14531016:steez_apprentice said:that's tight asf
14531023:hegleezy said:$850 ???
14531036:nmwninjart said:If I was going to blow almost 1K I'd get the Mango or the Rasta GT.
14531125:Vish-shoe said:
14531125:Vish-shoe said:
14531155:switchlip2 said:Much rather would pay a lil extra for a ski that’ll actually last
14531138:Session said:You spelled "weaker" wrong.
14531187:Icant_kfed said:Speak for yourself my j’s are absolute tanks
14531181:gravel said:L take, J makes some dumb durable skis it's why they're so damn heavy, i've skied a pair for 5 years
14531195:Session said:I'm not commenting on durability, just design.
14531187:Icant_kfed said:Speak for yourself my j’s are absolute tanks
14531198:animator said:They’re heavy because of the use of maple, not because they’re more durable
14531262:IsaacNW82 said:From a materials perspective, ON3P and J skis are actually built pretty similarly. They both tend to use 1.8mm bases, full p-tex sidewalls, huge edges, aka the stuff that usually helps it last longer
14531264:Schoess said:ON3P uses 2.5mm edges on everything other than their touring skis. Also basically everything they use to make skis in the factory is proprietary and totally custom. So by nature, there's no other ski built like them in the world. You can take that for better or for worse but as a small ski manufacturer that's just kind of par for the course.
14531264:Schoess said:ON3P uses 2.5mm edges on everything other than their touring skis. Also basically everything they use to make skis in the factory is proprietary and totally custom. So by nature, there's no other ski built like them in the world. You can take that for better or for worse but as a small ski manufacturer that's just kind of par for the course.
14531269:Icant_kfed said:Doesn’t armada use 2.5s as well?
14531270:IsaacNW82 said:And J exclusively uses a 2.5 x 2.2mm edge. What inherently makes ON3P's factory so different than, say, Moment or Utopie?
This isn't a knock on ON3P at all, I'm saying when you dig into how they are built, J and ON3P are similar in that they almost exclusively use the thickest, burliest materials available, and they are the only two companies I know of that do that
14531277:Schoess said:Different materials, different edge tempering process, different shop processes (meaning workflow, how they get cooked, glued and on and on), different guys with different hands man. Making good skis is really complex and there are SOOOOO many decisions that are made at every step of the process. On paper 2 skis might look somewhat similar but I don't think that tells the whole story. They'll still feel very different (j to ON3P specifically) when you go to ski them. I'm not saying better or worse, just different. I personally prefer ON3P to any other ski but the point here is more about how skis made by small companies generally are not using standardized equipment in any way, have their own recipes, etc. That makes them each unique and in my opinion more interesting.
14531275:Schoess said:On some skis I believe they do, or did at least. Every ski company should say how thick their edges are if you read about the ski on the website. 2.5 is the thickest available from any supplier from my understanding

14531014:SchizoSkier said:They copying vishnu but that’s acc so hard
14531138:Session said:You spelled "weaker" wrong.
14531125:Vish-shoe said: