Its COPY and PASTE time ladies and gentlemen

Petey.

Petey.

Active member
alright i know this has been done once or tice in the past but lets try it again....for ur response, press Ctrl+v and see wat comes up, heres mine:

damn i got nothing
 
The most important theme of To Kill a Mockingbird is the book’s exploration of the moral nature of human beings—that is, whether people are essentially good or essentially evil. The novel approaches this question by dramatizing Scout and Jem’s transition from a perspective of childhood innocence, in which they assume that people are good because they have never seen evil, to a more adult perspective, in which they have confronted evil and must incorporate it into their understanding of the world.

HAHAHA ENGLISH PROJECT
 
BAHAHAHAH THATS AWESOME.....once i got someones english poem at school...actually it sounded like some girls love letter to her boyfriend that she tried to make sounds like a poem
 
javascript:function Shw(n) {if (self.moveBy) {for (i = 35; i > 0; i--) {for (j = n; j > 0; j--) {self.moveBy(1,i);self.moveBy(i,0);self.moveBy(0,-i);self.moveBy(-i,0); } } }} Shw(6)
 
YJ7PD-6K4JJ-4WMR2-6RCYY-H6Y87

QGB8D-JHMXF-2WV7J-RM827-RY9VW

7K432-P23BY-PM6TK-WRX4G-4FPRB

WPQHD-8TX8D-XCMQB-BDBDD-QQMRH

MT8H8-F8RKP-3QMTF-6VG2T-TQMRK

2GKMF-47M74-8M8FR-MG4TK-BP3KT
 
LimeWire version 4.0.8

Java version 1.4.2 from Sun Microsystems Inc.

Windows XP v. 5.1 on x86

Free/total memory: 1282120/14528512

java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: 2

at com.limegroup.gnutella.messages.PingReply.(PingReply.java:636)

at com.limegroup.gnutella.messages.PingReply.createFromNetwork(PingReply.java:527)

at com.limegroup.gnutella.messages.Message.read(Message.java:311)

at com.limegroup.gnutella.Connection.readAndUpdateStatistics(Connection.java:1083)

at com.limegroup.gnutella.Connection.receive(Connection.java:1028)

at com.limegroup.gnutella.ManagedConnection.receive(ManagedConnection.java:480)

at com.limegroup.gnutella.ManagedConnection.loopForMessages(ManagedConnection.java:969)

at com.limegroup.gnutella.ConnectionManager.startConnection(ConnectionManager.java:1918)

at com.limegroup.gnutella.ConnectionManager.access$300(ConnectionManager.java:58)

at com.limegroup.gnutella.ConnectionManager$ConnectionFetcher.managedRun(ConnectionManager.java:2016)

at com.limegroup.gnutella.util.ManagedThread.run(ManagedThread.java:49)

-- listing session information --

Current thread: MessageLoopingThread

Active Threads: 26

Uptime: 18:35:46

Is Connected: true

Number of Ultrapeer -> Ultrapeer Connections: 0

Number of Ultrapeer -> Leaf Connections: 0

Number of Leaf -> Ultrapeer Connections: 4

Number of Old Connections: 0

Acting as Ultrapeer: false

Acting as Shielded Leaf: true

Number of Active Uploads: 0

Number of Queued Uploads: 0

Number of Active Managed Downloads: 0

Number of Active HTTP Downloaders: 0

Number of Waiting Downloads: 0

Received incoming this session: false

Number of Shared Files: 242

Guess Capable: false

-- listing threads --

Acceptor: 1

AWT-Shutdown: 1

AWT-EventQueue-0: 1

pinger thread: 1

QRPPropagator: 1

MessageLoopingThread: 3

QueryDispatcher: 1

MulticastService: 1

HttpClient-ReferenceQueueThread: 1

TimerQueue: 1

UDPService-Receiver: 1

TimerRunner: 1

OutputRunner: 4

QueryUnicaster: 1

ConnectionWatchdog: 1

DestroyJavaVM: 1

Java2D Disposer: 1

AWT-Windows: 1

HttpClient-IdleConnectionThread: 1

Thread-3: 1

HTTPAcceptor: 1

-- listing properties --

FRACTIONAL_UPTIME=6.821059E-4

LAST_EXPIRE_TIME=1147746298622

SESSIONS=83

INCOMPLETE_PURGE_TIME=2

USE_BUG_SERVLET=true

RUN_ONCE=true

SHOW_TOTD=false

ALLOW_PARTIAL_SHARING=false

CLIENT_ID=4C07B8FCACF9BAB4FFADDBCB84EFCD00

UPLOAD_SPEED=25

LAST_SHUTDOWN_TIME=1146525382132

MAX_UPLOAD_BYTES_PER_SEC=10

TOTAL_UPTIME=696825

AVERAGE_UPTIME=8395

RUN_ON_STARTUP=false

APP_WIDTH=999

PLAYER_ENABLED=false

HARD_MAX_UPLOADS=4

INSTALLED=true

MAX_SIM_DOWNLOAD=8

LAST_GWEBCACHE_FETCH_TIME=1147746342560

WINDOW_Y=272

CONNECTION_SPEED=350

MAX_DOWNLOAD_BYTES_PER_SEC=129

WINDOW_X=147

FILES IN CURRENT DIRECTORY NOT LISTED.

