Invaders=sick!!

squawskier

squawskier

Member
I was chekin out the invaders and although a lot of you already knw this,they are way dope. So much lighter than i thought, cool graphics, nice topsheet material, butter zones are super, and the dimensions look really nice. I compared them to the armadas that were there and they looked way better and they are way cheeper. Just thought I'd let you know
 
Did you see any 178's? ( i think thats there size) if so what shop, i was at porters in truckee today and they only had midget size. i need something for urban and its either invaders or fugis.
 
squawskier, u are gay and i really don't like u. its really to bad that you don't know what your talking about.

jk

but silas, u are duche
 
the invaders look better than armada? ahaahahahah, i think not man. but i do think line put out a solid ski this year, topsheet's aside.
 
It's all opinion really, you say potato i say potattoooooo, you say armada, i say line. you gotta aggree to disagree.
 
armadas top sheet does look cool. but I like the invaders topsheet too. The skis is very nice
 
i kind like the invaders topsheet but hate the bottem. And for the record ar5's have the sickest top sheet ever
 
i would rather have the armada topsheet, but the invaders features beats armada. there is too much going on on the invader topsheet. while sliding a rail, id prbly look at my skis instead of where im going
 
agreeably. I personally don't like some of the ar5 topsheets just to much color. the 170 ar5 is the one i like the best. but i do like the invader topsheet. i can't wait to get them from jibij this week.
 
both ar5s and the invaders have sick top sheets but u gotta look farther then that and see how they perform on the slops and in the park
 
The Ar5's definatly look like they are better constructed than the Invaders. I've had lines in the past and they didn't hold up like i had hoped.
 
im going to go with the majority of the people on this site and say both are sick and there are some things i like and dislike about each ski but i have the invaders so yea i guess that was my pick
 
i really dont get all the line hating, why dont people direct their hate towards a company that really doesnt stand by their product, like say....salomon....not saying they arent sic i rocked 1080's last year, but their warranty program sucks.
 
the only thing that i kinda dont like about like, are the back tips. that all, they are sck skis, i dunnno, i just like less of a tip :/
 
not to hate man but butter zone skis are more sold on park landings than BC skis i think you just suck
 
thats the fun of it you have to guess! and if your wrong you'll never know, at least until someone laughs at you for having your skis mounted upside down... hehe.
 
i didnt bash them it was a joke kid, and its been obvious that ive wanted a pair for a while . cant pass up 150 bucks for skis bro.
 
dont the invaders have thicker tips? wouldnt that stabalize on landings...if im wrong and invaders will wash out...lemme know im considering buying them

and for the record the invaders have a punk rock vibe (growing on me but kind of annoying)

armada has a 17 yr old kid on acid point of view which is trippy...so u def cant compare the two. so stop bitchin
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top