zac, thats stupid
Well, ok, you're entitled to your opinion and I respect it. I'm saying is that there are over 2000 reports saying close to the same thing all produced within 50-100 years of Jesus's death and resurection. Now, maybe I'm wrong, but when 2000 people witness a man being nailed to a cross and see that he's quite completely dead, stuck in his side with a spear and buried, then 3 days later see the same man walking the earth, alive as you or me with his wounds stil visible, it's kind of hard to attribute it to slieght of hand. By historian's standards, that is irrefutable proof that Jesus was and still is what the Bible said he is.
				
			Well, ok, you're entitled to your opinion and I respect it. I'm saying is that there are over 2000 reports saying close to the same thing all produced within 50-100 years of Jesus's death and resurection. Now, maybe I'm wrong, but when 2000 people witness a man being nailed to a cross and see that he's quite completely dead, stuck in his side with a spear and buried, then 3 days later see the same man walking the earth, alive as you or me with his wounds stil visible, it's kind of hard to attribute it to slieght of hand. By historian's standards, that is irrefutable proof that Jesus was and still is what the Bible said he is.