Is 166 to short for me?

[THECLAN]

I'm 5'9", but I ski a ton of rails like 85% rails.

 

[egg.]

i think so. im 5'3 and going to be on 162's

 

[mountainviper]

Yeah dude I'd say a 178 for ya...at the very least a 172.

 

[lukewalnuts]

i'm 5'5 and i'm going to be on 171's

 

[A.Eberhard]

I'm 5'10" and I ride 171's...

 

[^BEANS^]

its all preference short skis = easier to spin less swing weight Longer skis = less likely to flex out when landing backseat. i'm 5foot 4inches and ride 172's

 

[Chasereynolds]

I would go at least 172. If you go too short, you'll lose a lot of stability and you won't like it.

 

[ryano]

i'm 6 ft tall and ride 181s.

 

[ryano]

sorry, i forgot to add, go with a longer ski. more stability. on rails and in the air.

plus if you're filming a lot, they'll actually look decent on camera, and not tiny.

 

[.RYAN66]

I'm 5'11" and on 166. I like a shorter ski though

 

[DaysToCome]

go longer if your going to be going fast at all. You'll be happier with the extra stability and at your height you should be able to throw at least 175-180cm of ski around pretty easily

 

[613.]

im 5 10' and ride 166..