoods

TWoods

Active member
Staff member
1222842365-634328-600x902-122284228.jpg
1222842502-634329-600x902-122284221.jpg
1222842524-634330-600x902-122284217.jpg
1222842540-634331-600x902-122284214.jpg
1222842557-634332-600x902-122284210.jpg
1222842578-634333-600x902-122284205.jpg


Basically, the sickest skis ever.

185. 115 underfoot, 25/25 rocker in the tip and tail, almost symmetrical, soft. amazing graphics done by newschooler's own "freezed" (matty geronimo)

sooo ill
 
oh shit, i should have said

for those of you that don't know, OBVIOUSLY, the skis are made by the mod "iggyskier"

PM him and let him know how badass he is
 
I've been awake for 30 hours at this point, leave me alone!!! haha

um there will be more ON3Ps in teh future, these are prototypes!
 
I just got my Caylors a few days ago.

They dwarf the rest of my quiver:

1222895730-634504-600x450-1222895544IMGA0102.JPG


1222895812-634505-600x450-1222895656IMGA0101.JPG


Tip rocker 35 cm x 1.5 cm

1222895865-634506-600x450-1222895714IMGA0104.JPG


Mad props to Scott (Iggyskier) and everyone who helped him out!!
 
Caylor Rocker is 35cm x 2.5cm.

Jeronimo is 25cm x 2cm.

They both come out with a little bit less than that, and just a tiny bit of chamber underfoot to give them a bit more pop, because of how I heat them during pressing.

 
OMFG ON3Ps!!!! WTFBBQ

I'm getting mine mounted as soon as the bindings I eventually settled on for them show up. I
 
Those are so dope, they don't look almost symmetrical in the picture though, the tip looks way bigger than the tail. Graphics are so sick too.
 
That bottom picture is definitely deceiving

Jeronimos are 186cm, 145/115/142. They are I set them up in the mold, there is a little more tip than tail. also, the tip has a slightly rounder tip shape.

Here is most of my skis so you can get a perspective of the different shapes. This only shows 5 of the 7 models people are testing, excluding the 2 customs I made.

on3pskis059-1.jpg

 
So stoked to see that everything is coming together with scott and ON3P - can't wait for some testing to go down this season!
 
Figured I may as well add why that is.

The tail shape of most of the twins I have been making slightly narrower so that in tight situation it allows you to throw your skis are a bit easy with less hookiness.

On a ski like the one above, it really isn't entirely important, as it is a more turny, less directional ski.

But on something like the great scott (yes I am modest), where it is a directional pow ski most, the twin gets even narrower so that, while not losing the ability to carve and hold the fall line, if you need to quickly slash the tail of the ski out, you can easily do so.

You can see this in the tail shape of the GS.

on3pskis050-1.jpg


 
in my pictures it's because I am using a wide-angle lens that distorts the image.
 
well figured I would add that it there is a slightly more narrow tail in ever ski but the caylor and blue steele for the reason I listed.
 
Those are pretty much the dopest skis I've seen. Props on doing your own thing and making your own skis.
 
oh my god, those are so sick. mad props to iggyskier. i hope this goes places. hopefully i can get my hands on some one day. good luck scott
 
Caylors are 191cm 147/121/144 and named after the legend. how can you go from with a ski named after sam caylor??
 
I went with the sentimental choice: original Scratch 140s, the orange ones with the girls on the heelpieces. They were my first serious twintip ski bindings. They're shipping to me from a dude on TGR.
 
Basically the sickest skis I've ever owned. Every shop goes ga-ga over them. Bamboo cores, sickest topsheets ever, stiff but bouncy... just a thing of pure beauty.
 
I got some almost brand new axials from teh thrift shop for 15 dolla no big deal

I'm on hour 37!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top