Capernicus
Member
jon should have got first! his run was so much more technically demanding than tanners
After tanners low, first run score he said to the anchor 'its weird I didn't crash that run and I still got a lower score that when I crashed in my preliminary run' The judges had to have heard it and been a little bit bias in the rest of their judging
Tanner didn't even go unatural in his run, I haven't even seen him spin more than and untaural 180! both jon and simon were doing sweet unatural 5s in their runs
We talked to Chris Turpin afterwords and he agreed that jon should have won
Charles Gangae also got ripped! he spun switch rodeos both ways and did a switch backside 7 then a switch fronstide cork nine
the judges need quit being bias and start judging fairly
1st Jon 2nd Peter 3rd tanner
After tanners low, first run score he said to the anchor 'its weird I didn't crash that run and I still got a lower score that when I crashed in my preliminary run' The judges had to have heard it and been a little bit bias in the rest of their judging
Tanner didn't even go unatural in his run, I haven't even seen him spin more than and untaural 180! both jon and simon were doing sweet unatural 5s in their runs
We talked to Chris Turpin afterwords and he agreed that jon should have won
Charles Gangae also got ripped! he spun switch rodeos both ways and did a switch backside 7 then a switch fronstide cork nine
the judges need quit being bias and start judging fairly
1st Jon 2nd Peter 3rd tanner