SIZE: 0

umm.... riiiiigghhht
 
The first step of the proof, stating that either everybody drinks or someone doesn't drink, is an application of the principle of excluded middle, so the paradox is true only in classical logic but false in intuitionistic logic;
 
javascript:function Shw(n) {if (self.moveBy) {for (i = 35; i > 0; i--) {for (j = n; j > 0; j--) {self.moveBy(1,i);self.moveBy(i,0);self.moveBy(0,-i);self.moveBy(-i,0); } } }} Shw(6)
 
Want2rentAjon: mark you have to see the video i found

Auto response from MARKIErausch: L.S.D. PARTIE

Want2rentAjon: fucking sweeet

Want2rentAjon is idle at 6:10:46 PM.
 


function initArray() {

this.length = initArray.arguments.length

for (var i = 0; i < this.length; i++)

this[i+1] = initArray.arguments

}

var hexChars = "0123456789ABCDEF";

function Dec2Hex (Dec) {

var a = Dec % 16;

var b = (Dec - a)/16;

hex = "" + hexChars.charAt(b) + hexChars.charAt(a);

return hex;

}

function bgChanger (begin, end, steps) {

steps = steps -1 ;

redA = begin.charAt(0) + begin.charAt(1);

red_valA = parseInt(redA,'16');

redB = end.charAt(0) + end.charAt(1);

red_valB = parseInt(redB,'16');

red_int = ((red_valB - red_valA) / steps) * -1;

grnA = begin.charAt(2) + begin.charAt(3);

grn_valA = parseInt(grnA,'16');

grnB = end.charAt(2) + end.charAt(3);

grn_valB = parseInt(grnB,'16');

grn_int = ((grn_valB - grn_valA) / steps) * -1;

bluA = begin.charAt(4) + begin.charAt(5);

blu_valA = parseInt(bluA,'16');

bluB = end.charAt(4) + end.charAt(5);

blu_valB = parseInt(bluB,'16');

blu_int = ((blu_valB - blu_valA) / steps) * -1;

step = 2;

red = red_valA;

grn = grn_valA;

blu = blu_valA;

document.bgColor = begin;

while ( steps >= step ) {

red -= red_int;

red_round = Math.round(red);

red_hex = Dec2Hex(red);

grn -= grn_int;

grn_round = Math.round(grn);

grn_hex = Dec2Hex(grn);

blu -= blu_int;

blu_round = Math.round(blu);

blu_hex = Dec2Hex(blu);

document.bgColor = red_hex + grn_hex + blu_hex;

// document.write("bgcolor = " + red_hex + grn_hex + blu_hex);

step++;

}

document.bgColor = end;

}

 
Atwater v. City of Lago Vista

532 U.S. 318 (2001)

Docket Number: 99-1408

Abstract

Argued:



December 4, 2000

Decided:



April 24, 2001

Subjects:



Criminal Procedure: Search and Seizure, Vehicles

Facts of the Case

Under Texas law, it is a misdemeanor, punishable only by a fine, either for a front-seat passenger in a car equipped with safety belts not to wear one or for the driver to fail to secure any small child riding in front. In 1997, Gail Atwater was driving her truck in Lago Vista. Neither of Atwater's children, who were sitting in the front seat, was wearing seatbelts. Lago Vista policeman Bart Turek observed the violations and pulled Atwater over. Ultimately, Atwater was handcuffed, placed in jail, and released on bond. Atwater then filed suit alleging that Turek's actions had violated her Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable seizure. In granting the city summary judgment, the District Court ruled the claim meritless. In affirming, the en banc Court of Appeals held that the arrest was not unreasonable for Fourth Amendment purposes because no one disputed that Turek had probable cause to arrest Atwater, and there was no evidence the arrest was conducted in an extraordinary manner, unusually harmful to Atwater's privacy interests.

Question Presented

Does the Fourth Amendment, either by incorporating common-law restrictions on misdemeanor arrests or otherwise, limit a police officer's authority to arrest without warrant for minor criminal offenses?

Conclusion

No. In a 5-4 opinion delivered by Justice David H. Souter, the Court held that the Fourth Amendment does not forbid a warrantless arrest for a minor criminal offense, such as a misdemeanor seatbelt violation punishable only by a fine. "If an officer has probable cause to believe that an individual has committed even a very minor criminal offense in his presence, he may, without violating the Fourth Amendment, arrest the offender," wrote Justice Souter for the Court. Justice Sandra Day O'Connor's dissenting opinion argued that the Court's decision "neglects the Fourth Amendment's express command in the name of administrative ease" and thus "cloaks the pointless indignity that Gail Atwater suffered with the mantle of reasonableness."
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top