Inactive members

[roussillon]

Wouldn't it be a good idea to find a way to delete inactive members? I feel like a lot of the more than 100 000 members haven't logged in for more than a year. I know it's quite useless, but the number of members would be more relevant if only members that have logged in a year were counted there

 

[skodeo7]

This horse has been beaten horribly.

1.) Basically, its not worth the effort.

2.) User names don't take up much space AT ALL

3.) What if a user comes back after however long and their name is gone?

In the words of Matt Harvey "Deleting inactive members would not accomplish anything. If someone

comes back after a year (it happens, trust me!) and their account isn't

there anymore, they'd probably be mad... so only bad things can come of

deleting members."

 

[miroz]

Yeah, for sure no, because you never know when someone might check back in. I know for a fact, however, that there are a bunch of one-time users. Take my friend, for example, who thought she had to join to watch videos. She hasn't logged in since.

 

[Mr.Bishop]

And if she ever came back I would want her account to be there!!

 

[roussillon]

Just a thought I had. Thanks for the answors then!

 

[Dustin.]

Ya I don't think it would make a difference either way.

 

[Treestman]

maybe a change in the last login info on ur profile

so it can go to say 2 months ago or 3 months ago, insted of just more than one month ago, in the sumer for example, some one may not have logged in for 2 months, that doesnt mean they arent an active member